On Friday 18 December 2009 16:55:04 nate wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > do the trick, and I simply didn't know what else to try. In case I meet
> > this
> > again, can you please advise me?
>
> Are you doing anything with NFS? If not then turn off the nfs service,
> and the rpc services
>
> [r.
Anne Wilson wrote:
> do the trick, and I simply didn't know what else to try. In case I meet
> this
> again, can you please advise me?
Are you doing anything with NFS? If not then turn off the nfs service,
and the rpc services
[r...@dc1-rhel5-32build001:~]# chkconfig --list | grep "\(nfs\|rpc
From: Anne Wilson
> I run chkrootkit daily. For the first time I've got reports of a problem -
>
> Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 1008)
>
> The page http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/checking-bindshell-infected-
> ports-1008/ suggests that this might be a false positive, so I ra
Anne Wilson wrote:
I run chkrootkit daily. For the first time I've got reports of a problem -
Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 1008)
The page http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/checking-bindshell-infected-
ports-1008/ suggests that this might be a false positive, so I ran 'netstat
On Monday 23 March 2009 18:59:51 Steve Huff wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > OK - I'm thick. I've looked at that page and seen only what I'm
> > already
> > familiar with. Please, in plain English, how do I set ssh to come
> > in on port
> > 22022 (service called ext-s
On Monday 23 March 2009 19:33:58 JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:37 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > Her's another example it will do what you want, your just
> > > misunderstanding it. I have 2 customers that use Netgear routers. I
> > > think your not setting up the Nat - Add Page.
> > > h
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:37 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Her's another example it will do what you want, your just
> > misunderstanding it. I have 2 customers that use Netgear routers. I
> > think your not setting up the Nat - Add Page.
> > http://portforward.com/english/routers/port_forwarding/
On Monday 23 March 2009 18:59:51 Steve Huff wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > OK - I'm thick. I've looked at that page and seen only what I'm
> > already
> > familiar with. Please, in plain English, how do I set ssh to come
> > in on port
> > 22022 (service called ext-s
On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
OK - I'm thick. I've looked at that page and seen only what I'm
already
familiar with. Please, in plain English, how do I set ssh to come
in on port
22022 (service called ext-ssh already set up for that) to be
forwarded to
192.168.0.xx por
On Monday 23 March 2009 16:57:45 JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 16:26 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Monday 23 March 2009 15:29:53 JohnS wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
> > > > > Michael Simp
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 16:26 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009 15:29:53 JohnS wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
> > > > Michael Simpson wrote:
> > > > >> GRC reports that ports are stealt
On Monday 23 March 2009 15:29:53 JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
> > > Michael Simpson wrote:
> > > >> GRC reports that ports are stealthed
> > > >
> > > > Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rath
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
> > Michael Simpson wrote:
> > >> GRC reports that ports are stealthed
> > >
> > > Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for open
> > > ports
> >
> > What adv
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
> Michael Simpson wrote:
> >> GRC reports that ports are stealthed
> >
> > Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for open
> > ports
>
> What advantages do they have, in your opinion?
>
> >> there a better way than o
jk...@kinz.org wrote:
> You are visiting the Otis Public Library in Norwich CT. They have Linux
> based public workstations (w/Internet access).
> (http://www.otislibrarynorwich.org/index.htm)
Do you trust the library, all of their employees, and every person who
has ever used the computer you
On Friday 26 December 2008 21:18:27 Warren Young wrote:
> The other portable is a little Asus Eee 701, reformatted to run Ubuntu
> Eee. (Since renamed Easy Peasy...wince...) I haven't yet got it doing
> full disk encryption, so I password-protect its ssh key.
Since I can't encrypt the whole disk
jk...@kinz.org wrote:
>
> Hi Warren, Nice explanation.
Thanks!
> I would like to ask what you
> recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
> anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to be traveling and
> they know they will have to login from machines they have no
> control
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> I again offer you my "solution", which is to take with me "Live CDs"
>> for CentOS 5.2 and Knoppix. I reboot the box in an Internet cafe, from
>> a Live CD, do what I need/want to do, and when I am done, I remove the
>> Live CD and reboot t
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:27:05 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Once upon a time, MIT had a little red button on their public SUN
> systems. You pushed the button and got a assured clean boot from their
> protected server (and I know the people protecting those servers, they
> were never compromis
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 25 December 2008 11:12:19 Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bill Campbell
>> wrote:
>>
>>
Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
anywhere
John R Pierce wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
>>
>>
>>
Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
anywhere on the internet. Say they are go
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
>
>
>>> Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
>>> recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
>>> anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to be traveling and
>>> they know they
On Thursday 25 December 2008 11:12:19 Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bill Campbell
> wrote:
>
> >>Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
> >>recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
> >>anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
>
>
>>> Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
>>> recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
>>> anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to be traveling and
>>> they know they
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
>>Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
>>recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
>>anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to be traveling and
>>they know they will have to login from machines the
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008, jk...@kinz.org wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 09:43:19AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008, jk...@kinz.org wrote:
>> >Top posting to ask a question regarding the article below:
>> > Summary: Enable ssh to allow login from any random point on
>> > the intern
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 09:43:19AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008, jk...@kinz.org wrote:
> >Top posting to ask a question regarding the article below:
> > Summary: Enable ssh to allow login from any random point on
> > the internet
>
> I always have my laptop with me,
An exce
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 17:43:19 Bill Campbell wrote:
> In summary, I would be extremely reluctant to allow access from public
> machines where there is no assurance how much malware is running on top of
> the Microsoft virus, Windows.
When I said that I had used hotel computers I meant fo
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008, jk...@kinz.org wrote:
>Top posting to ask a question regarding the article below:
>
>Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
>recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
>anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to be traveling and
>they
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 14:30:26 jk...@kinz.org wrote:
> Top posting to ask a question regarding the article below:
>
> Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
> recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
> anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to be
Top posting to ask a question regarding the article below:
Hi Warren, Nice explanation. I would like to ask what you
recommend people do if they want to be able to ssh in from
anywhere on the internet. Say they are going to be traveling and
they know they will have to login from machines they ha
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
> Michael Simpson wrote:
First, thanks to all who replied. I'll try to remember and consider all that
has been said.
> >> GRC reports that ports are stealthed
> >
> > Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for ope
On 12/23/08, Warren Young wrote:
> Michael Simpson wrote:
> >> GRC reports that ports are stealthed
> >
> > Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for open
> > ports
>
> What advantages do they have, in your opinion?
>
they're not grc
auditmypc has been mentioned as an
Michael Simpson wrote:
>> GRC reports that ports are stealthed
>
> Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for open
> ports
What advantages do they have, in your opinion?
>> there a better way than opening port 143?
>
> ssh tunnelling?
I agree, though the default Cent
John Doe wrote:
>> Then, I want to read from my own IMAP server when I'm away from home. Is
>> there a better way than opening port 143?
>
> The easiest would be if you had a fixed external IP and only allow it; but I
> guess that won't be the case.
> Maybe using an other port than 143? But I
Anne Wilson wrote on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:06:01 +:
> My LAN is behind a Netgear router, which does NAT. On the CentOS server I
> have fail2ban running. This morning my router reported 3 different IPs
> attempting to send UDP packets to port 38950,
which is per se nothing to worry about an
On 12/23/08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> My LAN is behind a Netgear router, which does NAT. On the CentOS server I
> have fail2ban running. This morning my router reported 3 different IPs
> attempting to send UDP packets to port 38950, Since each address is only seen
> 4-5 times, I presume that fail2b
> Then, I want to read from my own IMAP server when I'm away from home. Is
> there a better way than opening port 143?
The easiest would be if you had a fixed external IP and only allow it; but I
guess that won't be the case.
Maybe using an other port than 143? But I don't think that would foo
38 matches
Mail list logo
