Re: [CentOS] Re: PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

2008-06-25 Thread admin
Agree with everything you're saying about bleeding edge distros. Having written quite a bit of PHP, however, I think its fair to say that most developers are fully aware that software is always evolving and probably believe that you may as well write for the latest version because before long

Re: [CentOS] Re: PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

2008-06-24 Thread Donald Buchan
I changed to linux a couple of years ago for a bunch of reasons. WGA was one of them. Being noob at the time -- still think I am today -- I had someone do it for me. They were going to put CentOS 4.4 in, but at the last minute, they put in Fedora 5. Apparently, the -devel fork. What a disaster

Re: [CentOS] Re: PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

2008-06-24 Thread John R Pierce
Tony Mountifield wrote: I always get frustrated with apps requiring the latest and greatest versions of PHP, etc., before they are made available for the major distributions. Is it that the very newest feature is really indispensable and the app can't possibly make do without it, or just because

Re: [CentOS] RE: php 5.2

2007-09-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
Melinda Odom wrote: > Hi, > > seems to have a lot of security fixes: > http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.2.0 > > Version 5.2.0 was orginally released 02-Nov-2006. > > What is the process and time frame for released software to be available in > an operating system? I am not familiar with thi

Re: [CentOS] RE: php 5.2

2007-09-11 Thread John Hinton
Melinda Odom wrote: Hi, seems to have a lot of security fixes: http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.2.0 Version 5.2.0 was orginally released 02-Nov-2006. What is the process and time frame for released software to be available in an operating system? I am not familiar with this. Sincerely, M