2009/10/14 John R. Dennison :
> Because advising someone to run with known vulnerabilities
> is conducive to maintaining the integrity of critical
> systems?
If those vulnerabilities put your servers at risk in the environment
that you use them, then that would qualify as *nee
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:51:27PM +0100, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
>
> Do you *need* to upgrade? If the machines are running anything
> critical, I would be tempted to leave them with 5.2.
Because advising someone to run with known vulnerabilities
is conducive to maintaining the
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 19:51 +0100, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> 2009/10/14 Ron Loftin :
> > I have some customer machines that have not been updated for some time,
> > and are still on CentOS 5.2.
>
> Do you *need* to upgrade? If the machines are running anything
> critical, I would be tempted to
2009/10/14 Ron Loftin :
> I have some customer machines that have not been updated for some time,
> and are still on CentOS 5.2.
Do you *need* to upgrade? If the machines are running anything
critical, I would be tempted to leave them with 5.2.
Ben
___
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
>
> I have some customer machines that have not been updated for some time,
> and are still on CentOS 5.2. While reading the release notes for 5.4, I
> have not yet seen anything that looks like it needs attention, but are
> there any known issue
5 matches
Mail list logo
