On Wed, May 20, 2009 8:15 pm, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 05/21/2009 12:59 AM, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
>> I am an RHCE with, among other things, 20 years of Unix experience.
>> How exactly can I contribute, aside from answering occasional question
>> on the mailing list?
>
> Current requirements ar
On 05/21/2009 12:59 AM, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> I am an RHCE with, among other things, 20 years of Unix experience. How
> exactly can I contribute, aside from answering occasional question on the
> mailing list?
Current requirements are actually quite developer heavy -> howse your
python foo
On Wed, May 20, 2009 7:04 pm, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 05/20/2009 11:55 PM, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
>> Would it be possible to increase the number of developers? Is there a
>> way
>> additional bodies can be put to work to relieve some of the pressure off
>> of the current team members?
>
> The
On 05/20/2009 11:55 PM, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> Would it be possible to increase the number of developers? Is there a way
> additional bodies can be put to work to relieve some of the pressure off
> of the current team members?
There are a lot of things going on around the edges that could use
On Wed, May 20, 2009 6:46 pm, Scott Silva wrote:
> It seems that Johnny did a lot of work on 4's updates, and now with him
> MIA, the load has to fall on somebody else (Karanbir right now). CentOS
> doesn't have that many devels that the loss of one doesn't cause a
> profound impact.
Would it be p
On 05/20/2009 11:46 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> It seems that Johnny did a lot of work on 4's updates, and now with him MIA,
> the load has to fall on somebody else (Karanbir right now). CentOS doesn't
> have that many devels that the loss of one doesn't cause a profound impact.
A lot of the work has
on 5-20-2009 3:19 PM Akemi Yagi spake the following:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, nate
> wrote:
>> Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>>> I think the point is that there must be something very wrong/broken if
>>> a) security updates are missing for over a month, and b) people don't
>>> even like to ask f
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, nate wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote:
>
>> I think the point is that there must be something very wrong/broken if
>> a) security updates are missing for over a month, and b) people don't
>> even like to ask for fear of offending someone, and c) no one really
>> talks abo
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> We can't be the only ones still using C4 i386.
>
> indeed not. quite a lot of our development/test systems are Centos 3
> and 4 i386. Many of them are hardware that doesn't support am64
Yes, my own servers (not many -- nevertheless) are
> We can't be the only ones still using C4 i386.
indeed not. quite a lot of our development/test systems are Centos 3
and 4 i386. Many of them are hardware that doesn't support am64
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.o
Ned Slider wrote:
> I think the point is that there must be something very wrong/broken if
> a) security updates are missing for over a month, and b) people don't
> even like to ask for fear of offending someone, and c) no one really
> talks about it.
>
> One of the projects stated goals has alway
Ned Slider wrote:
> nate wrote:
>> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>>> We can't be the only ones still using C4 i386. Some of the outstanding
>>> security updates are rated critical; maybe people just don't realize
>>> how many unpatched vulnerabilities there are at this point.
>> I run C4 i386, though my sys
nate wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> We can't be the only ones still using C4 i386. Some of the outstanding
>> security updates are rated critical; maybe people just don't realize
>> how many unpatched vulnerabilities there are at this point.
>
> I run C4 i386, though my systems are on trusted ne
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> We can't be the only ones still using C4 i386. Some of the outstanding
> security updates are rated critical; maybe people just don't realize
> how many unpatched vulnerabilities there are at this point.
I run C4 i386, though my systems are on trusted networks whose
only servi
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> There are a few updates pending, I am going to look into this today. For
>>> both c4 and c5. We should be all caught up within the next 24 hrs.
>> Any update on this is greatly appreciated. I'm asking because of this
>> forum post [1]:
>
On 05/19/2009 12:10 AM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> And now, upstream 4.8 is released... who will be handling this one?
> Karanbir?
The announcements came through last night, however the packages and isos
had not come through when I looked last.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@ic
On 05/18/2009 08:23 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> Any update on this is greatly appreciated. I'm asking because of this
> forum post [1]:
Should be there today
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-18-2009 3:18 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Akemi Yagi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Karanbir Singh
>>> wrote:
>>>
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> I recently noticed t
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-18-2009 3:18 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Akemi Yagi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Karanbir Singh
>>> wrote:
>>>
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> I recently noticed tha
on 5-18-2009 3:18 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Akemi Yagi
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Karanbir Singh
>> wrote:
>>> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
I recently noticed that Thunderbird updates are missing from CentOS 5.
>>> There are a
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>>> I recently noticed that Thunderbird updates are missing from CentOS 5.
>>
>> There are a few updates pending, I am going to look into this today. For
>> b
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I recently noticed that Thunderbird updates are missing from CentOS 5.
>
> There are a few updates pending, I am going to look into this today. For
> both c4 and c5. We should be all caught up with
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently noticed that Thunderbird updates are missing from CentOS 5.
>
There are a few updates pending, I am going to look into this today. For
both c4 and c5. We should be all caught up within the next 24 hrs.
- KB
___
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> CentOS Developers, could you please build the RPMs for the latest
> version 2.0.0.21, and investigate why the issue with 2.0.0.19 not
> being present in the "updates" repo 5.3 happened, and why the new
> package 2.0.0.21 was not rebuil
24 matches
Mail list logo
