Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-12 Thread Josh Donovan
Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They should have stuck with the "when it's ready" response instead of > telling us the "5th or 6th", then "Monday night". They created greater > anticipation by suggesting an actual time line. And greater > frustration by missing it. "When it's ready" alway

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-12 Thread MHR
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip. > > "Are we there yet?" > > "NO" > "Are we there yet?" > > "NO" > "Are we there yet?" > > "NO" > "Are we there yet?" > > "NO" > "Are we there yet?

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-12 Thread William Warren
Scott Silva wrote: on 9-12-2008 2:54 AM Josh Donovan spake the following: Karanbir Singh wrote: The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for i386/x86_64 ) Any update? Starting to sound like when my children were

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-12 Thread Jeff
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 9-12-2008 2:54 AM Josh Donovan spake the following: >> >> Karanbir Singh wrote: >> >>> The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right >>> now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for >>> i3

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-03 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following: >> >> Hi, >> i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 >> Thank you, >> Best regards, >> Adrian >> > 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is pr

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-03 Thread Ralph Angenendt
nate wrote: > David Hrbáè wrote: > > > Glad to see some info and not only typical "when it's done it's done". > > We are enterprise distro, so I guess we should inform the community on > > We = RHEL? We == CentOS. > Last I checked CentOS wasn't supported by most of the enterprise > things out t

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-02 Thread nate
David Hrbáè wrote: > Glad to see some info and not only typical "when it's done it's done". > We are enterprise distro, so I guess we should inform the community on We = RHEL? Last I checked CentOS wasn't supported by most of the enterprise things out there(though sometimes you can get lucky).

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-02 Thread David Hrbáč
Scott Silva napsal(a): > 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably > in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a > million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use > the hardware available. > > When it is ready and synce

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-02 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Matt wrote: > What changes will be in CentOS 4.7 vs. 4.6? http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS4.7 Cheers, Ralph pgpINMiAVvyBg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-02 Thread Matt
> 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in > the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million > dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware > available. What changes will be in CentOS 4.7 vs. 4.6? I would

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

2008-09-02 Thread Mag Gam
where can we get ISOs? I can test for VirtualBox atleast. If there is a problem I will submit a bug. On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following: >> >> Hi, >> i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 >> Thank