Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-03 Thread Mathieu Baudier
> It's in the cr repo. I must admit that I had completely missed the introduction of the CR repository: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-August/017689.html http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR Great idea, thanks. Mathieu ___

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-02 Thread John Hodrien
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Voyek, William wrote: > On 09/01/2011 3:20 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> the rpm is already pushed, should be on the mirrors now'ish. > > I cannot find this RPM anywhere on the CentOS mirrors. Am I missing > something? The latest version I can find is > httpd-2.2.3-45.el5.centos

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-02 Thread Voyek, William
On 09/01/2011 3:20 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > the rpm is already pushed, should be on the mirrors now'ish. I cannot find this RPM anywhere on the CentOS mirrors. Am I missing something? The latest version I can find is httpd-2.2.3-45.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm Thanks, William -

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-01 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 14:47 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote: > thus Always Learning spake: > > Please remember excellent CENTOS is a FREE product produced by > > VOLUNTEERS. > First possibility: I don't get your sarcasm. Timo, My comment was not intended to be sarcastic. It was a factual statement

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: > > how about getting a rhel subscription and stop flaming around here? > > just a suggestion... Is that going to help fix the vulnerabilities on the bazillion installed Centos systems whose admins don't read to the end of every thread

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-01 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
Am 01.09.11 14:47, schrieb Timo Schoeler: > thus Always Learning spake: >> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:29 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote: >>> That's exactly what I mean about the 'transparency' aspect. This was a >>> very very big issue with impact on many many machines. Administrators >>> sitting there w

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-01 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Always Learning spake: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:29 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> That's exactly what I mean about the 'transparency' aspect. This was a >> very very big issue with impact on many many machines. Administrators >> sitting there waiting for that update, maybe sleepless because

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-01 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:29 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote: > > That's exactly what I mean about the 'transparency' aspect. This was a > very very big issue with impact on many many machines. Administrators > sitting there waiting for that update, maybe sleepless because > workarounds didn't do what

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-01 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Karanbir Singh spake: > On 09/01/2011 11:15 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> is there any time frame foreseeable for KB providing an update for httpd? > > the rpm is already pushed, should be on the mirrors now'ish. That's exactly what I mean about the 'transparency' aspect. This was a very very

Re: [CentOS] Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)

2011-09-01 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 09/01/2011 11:15 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote: > is there any time frame foreseeable for KB providing an update for httpd? the rpm is already pushed, should be on the mirrors now'ish. > (Given that 5.7 is still to be done, 6.1, etc., and due to the fact > there is "no such thing as a CentOS communi