Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

2009-01-31 Thread John
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rob Kampen > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 3:21 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY > > Sorry for the delayed response, need

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

2009-01-31 Thread Rob Kampen
and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Brett Serkez Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:55 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

2009-01-29 Thread John
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Tim Nelson > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:37 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY > > It is widely known that Quickbooks has

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

2009-01-29 Thread John
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rob Kampen > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:30 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY > >

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY [OT]

2009-01-29 Thread Rob Kampen
Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Craig White Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 15:52 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 13

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

2009-01-29 Thread Rob Kampen
Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Brett Serkez Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:55 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY [OT]

2009-01-29 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Craig White > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 15:52 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY > > On Thu, 2

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

2009-01-29 Thread Craig White
gt; Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tim Nelson > > wrote: > > > It is widely known that Quickbooks has a horrible storage > > engine, "requires" Windows to host multiuser access, e

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

2009-01-29 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Brett Serkez > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:55 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY > > On Thu,

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

2009-01-29 Thread Brett Serkez
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: > It is widely known that Quickbooks has a horrible storage engine, "requires" > Windows to host multiuser access, etc. However, I've successfully been > storing QuickBooks files on Samba shares at a handful of locations with no > real issues