On Thursday 28 June 2007 10:18, Feizhou wrote:
> Tony Molloy wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 June 2007 08:58, Feizhou wrote:
> >>> That's probably it. The SELinux problem strikes again.
> >>
> >> If you hate SELinux that much, just turn it off.
> >
> > I don't "hate" it. I just forget that it causes prob
Tony Molloy wrote:
On Thursday 28 June 2007 08:58, Feizhou wrote:
That's probably it. The SELinux problem strikes again.
If you hate SELinux that much, just turn it off.
I don't "hate" it. I just forget that it causes problems sometimes when it's
not configured properly.
:) 'The SELinux pr
On Thursday 28 June 2007 08:58, Feizhou wrote:
> > That's probably it. The SELinux problem strikes again.
>
> If you hate SELinux that much, just turn it off.
I don't "hate" it. I just forget that it causes problems sometimes when it's
not configured properly.
Tony
>
That's probably it. The SELinux problem strikes again.
If you hate SELinux that much, just turn it off.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 13:16, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On 6/26/07, Tony Molloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this a permissions problem or does vsftpd not allow separate
> > filesystems to be seen.
>
> Have you looked in the log files for errors? Are you using selinux? If
> you're using selinux, yo
On 6/26/07, Tony Molloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this a permissions problem or does vsftpd not allow separate filesystems to
be seen.
Have you looked in the log files for errors? Are you using selinux? If
you're using selinux, you'll have to adjust the contexts so that
vsftpd has access t
6 matches
Mail list logo
