Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2

2008-07-10 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 7/9/08, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:42 PM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The next thing I suggest is stopping evolution, and killing all >> evolution processes on the system and starting evolution again and >> see if that fixes it. I have killed Evolution a

Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2

2008-07-09 Thread MHR
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:42 PM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The next thing I suggest is stopping evolution, and killing all > evolution processes on the system and starting evolution again and > see if that fixes it. > Well, it didn't /fix/ the problem, but it did restore the original beha

Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2

2008-07-09 Thread nate
MHR wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Maybe it's not looking where you think it is looking.. >> >> I'd run the app with strace to find out what files it is attempting >> to open. >> >> What I do is: strace -fF 1>/tmp/strace.log 2>&1 >> > > I got a ton o

Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2

2008-07-09 Thread MHR
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe it's not looking where you think it is looking.. > > I'd run the app with strace to find out what files it is attempting > to open. > > What I do is: strace -fF 1>/tmp/strace.log 2>&1 > I got a ton of output, but there is n

Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2

2008-07-09 Thread nate
MHR wrote: > So I'm stumped - I own every single directory down the path to the > addressbook, and the addressbook itself, and I have write rights to > all of them. Maybe it's not looking where you think it is looking.. I'd run the app with strace to find out what files it is attempting to open.