Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-24 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 23 December 2010 18:40:43 Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Thursday 23 December 2010 16:53:22 Bart Schaefer wrote: > >> LASTFOLDER is informational, procmail sets it immediately before > >> delivering to that folder; if you see LASTFOLD

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-23 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 23 December 2010 16:53:22 Bart Schaefer wrote: >> LASTFOLDER is informational, procmail sets it immediately before >> delivering to that folder; if you see LASTFOLDER in your logs, the >> only way the message should fail to arrive i

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-23 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 23 December 2010 16:53:22 Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > All the recipes work perfectly - it's just those that fall off the end. > > For some reason it overrides the DEFAULT setting in procmailrc. > > I'm seeing messages from you about

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-23 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > All the recipes work perfectly - it's just those that fall off the end. For > some reason it overrides the DEFAULT setting in procmailrc. I'm seeing messages from you about this on the procmail list as well so pardon me if I've got my thread

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-23 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 19:35:33 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 16:51:02 Paul Heinlein wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote: > >> >> I became suspicious that I should

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread m . roth
Anne Wilson wrote: > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 16:51:02 Paul Heinlein wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote: >> > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote: >> >> I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message, >> >> and reading pm.log I discovered t

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 18:35:29 Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > # /etc/procmailrc > > > > > > DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ > > > > Interesting. I don't have an /etc/procmailrc. Are there other things > > you'd recommend to place there? > > That's all I put i

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote: > > # /etc/procmailrc > > > DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ > > Interesting. I don't have an /etc/procmailrc. Are there other things > you'd recommend to place there? That's all I put in there. It may be worthwhile to take a peek at the "Environment variable def

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 17:39:56 Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > > On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > >> > /var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well. > >> > >> There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be > >

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: >> >> > /var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well. >> >> There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be >> "Delivered to command /usr.bin/procmail" which of course is >> co

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread Les Mikesell
On 12/22/2010 11:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > /var/log/maillog will usually supply part of the answer as well. > > There's nothing obvious, at first scan. Everything seems to be > "Delivered to command /usr.bin/procmail" which of course is correct. The > only messages affected are thos which sh

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 16:51:02 Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote: > >> I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message, > >> and reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote: >> I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message, >> and reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had >> been allocated to /var/mail/anne, despite procmailrc

Re: [CentOS] The case of the missing mail

2010-12-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 13:33:10 Anne Wilson wrote: > I became suspicious that I should have received a certain message, and > reading pm.log I discovered that it had indeed arrived and had been > allocated to /var/mail/anne, despite procmailrc telling it that > > MAILDIR=/home/anne/Maildir/