> Am 04.08.2017 um 15:20 schrieb Matthew Miller :
>
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 02:10:31PM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote:
>>> I think what you're looking for here is Flatpak.
>> Just a off-topic question (maybe in the future of EL less off-topic);
>> Does the concept of flatpak make updates in general
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 02:10:31PM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote:
> > I think what you're looking for here is Flatpak.
> Just a off-topic question (maybe in the future of EL less off-topic);
> Does the concept of flatpak make updates in general more complicated
> (e.g. security issues in libraries)?
Am 03.08.2017 um 15:55 schrieb Matthew Miller :
>
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:25:36PM +0200, hw wrote:
>>> In all honesty, I wouldn't want Libreoffice running in a container
>>> and I can't imagine why you'd want an xterm in its own container.
>> It was only an example. The point of doing that i
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:25:36PM +0200, hw wrote:
> >In all honesty, I wouldn't want Libreoffice running in a container
> >and I can't imagine why you'd want an xterm in its own container.
> It was only an example. The point of doing that is to use different versions
> of
> xterm and of emacs a
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 02:36:33PM +0200, hw wrote:
> >Trolling aside (fascist? really?), I've gotten valuable feedback from
> >several people which I really appreciate. I intend to continue to
> >engage with the CentOS community, because when we work on big changes
> >in Fedora which may come to o
Mark Haney wrote:
On 08/02/2017 10:57 AM, hw wrote:
It probably makes sense under the assumption that you do pretty much
everything in one container or another and that it doesn´t bother you
having to switch between all the containers to do something. That would
require something like a window
Mark Haney wrote:
On 08/02/2017 08:27 AM, hw wrote:
Jonathan Billings wrote:
I’m confused, are you talking about Gentoo, Fedora, CentOS or RHEL?
I´m talking about Centos here and am referring to experiences with other
distributions at the same time.
Like Gentoo is great but horrible to keep
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:04:54PM +0200, hw wrote:
Just wait and see how he will like the feedback he?s getting here ...
Trolling aside (fascist? really?), I've gotten valuable feedback from
several people which I really appreciate. I intend to continue to
engage with th
Mark Haney wrote:
On 08/02/2017 07:36 AM, hw wrote:
Don´t get me started on Fedora updates. One of the reasons to deprecate
Fedora was that upgrading had turned out to be unreliable and mostly
failing. Not being able to reliably upgrade disqualifies any distribution.
I hate to break it to y
On 08/02/2017 11:13 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Mark Haney wrote:
Sure there is such a thing. It's a tiled console package (tilix is
what I use). In all honesty, I wouldn't want Libreoffice running in
a container and I can't imagine why you'd want an xterm in its own
contain
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Mark Haney wrote:
Sure there is such a thing. It's a tiled console package (tilix is what I
use). In all honesty, I wouldn't want Libreoffice running in a container and
I can't imagine why you'd want an xterm in its own container. Most
containers I've built have been RES
On 08/02/2017 10:57 AM, hw wrote:
It probably makes sense under the assumption that you do pretty much
everything in one container or another and that it doesn´t bother you
having to switch between all the containers to do something. That would
require something like a window manager turned int
It probably makes sense under the assumption that you do pretty much
everything in one container or another and that it doesn´t bother you
having to switch between all the containers to do something. That would
require something like a window manager turned into a container manager,
and it goes
On 08/02/2017 07:27 AM, hw wrote:
> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:56 PM, hw wrote:
>>> Are you sure that all the added complexity and implicitly giving up a
>>> stable platform by providing a mess of package versions is worth it?
>>> How
>>> are the plans about dealing with bu
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 03:40:42PM +0200, hw wrote:
> >No, this isn't it it all. Modules are sets of packages which the
> >distribution creators have selected to work together; you don't compose
> >modules as an end-user.
>
> Then maybe my understanding of packages and/or modules is wrong.
> What
Warren Young wrote:
On Jul 28, 2017, at 11:56 AM, hw wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:13:42PM +0200, hw wrote:
What?s the point of doing this with Fedora? It?s not like bugs
were fixed before Fedora is EOL and all reports are forgotten.
Many bugs are fixed in Fedora
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 07:56:41PM +0200, hw wrote:
Sure is: You get to manage your distribution yourself by picking the
versions of packages you figure might work together, which you are
supposed and required to do with Gentoo, especially when you run into
yet another dep
On 08/02/2017 08:27 AM, hw wrote:
Jonathan Billings wrote:
I’m confused, are you talking about Gentoo, Fedora, CentOS or RHEL?
I´m talking about Centos here and am referring to experiences with other
distributions at the same time.
Like Gentoo is great but horrible to keep up to date, and in
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:04:54PM +0200, hw wrote:
> Just wait and see how he will like the feedback he?s getting here ...
Trolling aside (fascist? really?), I've gotten valuable feedback from
several people which I really appreciate. I intend to continue to
engage with the CentOS community, beca
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:18:39PM +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, hw wrote:
>
> > That?s what I thought, and it may still be true. Unfortunately, feedback,
> > bug reports and even fixes and improvements experience so much unkindness
> > or ignorance in their reception that I?m
Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:56 PM, hw wrote:
Are you sure that all the added complexity and implicitly giving up a
stable platform by providing a mess of package versions is worth it? How
are the plans about dealing with bug reports, say, for squid 2.7, for
those who need th
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, hw wrote:
That?s what I thought, and it may still be true. Unfortunately, feedback,
bug reports and even fixes and improvements experience so much unkindness
or ignorance in their reception that I?m better off finding a different
solution or fixing the bug myself, with very
Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:56 PM, hw wrote:
Many bugs are fixed in Fedora. Many more bugs are fixed in the
upstreams. Please remember that Fedora is primarily an *integration*
project, and the best way to get bugs fixed is for the developers of
the code in question to be
On 08/02/2017 07:36 AM, hw wrote:
Don´t get me started on Fedora updates. One of the reasons to deprecate
Fedora was that upgrading had turned out to be unreliable and mostly
failing. Not being able to reliably upgrade disqualifies any
distribution.
I hate to break it to you, but since the
Johnny Hughes wrote:
I personally have a Fedora machine that I keep updated and do some work
on all the time learning/testing. I just seamlessly upgraded it from
Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 using a couple of dnf commands .. awesome
experience actually.
Don´t get me started on Fedora updates. One o
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:11:53PM +0100, Phil Perry wrote:
The issue I have here is even if I did file a bug, and the issue
were fixed, no sooner than it's fixed fedora updates to the next
version and introduces a whole bunch of new bugs, and so the cycle
continues. I play
Phil Perry wrote:
However, I´m seeing the same bugs from years ago still unfixed in Centos.
That refers to libreoffice being unusably slow. This still doesn´t seem
to be fixed for Fedora, either, because it went EOL --- but I don´t know.
Agree on that. My previous 10 year old el5 install ran
On 07/31/2017 11:59 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 31.07.2017 13:23, Mark Haney wrote:
Uh, I run VMWare workstation just fine on my F26 upgraded machine.
No, it didn't work when I upgraded, but it's trivial to fix.
http://rglinuxtech.com/?p=1939
This link gets you a running workstation in about 5 mi
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:59:24PM +0200, Walter H. wrote:
> > No, this wasn't really a Fedora issue, it's a VMWare issue.
> doesn't really help me, the upgrade killed my VMware Workstation
It still doesn't stop it from being a VMWare issue. VMware has kernel
modules that need to be compiled ag
On 31.07.2017 13:15, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Running external things like VMWare Workstation (or other 3rd party
custom compiled apps) is exactly what enterprise distros like RHEL,
CentOS, Ubuntu LTS, SUSE SLES are designed for .. running things already
compiled for a long period of time while prov
On 31.07.2017 13:23, Mark Haney wrote:
Uh, I run VMWare workstation just fine on my F26 upgraded machine. No,
it didn't work when I upgraded, but it's trivial to fix.
http://rglinuxtech.com/?p=1939
This link gets you a running workstation in about 5 minutes.
not really, with this I only get th
On Jul 28, 2017, at 11:56 AM, hw wrote:
>
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:13:42PM +0200, hw wrote:
>>> What?s the point of doing this with Fedora? It?s not like bugs
>>> were fixed before Fedora is EOL and all reports are forgotten.
>>
>> Many bugs are fixed in Fedora. Man
On 07/31/2017 07:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/30/2017 02:07 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 30.07.2017 20:22, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/30/2017 09:41 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 30.07.2017 14:29, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I personally have a Fedora machine that I keep updated and do some work
on all the
On 07/30/2017 02:07 PM, Walter H. wrote:
> On 30.07.2017 20:22, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 07/30/2017 09:41 AM, Walter H. wrote:
>>> On 30.07.2017 14:29, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I personally have a Fedora machine that I keep updated and do some work
on all the time learning/testing. I just
On 30.07.2017 20:22, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/30/2017 09:41 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 30.07.2017 14:29, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I personally have a Fedora machine that I keep updated and do some work
on all the time learning/testing. I just seamlessly upgraded it from
Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 using
On 07/30/2017 09:41 AM, Walter H. wrote:
> On 30.07.2017 14:29, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> I personally have a Fedora machine that I keep updated and do some work
>> on all the time learning/testing. I just seamlessly upgraded it from
>> Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 using a couple of dnf commands .. awesom
On 30.07.2017 14:29, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I personally have a Fedora machine that I keep updated and do some work
on all the time learning/testing. I just seamlessly upgraded it from
Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 using a couple of dnf commands .. awesome
experience actually.
because of this feature to
On 07/28/2017 04:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:11:53PM +0100, Phil Perry wrote:
>> The issue I have here is even if I did file a bug, and the issue
>> were fixed, no sooner than it's fixed fedora updates to the next
>> version and introduces a whole bunch of new bugs, an
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 07:56:41PM +0200, hw wrote:
> Sure is: You get to manage your distribution yourself by picking the
> versions of packages you figure might work together, which you are
> supposed and required to do with Gentoo, especially when you run into
> yet another dependency conflict.
On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:56 PM, hw wrote:
> Are you sure that all the added complexity and implicitly giving up a
> stable platform by providing a mess of package versions is worth it? How
> are the plans about dealing with bug reports, say, for squid 2.7, for
> those who need that version for a fea
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:56 PM, hw wrote:
>
>> Many bugs are fixed in Fedora. Many more bugs are fixed in the
>> upstreams. Please remember that Fedora is primarily an *integration*
>> project, and the best way to get bugs fixed is for the developers of
>> the code in question to be involved. Man
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:11:53PM +0100, Phil Perry wrote:
> The issue I have here is even if I did file a bug, and the issue
> were fixed, no sooner than it's fixed fedora updates to the next
> version and introduces a whole bunch of new bugs, and so the cycle
> continues. I played that game for
On 28/07/17 18:56, hw wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:13:42PM +0200, hw wrote:
What?s the point of doing this with Fedora? It?s not like bugs
were fixed before Fedora is EOL and all reports are forgotten.
Many bugs are fixed in Fedora. Many more bugs are fixed in the
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:13:42PM +0200, hw wrote:
What?s the point of doing this with Fedora? It?s not like bugs
were fixed before Fedora is EOL and all reports are forgotten.
Many bugs are fixed in Fedora. Many more bugs are fixed in the
upstreams. Please remember tha
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:13:42PM +0200, hw wrote:
> What?s the point of doing this with Fedora? It?s not like bugs
> were fixed before Fedora is EOL and all reports are forgotten.
Many bugs are fixed in Fedora. Many more bugs are fixed in the
upstreams. Please remember that Fedora is primarily
Sometime it is too obvious! Users had the group in question as their
primary group. I changed the primary group for those users and problem
fixed.
Sorry for the noise :/
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Bernard Fay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last Thursday I removed users from an LDAP group and today
Nicholas, hello again.
while checking thru old emails to archive, noted that i did not update
you on your downgrade solution.
seems solution was a one shot deal.
ran an update before last one with new kernel, had same problem of
user unable to login.
dropped to cl ran downgrade, back to gui lo
hello Nicolas,
thank you for your reply.
On 07/21/16 12:19, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> On 07/21/2016 01:56 PM, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote:
>> El 21/7/16 a las 8:53, geo.inbox.ignore escribió:
>>
>>> greetings to all.
>>>
>>> centos = 6.8 current
>>> system = toshiba l455d-s5976 laptop
>>>
information i was asked for is collected, but i am having problem
finding a text file storage site that allows viewing instead of
downloading. i thought i had bookmarked such, but seems i may
have not restored bookmarks for such sites when i rebuilt this box.
tia.
--
peace out.
-+-
Tired o
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Thu, July 21, 2016 07:56, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote:
>> El 21/7/16 a las 8:53, geo.inbox.ignore escribió:
>>
>>> greetings to all.
>>>
>>> centos = 6.8 current
>>> system = toshiba l455d-s5976 laptop
>>>
>>> a new problem has developed after 1st updating of 6.8.
>>
On 07/21/2016 01:56 PM, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote:
El 21/7/16 a las 8:53, geo.inbox.ignore escribió:
greetings to all.
centos = 6.8 current
system = toshiba l455d-s5976 laptop
a new problem has developed after 1st updating of 6.8.
regular user is not able to open kde desktop, can open
On Thu, July 21, 2016 07:56, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote:
> El 21/7/16 a las 8:53, geo.inbox.ignore escribió:
>
>> greetings to all.
>>
>> centos = 6.8 current
>> system = toshiba l455d-s5976 laptop
>>
>> a new problem has developed after 1st updating of 6.8.
>>
>> regular user is not able to o
good morning jtj.
thank you for replying.
On 07/21/16 06:56, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote:
> El 21/7/16 a las 8:53, geo.inbox.ignore escribió:
>
>> greetings to all.
>>
>> centos = 6.8 current
>> system = toshiba l455d-s5976 laptop
>>
>> a new problem has developed after 1st updating of 6.8.
>
El 21/7/16 a las 8:53, geo.inbox.ignore escribió:
greetings to all.
centos = 6.8 current
system = toshiba l455d-s5976 laptop
a new problem has developed after 1st updating of 6.8.
regular user is not able to open kde desktop, can open
gnome desktop.
root user can open either kde or gnome des
Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> John, Nate, Daniel.
>
> Thank you, I will see if ProFTP has its own user system I can use as
> they are just uploading web content, I dont need them to be accounts
> on the system.
>
how would you sort out file ownership in such a system? everything
owne
John, Nate, Daniel.
Thank you, I will see if ProFTP has its own user system I can use as
they are just uploading web content, I dont need them to be accounts
on the system.
This list is awesome BTW, never has any group been so helpful! I am
really learning and I dont think I will go back to
-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of nate
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:35 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Users
Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am confused about users. IIRC, ftp users are just ordinary users on
&
nate wrote:
> Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am confused about users. IIRC, ftp users are just ordinary users on
>> the system (/etc/passwd)
>>
>> Is there an add user wizard from the command-line?
>>
>
> Quick way is typically:
> adduser
> passwd
>
>
actually, u
Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am confused about users. IIRC, ftp users are just ordinary users on
> the system (/etc/passwd)
>
> Is there an add user wizard from the command-line?
Quick way is typically:
adduser
passwd
> I dont quite get all of the steps to add a user, dont le
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, MHR wrote:
> I am running CentOS 5.2 with all the latest updates with the GNOME DE
> and k3b. I put a DVD in the tray and tried to make a copy, but k3b
> says it can't copy an encrypted disk.
>
> So, I installed libdvdcss from rpmforge:
>
> libdvdcss.i386
2008/9/16 Bob Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have vsftp chrooted so that users can only come into their home directory.
>
> I have a few virtual hosts.
>
> I have the websites in the home directory of the intial user for each site.
>
> So the sites look like this.
>
> /home/user1/html
> /home/use
Clint Dilks wrote:
Hiep Nguyen wrote:
hi all, i just installed centos 5 with minimal options. i don't have
gui yet, how do i get to see all users & groups created on my box?
thanks,
t. hiep
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.ce
Hiep Nguyen wrote:
hi all, i just installed centos 5 with minimal options. i don't have
gui yet, how do i get to see all users & groups created on my box?
thanks,
t. hiep
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Hiep Nguyen wrote:
hi all, i just installed centos 5 with minimal options. i don't
have gui yet, how do i get to see all users & groups created on my
box?
The old-fashioned way:
cat /etc/passwd
cat /etc/group
The PAM-friendly way:
getent passwd
getent group
-
64 matches
Mail list logo
