At 08:57 AM 4/19/2016, you wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, david wrote:
At 09:09 AM 4/18/2016, you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, david wrote:
> FOLLOWUP & REPORT
> > I had lots of suggestions, and the most persuasive was to try
OpenVPN. I > already had a CA working, so issuing certificates
was
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, david wrote:
At 09:09 AM 4/18/2016, you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, david wrote:
> FOLLOWUP & REPORT
>
> I had lots of suggestions, and the most persuasive was to try OpenVPN. I
> already had a CA working, so issuing certificates was easy. The HOW-TO
> guides were
At 09:09 AM 4/18/2016, you wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, david wrote:
FOLLOWUP & REPORT
I had lots of suggestions, and the most persuasive was to try
OpenVPN. I already had a CA working, so issuing certificates was
easy. The HOW-TO guides were less helpful than I could hope, but
comparin
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, david wrote:
FOLLOWUP & REPORT
I had lots of suggestions, and the most persuasive was to try
OpenVPN. I already had a CA working, so issuing certificates was
easy. The HOW-TO guides were less helpful than I could hope, but
comparing several of them, applying common sen
Folks
I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home
server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my
home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for
any external query, but also let me access my computers inside my home.
I already ha
Have a look at Openconnect Server (ocserv), it's a free implementation of Cisco
AnyConnect.
It's the easiest VPN I ever had to setup and it's compatible with most Cisco
AnyConnect clients and of course OpenConnect clients (such as
NetworkManager-openconnect).
http://www.infradead.org/ocserv/
On 04/05/2016 12:30 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
IPSec is typically encapsulated on UDP port 4500, due to the ubiquity
of NAT. OpenVPN doesn't really have an advantage, there.
IPSec and OpenVPN (and the others) each have their use cases. I have
had experience with IPSec (via SmoothWall's SmoothTu
Yes, openvpn works on any single udp or tcp port.
On many hotels only http, https and dns allowed. So you just can't use
ipsec, but openvpn works as it's usually configured to listen https port.
--
Eero
2016-04-05 19:30 GMT+03:00 Gordon Messmer :
> On 04/05/2016 12:07 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
On 04/05/2016 08:52 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
For host-to-site setups I prefer OpenVPN since explaining to endusers
how to set up an ipsec connection is neigh impossible
So, send them a powershell script:
Add-VpnConnection -Name "My VPN" -ServerAddress "vpn.example.com"
-Authentication
On 04/05/2016 12:07 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
IPSec is not recommended solution nowdays. OpenVPN runs top of single udp
or tcp port, so it usually works on strictly firewalled places like in
hotels and so on.
IPSec is typically encapsulated on UDP port 4500, due to the ubiquity of
NAT. OpenVP
How is IPSec "not recommended solution nowdays"?
I tend to use IPSec for site-to-site connections i.e. the ones that run
24/7 and only require two experienced people to set up (the admins at
both endpoints).
For host-to-site setups I prefer OpenVPN since explaining to endusers
how to set up an ips
Well. IPSec might work with site-to-site connections, but usually
roadwarrior mode users experience (a lot of) problems.
They might be related to hotels that only allow https, http and dns
protocols or broken nat implementations and so on.
--
Eero
2016-04-05 18:52 GMT+03:00 Dennis Jacobfeuerbo
Am 05.04.2016 um 12:46 schrieb Francis Mendoza :
> OpenVPN is the best opensource VPN for me it can connect to any connection
> such as airport, hotel, restaurant, resorts, malls it never let me down.
> And configuration is easy on those who have idea on what they want to
> achieve.
"easy" is qual
OpenVPN is the best opensource VPN for me it can connect to any connection
such as airport, hotel, restaurant, resorts, malls it never let me down.
And configuration is easy on those who have idea on what they want to
achieve.
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> IPSec is not recomm
IPSec is not recommended solution nowdays. OpenVPN runs top of single udp
or tcp port, so it usually works on strictly firewalled places like in
hotels and so on.
--
Eero
2016-04-04 23:18 GMT+03:00 Gordon Messmer :
> On 04/04/2016 10:57 AM, david wrote:
>
>> I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, O
SoftEther VPN all-in-one solution and cross platform.
On Monday, April 4, 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
>> This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here.
>> They, too, kind of recommend openvpn.
>>
>> http://www.howtogeek.com/21
On 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here.
They, too, kind of recommend openvpn.
http://www.howtogeek.com/211329/which-is-the-best-vpn-protocol-pptp-vs.-openvpn-vs.-l2tpipsec-vs.-sstp/
This is not good information.
In brie
Am 04.04.2016 um 19:57 schrieb david:
Folks
I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server
via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home
network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any
external query, but also let me access my computer
On 04/04/2016 10:57 AM, david wrote:
I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan
(and probably others I haven't noted). I'd be interested in hearing
from anyone who wishes to comment about which to use, with the
following requirements:
I recommend l2tp/ipsec. It's sup
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, david wrote:
I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan
(and probably others I haven't noted). I'd be interested in hearing
from anyone who wishes to comment about which to use, with the
following requirements:
1) As noted, it should be secure (a
On 4.4.2016 22.01, Eero Volotinen wrote:
And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure.
This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here.
They, too, kind of recommend openvpn.
http://www.howtogeek.com/211329/which-is-the-best-vpn-protocol-pptp-vs.-open
My partner has been using Openvpn extensively. It looks very reasonable
and has been quite trustworthy.
It is configured via commandline. The server seems to work on Windows,
too ("Vista and later"). There are good tutorials for CentOs, for example
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutor
And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure.
Eero
4.4.2016 9.55 ip. "Richard Zimmerman"
kirjoitti:
> SoftEther VPN
>
> Once setup, it just works
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
>
> ---
> Richard Zimmerman
> Systems / Network Administrator
> River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc.
>
SoftEther VPN
Once setup, it just works
Regards,
Richard
---
Richard Zimmerman
Systems / Network Administrator
River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc.
S Main Street
South Bend, IN 46601-3337
(574) 233-1133
(574) 280-7284 Fax
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailt
24 matches
Mail list logo
