On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:31:06 -0800
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> How about this one?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735935
> and
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1318.html
Those are public and readable.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.c
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and
>> has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=72553
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and
> has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725536
You are not authorized to access bug #725536. To see thi
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are
> configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config,
> same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host
> name:
>
> % df -P |
4 matches
Mail list logo
