On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> I make it a habit of eating my own words if I screw up. If the results
>> seen on Ubuntu by one test hold up, it might have a large increase in
>> large writes (but nothing in large reads).
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 1-23-2009 1:19 PM Ashley M. Kirchner spake the following:
>> Quoting Florin Andrei :
>>
>>> I like the stability of Ext3, but in terms of speed it's not the
>>> sharpest lightbulb in the toolshed.
>> Isn't that supposed to be "not the fastest lawnmower in the toolshed" ?
> O
on 1-23-2009 1:19 PM Ashley M. Kirchner spake the following:
> Quoting Florin Andrei :
>
>> I like the stability of Ext3, but in terms of speed it's not the
>> sharpest lightbulb in the toolshed.
>
> Isn't that supposed to be "not the fastest lawnmower in the toolshed" ?
Or " the sharpest crayon
Quoting Florin Andrei :
> I like the stability of Ext3, but in terms of speed it's not the
> sharpest lightbulb in the toolshed.
Isn't that supposed to be "not the fastest lawnmower in the toolshed" ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I like the stability of Ext3, but in terms of speed it's not the
> sharpest lightbulb in the toolshed.
ROTFL: "sharpest lightbulb in the toolshed."
--
Paul "the only sharp lightbulb is a broken one" Heinlein
__
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> I make it a habit of eating my own words if I screw up. If the results
> seen on Ubuntu by one test hold up, it might have a large increase in
> large writes (but nothing in large reads).
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_ext4&num=1
Rig
On Friday 23 January 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> >> Hi guys - I'm really looking forward to 5.3 for the potential of ext4.
> >> I am moving/copying image files lately 8G
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>>> Hi guys - I'm really looking forward to 5.3 for the potential of ext4.
>>> I am moving/copying image files lately 8G file and it is slow. I am
>>> hoping that ext4 really speeds that up.
>> I don't think it will speed things up much. 8GB files are mostly
>> hardwa
"Real World Benchmarks Of The EXT4 File-System"
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_benchmarks&num=1
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>> Hi guys - I'm really looking forward to 5.3 for the potential of ext4.
>> I am moving/copying image files lately 8G file and it is slow. I am
>> hoping that ext4 really speeds that
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>
> I disagree. On most raid-controllers we use XFS has a significant advantage
> over Ext3 when it comes to large sequential writes. Ext3 gets nowhere near
> the bare metal performance.
>
> So, in short, I think it will be interesting to see how Ext4 performs for
> thi
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, nate wrote:
> Renato de Oliveira Diogo wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > Do you test in other file system? Like xfs or jfs?
> > You can use the "time" command to get the exate time:
> > # time cp /pathsource/file8g /pathdest/
> >
> > Post here yours results.
>
> I like to use rsy
Renato de Oliveira Diogo wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Do you test in other file system? Like xfs or jfs?
> You can use the "time" command to get the exate time:
> # time cp /pathsource/file8g /pathdest/
>
> Post here yours results.
I like to use rsync with --progress so it shows realtime
updates on the status
Hi;
Do you test in other file system? Like xfs or jfs?
You can use the "time" command to get the exate time:
# time cp /pathsource/file8g /pathdest/
Post here yours results.
[]s
Renato de Oliveira Diogo
Bacharel em Ciência da Computação
UNESP - B
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi guys - I'm really looking forward to 5.3 for the potential of ext4.
> I am moving/copying image files lately 8G file and it is slow. I am
> hoping that ext4 really speeds that up.
I don't think it will speed things up much. 8GB files are mos
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:33 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Will the boot partition still be ext3 and then have to mount the ext4
> filesystem?
Yes, but you wouldn't gain much by making /boot ext4.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
signature.asc
Description: Th
16 matches
Mail list logo