Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Sorry for hi-jacking this thread, but it's very interesting. What's the
> difference, apart from the speed & price between SAS & SATAII?
On the most basic level I think of SAS as basically the new
SCSI, and SATA II as the new PATA.
SCSI = smaller, faster
SATA II = bigger, sl
>There was a thread about the MTBF of various types of drives, linking
>to articles about the experiences of Google.com, here in this mailing
>list, probably 1 or 2 years ago. As I recall, they found the MTBF
>between different types of drives to be about the same?
That's exactly what I was refer
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Sorry for hi-jacking this thread, but it's very interesting. What's the
>>difference, apart from the speed & price between SAS & SATAII?
>
> SAS is more enterprise geared, relating to speed and MTBU (probably a load of
>
> >Sorry for hi-jacking this thread, but it's very interesting. What's the
> >difference, apart from the speed & price between SAS & SATAII?
>
> SAS is more enterprise geared, relating to speed and MTBU (probably a load of
> crap on that point)
> and SATA is cheaper and does not perform as we
>Sorry for hi-jacking this thread, but it's very interesting. What's the
>difference, apart from the speed & price between SAS & SATAII?
SAS is more enterprise geared, relating to speed and MTBU (probably a load of
crap on that point)
and SATA is cheaper and does not perform as well, supposedly
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:44 PM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
> > Anyone got any real world info they can share? I need 3.5" SATA II at
> least
> > 12 drives behind SAS,
> > I am not concerned about space and could use multiple 1u chassis if I had
> > to.
>
> What abo
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Anyone got any real world info they can share? I need 3.5" SATA II at least
> 12 drives behind SAS,
> I am not concerned about space and could use multiple 1u chassis if I had
> to.
What about this?
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13045_na/13045_na.html
T
>I assume you're talking about the MSA60?
Yup
>We have several of those installed
>and haven't seen any bottle necks there. Even the fastest SATA drives fall
>short of the 150MB/sec max SATA I throughput. And if you could push the
>1.5Gb/sec on the SATA side, then the SAS side with a 4x port (4x3
Hi,
I assume you're talking about the MSA60? We have several of those installed
and haven't seen any bottle necks there. Even the fastest SATA drives fall
short of the 150MB/sec max SATA I throughput. And if you could push the
1.5Gb/sec on the SATA side, then the SAS side with a 4x port (4x3Gb/
Joseph L. Casale schrieb:
I need to replace a slow HP MSA20 that’s a bottleneck right now (We
are an HP shop).
HP’s only option with 3.5” SATA drives is stuck at SATA I behind a SAS
controller.
Dell makes an MD1000 that claims SATA II speeds behind a SAS Perc 5/E
(Don’t know anything about
10 matches
Mail list logo
