On Sep 22, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
Received: from 45.45.01.01 (EHLO server.myserverhostname.com)
(45.45.01.01)
You should have a PTR record for your IP address that matches the name
that the server has configured in the
define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `server.foo.com')
line
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I don't know what you mean by "some domains". How are you
implementing the domains?
I have a server. It has centos.
I run apache. I have domains on there, websites.. Each is listed in the dns
and some are ip based and some name based.
a mail server needs REVE
> I don't know what you mean by "some domains". How are you
> implementing the domains?
I have a server. It has centos.
I run apache. I have domains on there, websites.. Each is listed in the dns
and some are ip based and some name based.
___
CentO
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Nope, just one server with some domains. One server with the dns, sendmail
> and domains all bundled up in a nice pile.
I don't know what you mean by "some domains". How are you implementing
the domains?
--
rgds
Stephen
___
>
> If these are virtual machines (uml, xen, vmware, whatever)
> then the host could do IP NAT so that traffic _looks_ like
> it's coming from the host (or another of the virtual
> machines). If they're physically seperate boxes then you
> need to arrange for a smart-host type setup and ha
> > The IP address reported is the _actual_ IP address of the
> > machine connecting, not the IP address of the "ehlo"
> > response. You can't masquerade that in sendmail at all.
> I am thinking there is no way then, to use virtual domains and have the mail
> server show up as mail.mydomain.com
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:56:18AM -0400, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> At last a lifeline.
> That would be the canonical hostname right, the $j?
>
> So would you use masquerade or some kind of local_domain setting to make the
> receiving client see the proper information in ehlo relating to the domain
> t
>
> The IP address reported is the _actual_ IP address of the
> machine connecting, not the IP address of the "ehlo"
> response. You can't masquerade that in sendmail at all.
>
> If you set the canonical name (Dj, confDOMAIN_NAME) then your
> machine will pretend to be that name for
> sen
Bob Hoffman wrote:
> At last a lifeline.
Wow fantastic stuff. You would be a star if you followed
some of the tips at
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-September/064533.html
particularly bottom posting.
Thanks,
Josh.
___
CentOS mailing
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Sendmail and headers
>
> > Received: from 45.45.01.01 (EHLO server.myserverhostname.com)
> > (45.45.01.01)
> >
> > Where it should have the ip address of the website and the website
> > mail.website.com...
>
> Received: from 45.45.01.01 (EHLO server.myserverhostname.com) (45.45.01.01)
>
> Where it should have the ip address of the website and the website
> mail.website.com...
This line is added by the RECEIVING machine. The IP address is that which
connected to the receiving machine. The "ehlo" va
11 matches
Mail list logo
