On 1/29/09, Rob Kampen wrote:
.
> Does anyone use SELinux on their work-station i.e. the place where you try
> things out, debug things etc?? or is it really only for stable systems where
> not many OS changes and new program trials occur?
> I know that asterisk doesn't play nice with SELinux, eve
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:00 -0500, Rob Kampen wrote:
Last resort was the 'touch /.autorelabel' and reboot. This took nearly
an hour but once it came up all was well.
Thanks for the pointers Filipe.
At what point would it be safe to go to enforcing? What logs should I
be i
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:00 -0500, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Last resort was the 'touch /.autorelabel' and reboot. This took nearly
> an hour but once it came up all was well.
> Thanks for the pointers Filipe.
> At what point would it be safe to go to enforcing? What logs should I
> be inspecting for war
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
2009/1/28 Rob Kampen :
I'm seeing this every hour when the hourly cron job runs
NULL security context for user, but SELinux in permissive mode, continuing
Try to use "ps -Z" to see if all your processes have appropriate
security contexts. It's unlikel
Hi,
2009/1/28 Rob Kampen :
> I'm seeing this every hour when the hourly cron job runs
> NULL security context for user, but SELinux in permissive mode, continuing
Try to use "ps -Z" to see if all your processes have appropriate
security contexts. It's unlikely (impossible?) that one of them will
5 matches
Mail list logo
