On 05/17/2010 03:44 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> What about re-mounting the same block device (presumably as ext3) in ro
> mode at another mountpoint?
>
> Or if that complained, maybe created an additional block device under
> /dev with identical major/minor numbers and mounting *that* RO?
>
> Maybe
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:49:20PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> On May 17, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:41:40PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> >> On May 17, 2010, at 5:37 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> >>>
>
On May 17, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:41:40PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On May 17, 2010, at 5:37 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>>
Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
> Don't do NFS localhos
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:41:40PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> On May 17, 2010, at 5:37 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> >
> >> Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
> >>> Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
> >>
> >> Why would you want to do l
On May 17, 2010, at 5:37 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>
>> Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
>>> Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
>>
>> Why would you want to do localhost: NFS mounts anyway?
>
> Perhaps for a restricted 'regrafting' RO ove
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote on 05/17/2010 12:15 PM:
>> Don't do NFS localhost mounts from fstab
>
> Why would you want to do localhost: NFS mounts anyway?
Perhaps for a restricted 'regrafting' RO overmount down in a
autobuilder's chroot tree, rather than a '
6 matches
Mail list logo
