James B. Byrne wrote:
> 1. Physically segmenting my LAN
> 2. Having to commission an additional host or reconfigure an existing host
> to multi-homed.
That's the beauty of bridging, *NO* changes are required to
your lan. There are no IP addresses on the firewall's interfaces.
Worst case you can
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM, James B. Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On : Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:50:37 +0200, "Mr Shunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
> [snip]
>
>>> Presently the setting for rip is:
>>>
>>> router rip
>>> version 2
>>> passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
>>> net
James B. Byrne wrote:
> I will deal with NAT issues for these hosts at a later time. For now I am
> concerned only with hosts that should not reach or be reached from the
> public Internet in any case and therefore do not need a public IP or NAT.
You can accomplish this much easier by simply usi
3 matches
Mail list logo
