On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:01:04AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
> hi,
>
> is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or
> is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this?
>
This wiki page has some repo-links (and other related info):
http://wik
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:39 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:44:18AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> That blaming CentOS for the switch to KVM and the deprecation of Xen
>> doesn't make sense since it's simply re-rpm'ing RHEL.
>
> Ok, that makes sense and I fully agree :) I bla
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:44:18AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>
> That blaming CentOS for the switch to KVM and the deprecation of Xen
> doesn't make sense since it's simply re-rpm'ing RHEL.
Ok, that makes sense and I fully agree :) I blame the lack of bacon
for not understanding that earlier. Thanks
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:41 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> 2. A so-called Enterprise Operating System like RHEL.
>
> And your gratuitous edit of this point serves what purpose exactly?
That blaming CentOS for the switch to KVM and the d
hi,
On 07/28/2011 08:01 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
> is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or
> is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this?
having spoken to a couple of people who have shown interest in this
issue over the last few mont
Le 28/07/2011 13:27, Tom H a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
I can definitely say why I need Xen... My reasons are partially selfish -
I have some older hardware at home that does not support native hardware
virtualization (two Dell Precision 470s and a Dell Poweredge SC 430)...
By using Xen, the performance is great for me using VMs... Using qemu
d
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:27:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>
> 2. A so-called Enterprise Operating System like RHEL.
And your gratuitous edit of this point serves what purpose exactly?
John
--
People learn something every day, and a lot of
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
i think i am not the only one who wants
On 07/28/2011 11:49 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
> Am 28.07.11 11:23, schrieb Peter Peltonen:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A few more questions :)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
i think i a
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few more questions :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
>>>
>>> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :)
On 07/28/2011 10:23 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> What are the reasons for people staying with Xen as dom0, just the
> learning curve? Or are there some technical considerations as well?
while they are all relevant and good questions, please start a new
thread when going off on a tangent from the e
Am 28.07.11 11:23, schrieb Peter Peltonen:
> Hi,
>
> A few more questions :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
>>>
>>> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :)
>>
>> Far fro
Hi,
A few more questions :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
>>
>> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :)
>
> Far from it. Xen still has a place as a dom0.
What are the re
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
>
> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :)
Far from it. Xen still has a place as a dom0.
John
--
Since when do we have to agree with people
Hello Kb,
theres myoungs repo available, he maintains a 2.6.32 kernel for fedora
which has been ported to rhel/centos 6 as well.
http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/
perhaps this could be a base for cplus xen. for me it worked fine so
far, but i whouldnt take it onto production until further
On 07/28/2011 08:01 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
> hi,
>
> is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or
> is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this?
if someone was to step up and offer to manintain it, and a few people to
help test it - CentO
17 matches
Mail list logo