> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of sebasti...@datafaber.net
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 11:27
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7
Le 16/09/2011 17:26, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit :
> Many thanks to all the people on the list who have suggestions and
> advice, particularly to Alain Péan who pointed me in the right
> direction.
You are welcome, but I don't know how my suggestions lead you to the
idea to setup a local rep
I've finally managed to update one of my boxes to 5.7. I did it in a
very roundabout way, which however confirms that at least in my boxes
there's something wrong in the way yum creates the sqlite databases.
I've basically followed the guide at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalMirror to
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, wrote:
[snip]
> So either several mirrors all have the same corrupted file, or my box
> is generating a corrupted file each time. I would tend towards the
> second hypothesis, since other people have successfully updated their
> 5.6 installations to 5.7.
Have you
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night -
>> suggested yum reinstall yum?
>
> This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same
> way (not unexpectedly, I
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night -
>> suggested yum reinstall yum?
>
> This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same
> way (not unexpectedly, I
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night -
> suggested yum reinstall yum?
This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same
way (not unexpectedly, I would say):
[root@picard ~]# yum reinst
Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> On 16/09/11 08:22, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
>> Based on what I'm seeing, I do not think that yum is downloading a
>> corrupt sqlite database, rather than it is creating a corrupt database
>> all by itself. I have however no definite confirmation of this and I
>> would like to
On 16/09/11 08:22, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> Based on what I'm seeing, I do not think that yum is downloading a
> corrupt sqlite database, rather than it is creating a corrupt database
> all by itself. I have however no definite confirmation of this and I
> would like to have one before filing a
On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> Josh Miller wrote:
>> On 09/15/2011 02:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
>>> Craig White wrote:
mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
su
Josh Miller wrote:
> On 09/15/2011 02:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
>> Craig White wrote:
>>> mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
>>>
>>> and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
>>> suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails
Brian Miller wrote:
> Sorry if this has been suggested already - have you tried running with
> all plugins disabled?
>
> 'yum --noplugins check-update'
This wasn't suggested yet, but I did try it at some point. I've just
tried again and the result is the same:
[root@picard ~]# yum clean all
Load
On 09/15/2011 02:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>> mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
>>
>> and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
>> suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails to find it.
>
> Unfortunat
Craig White wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
>
>> Craig White wrote:
>>> mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
>>>
>>> and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
>>> suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:06 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> post the output of...
It was the same as mine in Centos 5.6, now 5.7
Paul.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>> mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
>>
>> and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
>> suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails to find it.
>
> U
Craig White wrote:
> mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
>
> and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
> suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails to find it.
Unfortunately yum recreates the same corrupted file, even if I move
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:37 +0200, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
> And there's also plenty of available space on the other 5 boxes which
> exhibit the same issue.
Sorry if this has been suggested already - have you tried running with
all plugins disabled?
'yum --noplugins check-update'
I hav
Alain Péan wrote:
> What if you delete (or save elsewhere) the primary.xml.gz.sqlite file ?
> If it is corrupted, it would do no arm, and perhaps it is no more used
> or regenerated if it missing ?
This doesn't work unfortunately, yum always creates the same corrupted file:
- here I use yum to de
Le 15/09/2011 18:44, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit :
> You may be onto something, I've seen that the 5.6 base repo has the
> sqlite metadata store while the 5.7 base repo hasn't it. But the 20K
> sqlite file that yum generates on my boxes looks to have at least
> something related to sqlite insi
Le 15/09/2011 18:37, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit :
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:33:39 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
>>> The file /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz.sqlite is only 20KB,
>>> whereas in the "normal" case I'd expect it to be 6.5MB. Somehow, yum
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:16 AM, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:42:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
>> might be hard to run package-cleanup without having base enabled but
>> I would certainly recommend that you run 'rpm -Va [--nofiles
>> --nodigest]' to identify the broken depe
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:36:10 +0200, Alain Péan wrote:
> And here is the answer from Karanbir Singh :
>
> "unfortunately, you hit an issue that I did not think anyone would
> see (
> but was aware of... ). The issue originates from the fact that the
> new
> CR repo has no sqlite metadata store, it
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:33:39 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
>> The file /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz.sqlite is only 20KB,
>> whereas in the "normal" case I'd expect it to be 6.5MB. Somehow, yum
>> is
>
> you're not out of hard drive space on that partiti
Le 15/09/2011 18:16, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit :
> [root@picard ~]# ll /var/cache/yum/base
> total 1004K
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Sep 15 19:12 cachecookie
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1017 Sep 15 19:11 mirrorlist.txt
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Jul 10 12:19 packages/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root r
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
> The file /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz.sqlite is only 20KB,
> whereas in the "normal" case I'd expect it to be 6.5MB. Somehow, yum is
you're not out of hard drive space on that partition, are you?
___
CentOS mailing
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:42:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> might be hard to run package-cleanup without having base enabled but
> I would certainly recommend that you run 'rpm -Va [--nofiles
> --nodigest]' to identify the broken dependencies - apparently
> something that the base repository really be
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:18 AM, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:57:02 -0700, Craig White wrote:
>> sounds like someone did some manual mucking in /etc/yum.repos.d
>>
>> You probably want to start disabling some of the configured repo's
>> in /etc/yum.repos.d... 'enabled = 0
Stupid question.
Can we uninstall yum? And install again using manual rpm.
나의 iPhone에서 보냄
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:57:02 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> sounds like someone did some manual mucking in /etc/yum.repos.d
>
> You probably want to start disabling some of the configured repo's
> in /etc/yum.repos.d... 'enabled = 0' - I'd probably start by making
> sure
> that all non-CentOS repo's
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:30:01 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:18 +0200, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
>
>
>> Update: yum chose to use another mirror and it failed in the exact
>> same way.
I could do that, but it is again extremely unlikely that 6 disks on 6
different bo
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:18 +0200, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
> Update: yum chose to use another mirror and it failed in the exact
> same way.
Time for a file check on your disk.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:10:50 +0200, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:44:59 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
>> wrote:
>>> Perhaps your are downloading the same corrupted primary.xml.gz
>>> from mirror.opendoc.net. Maybe try an
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 08:22 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > make sure that there isn't any yum/rpm processes running...
> > ps aux|grep yum
> > ps aux|grep rpm
> >
> > Once you've determined they aren't running, try...
> >
> > yum clean metadata
> > yum clean dbcache
> >
> >
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:01:23 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:35 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
>
>> [root@picard ~]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/
>> total 20K
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Base.repo
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 631 Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Debuginfo.r
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:44:59 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
> wrote:
>> Perhaps your are downloading the same corrupted primary.xml.gz
>> from mirror.opendoc.net. Maybe try another mirror? Perhaps
>> download
>> the file manually and compare?
Thi
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
wrote:
> Perhaps your are downloading the same corrupted primary.xml.gz
> from mirror.opendoc.net. Maybe try another mirror? Perhaps download
> the file manually and compare?
Yeah could be. And if your corporate network is behind a proxy, the
prox
On 15/09/11 16:22, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> [root@picard yum.repos.d]# yum clean dbcache
> Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, priorities
> 0 sqlite files removed
> [root@picard yum.repos.d]# yum update
>
> Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, priorities
> Loading mirror speeds
Craig White wrote:
> make sure that there isn't any yum/rpm processes running...
> ps aux|grep yum
> ps aux|grep rpm
>
> Once you've determined they aren't running, try...
>
> yum clean metadata
> yum clean dbcache
>
> (those should be executed when you execute 'yum clean all' but maybe it ain't
>
Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
>
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.6K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Vault.repo
>
> Do you need CentOS-Vault, as it includes all the packages
> from Centos 5.x upwards IIRC?
It's in there by default, since the first install on the box. All the
r
Always Learning wrote:
> Please try one thing for me
>
> yum install httpd
>
> It does not matter whether or not you have this already installed. I am
> curious to know what type of response you get. You do not have to
> install this. It is the reaction from yum that interests me, so you can
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:35 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> [root@picard ~]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/
> total 20K
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Base.repo
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 631 Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Debuginfo.repo
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 626 Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Media.repo
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.6K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Vault.repo
Do you need CentOS-Vault, as it includes all the packages
from Centos 5.x upwards IIRC?
Keith
-
Websites:
http://www.karsite
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:35 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> Thank you very much for your help.
Please do not forget I am a Learner, not an expert :-)
Please try one thing for me
yum install httpd
It does not matter whether or not you have this already installed. I am
curious to know
Always Learning wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:26 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
>
> Can you list, one line for each, the names of the repos
> in /etc/yum.repos.d
[root@picard ~]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/
total 20K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Base.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 63
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:26 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> Always Learning wrote:
>>
> > Have you tried
> >
> > yum clean all
> >
> >
> > followed by
> >
> > yum update
> >
> > ?
>
> Yes, I've tried it, with the exact same result:
>
> [root@picard ~]# yum clean all
> Loaded plugins: d
Always Learning wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:56 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
>> I'm trying to update my CentOS 5.6 boxes to 5.7, and on every single one
>> of them yum is failing with a segmentation fault: the error happens when
>> yum is checking the 'base' repository.
>
> Have you tried
>
On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> I'm trying to update my CentOS 5.6 boxes to 5.7, and on every single one
> of them yum is failing with a segmentation fault: the error happens when
> yum is checking the 'base' repository.
>
> [root@picard yum]# yum update
> Loaded plugins
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:56 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
> I'm trying to update my CentOS 5.6 boxes to 5.7, and on every single one
> of them yum is failing with a segmentation fault: the error happens when
> yum is checking the 'base' repository.
Have you tried
yum clean all
follo
49 matches
Mail list logo