On 02/12/2011 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/12/11 6:54 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
OTOH, for mere backup using rsync and ssh might work even better and be
somewhat simplier.
>>>
>>> except that provides no point in time restoration ability.
>>>
>>> I prefer backup schemes that
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:54:17AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> > On 02/11/11 5:12 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> >>
>> >> OTOH, for mere backup using rsync and ssh might work
On 2/12/11 6:54 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>>> OTOH, for mere backup using rsync and ssh might work even better and be
>>> somewhat simplier.
>>
>> except that provides no point in time restoration ability.
>>
>> I prefer backup schemes that use dump/restore to do occasional full and
>> regular
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:54:17AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 02/11/11 5:12 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> >>
> >> OTOH, for mere backup using rsync and ssh might work even better and be
> >> somewhat simplier.
> >
> > except that pr
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/11/11 5:12 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>>
>> OTOH, for mere backup using rsync and ssh might work even better and be
>> somewhat simplier.
>
> except that provides no point in time restoration ability.
>
> I prefer backup schemes that use
On Friday, February 11, 2011 08:14:54 pm John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/11/11 5:12 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> > OTOH, for mere backup using rsync and ssh might work even better and be
> > somewhat simplier.
>
> except that provides no point in time restoration ability.
>
> I prefer backup schemes t
On 02/11/11 5:12 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> OTOH, for mere backup using rsync and ssh might work even better and be
> somewhat simplier.
except that provides no point in time restoration ability.
I prefer backup schemes that use dump/restore to do occasional full and
regular incremental backup
At Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:43:46 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> Thinking of setup a backup process between two Centos systems.
> One will backup to the other one. For those people out there with
> Centos production severs what would you recommend to use
>
> Samba or NFS
>
>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/11/2011 5:01 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote:
>> Thanks, I think I was trying to kill a fly with a Bazuca
>
> Someone already mentioned rsync for copies, but if you want to keep a
> longer history of backups online you might like backuppc.
> http
On 2/11/2011 5:01 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote:
> Thanks, I think I was trying to kill a fly with a Bazuca
Someone already mentioned rsync for copies, but if you want to keep a
longer history of backups online you might like backuppc.
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes.
Thanks, I think I was trying to kill a fly with a Bazuca
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:43:46PM -0500, Alfredo Perez wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Thinking of setup a backup process between two Centos systems.
> > One will backup to the other o
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 05:43:46PM -0500, Alfredo Perez wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thinking of setup a backup process between two Centos systems.
> One will backup to the other one. For those people out there with
> Centos production severs what would you recommend to use
Do you mean you want the backup
> Thinking of setup a backup process between two Centos systems.
> One will backup to the other one. For those people out there with
> Centos production severs what would you recommend to use
>
> Samba or NFS
>
rsync+ssh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
13 matches
Mail list logo
