On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:48:51AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/30/2015 8:13 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >No snipping with bottom posting is worse than any top posting,
> >IMHO. It wastes space and time and is equally bad in digests. But
> >you're not likely to get the worst offenders to change.
On 7/30/2015 8:13 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
No snipping with bottom posting is worse than any top posting, IMHO.
It wastes space and time and is equally bad in digests. But you're
not likely to get the worst offenders to change.
totally concur but as long as people are going to use cell phones as
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 10:24 AM, Wes James wrote:
>> What’s even more irritating to me than top posting is when someone
>> replies to a message that takes two page scrolls to get to the bottom
>> then there’s only a few words that are unrelated to the actual message!
>> What’s worse, to
On 07/30/2015 10:24 AM, Wes James wrote:
What’s even more irritating to me than top posting is when someone replies to a
message that takes two page scrolls to get to the bottom then there’s only a
few words that are unrelated to the actual message! What’s worse, top posting
or no snipping?
What’s even more irritating to me than top posting is when someone replies to a
message that takes two page scrolls to get to the bottom then there’s only a
few words that are unrelated to the actual message! What’s worse, top posting
or no snipping?
-wes
_
5 matches
Mail list logo
