Re: [CentOS] Stripe vs Cylinder alignement...

2009-10-30 Thread Robert Heller
At Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:14:54 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Cylinders are largely logical - even in magnetic disks you have no way > of knowing if the logical cylinder matches up with the physical > construct of a cylinder on the disk medium - in any modern(15 years ?) > disk they won'

Re: [CentOS] Stripe vs Cylinder alignement...

2009-10-30 Thread NiftyCluster Tom Mitchell
On 10/30/09, John Doe wrote: > Hi, > > I modified my kickstart to do some custom partioning and formating in a > pre-install script. > I am trying to align the partitions on the RAID stripe (and format with a > correct stride). > But, sfdisk complains that it does not start/end on a cylinder bound

Re: [CentOS] Stripe vs Cylinder alignement...

2009-10-30 Thread Blake Hudson
Cylinders are largely logical - even in magnetic disks you have no way of knowing if the logical cylinder matches up with the physical construct of a cylinder on the disk medium - in any modern(15 years ?) disk they won't. Don't worry about cylinders, just align your fs to the stripe/sector. O

Re: [CentOS] Stripe vs Cylinder alignement...

2009-10-30 Thread John Doe
> So, for my first partition (96MB): > begin=256 > size = ( ( 96 * 1024 * 2 ) / 8160 ) * 8160 = 195840 sectors > end = 195840 - 1 - 256 = 195583 Oops, I meant: begin = 256 size = 96 * 1024 * 2 = 196608 sectors end = ( ( begin + size ) / 8160 ) * 8160 - 1 = 195839 aligned_size = end