>
> It's impossible to create a route via a host that can't be resolved by
> ARP (for IPv4).
>
Very true in general - the assumption in IRC was that text is not
always the best medium for transmitting ideas - especially when
someone is specifically anonymising stuff or does not have english as
a f
On 08/17/2012 06:50 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> This somewhat describes the situation:
> http://www.adminsehow.com/2011/09/gateway-on-a-different-subnet-on-linux/
That still describes a configuration where the gateway is in a local
broadcast domain.
It's impossible to create a route via a host th
> 'unique' is a very mild expression. The word you're actually looking for was
> probably 'wrong'.
>
> Your gateway *must* be in the network your interfaces are in. You also would
> not want your living room be built without any doors and a sign on the wall
> 'the exit is in the kitchen'.
There
Hi Boris,
> We have a somewhat unique setup whereby our default router is outside of
> the local network.
'unique' is a very mild expression. The word you're actually looking for was
probably 'wrong'.
Your gateway *must* be in the network your interfaces are in. You also would
not want your l
> 10.1.1.1 via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0
> default 10.1.1.1 dev eth0
>
You need to revisit your networking knowledge ... specifically what a
gateway is...
You need a router (gateway) on 192.168.10.0/24 (presumably 192.168.10.1 in
your example). On this you have a default route to the next hop of
10.1
5 matches
Mail list logo
