On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> On 6/21/10, Jane Curry wrote:
>>
>> If you want further help, please ask!
>>
>
>
> Havwe you tried Zabbix, the NextGen NMS?
>
+1 to Zabbix
LAMP software, agent for all plataforms, script friendly, SNMP, IPMI,
all t
On 6/21/2010 11:27 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Has anyone looked at using icinga ?
>
> The forums are nearly dead, doesn't look like much of the Nagios
> folk jumped ship yet. Archives show next to no activity.
>
> Frankly, if I am migrating away from Nagios, I would likely be compelled
> to put
On 6/22/2010 6:06 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 21/06/2010 18:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I didn't know about that, but the first googled hit says you are
>> supposed to be able to write reusable tests in a human-readable language
>> which sounds way too unrealistic to ever work. And I want a tool
On 21/06/2010 18:05, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I didn't know about that, but the first googled hit says you are
> supposed to be able to write reusable tests in a human-readable language
> which sounds way too unrealistic to ever work. And I want a tool that
> understands network equipment natively
On 22/06/2010 00:52, Phil Manuel wrote:
> Has anyone looked at using icinga ? I know it replaces the front end of
> nagios, and uses the same (slightly modified ?) backend, using the same
> plugins.
>
Icinga is an interesting project, and there is work going on under the
hood to make it a more
>Has anyone looked at using icinga ?
The forums are nearly dead, doesn't look like much of the Nagios
folk jumped ship yet. Archives show next to no activity.
Frankly, if I am migrating away from Nagios, I would likely be compelled
to put any effort into a significant improvement like Zenoss or O
Greetings,
On 6/21/10, Jane Curry wrote:
>
> If you want further help, please ask!
>
Havwe you tried Zabbix, the NextGen NMS?
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Original Message -
>
>> Did you consider opennms - and if so was there a reason for not using
>> it? It has some integration for provisioning, but I'm not exactly sure
>> how it works and the latest release made some changes.
>
> its on the list of things I want to get to one day, not
On 6/21/2010 10:01 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> Did you consider opennms - and if so was there a reason for not using
>> it? It has some integration for provisioning, but I'm not exactly sure
>> how it works and the latest release made some changes.
>
> its on the list of things I want to get to
On 6/21/2010 8:57 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
>> Also OpenNMS has had a lot of development in the last couple of years.
>> Maps are in the core code, much more configuration can be done through the
>> web interface
>
> All good stuff. But there's a big trade off. Web-based GUIs get coupled with
On 21/06/2010 15:47, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Did you consider opennms - and if so was there a reason for not using
> it? It has some integration for provisioning, but I'm not exactly sure
> how it works and the latest release made some changes.
its on the list of things I want to get to one day,
On 6/21/2010 9:24 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 20/06/2010 10:20, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> of but dont seem keen on moving it forward. Which has the affect that
>>> everything on the management side ends up being point and click on a web
>>> interface ~ massive waste of time and counter producti
On 21/06/2010 10:48, Jane Curry wrote:
> On the Zenoss front, my main winges were the quality and reliability of
> the documentation and the code.
The other problem with Zenos is that its extremely slow, regularly fails
to guarantee schedules and needs lots of resources.
I'm a firm believer in
On 20/06/2010 10:20, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> of but dont seem keen on moving it forward. Which has the affect that
>> everything on the management side ends up being point and click on a web
>> interface ~ massive waste of time and counter productive.
>>
>
> Care to talk a bit more about this
> As Jane's paper makes clear, Nagios less the networking tool, and more the
> extensible way to monitor specific systems and applications. If hand editing
> configuration files scares you, it's not for you. But anything that's trying
> to go fully GUI these days goes XML. And if hand editing conf
> Jane Curry wrote:
> > I'd try Zenoss. I wrote a big paper comparing Nagios, OpenNMS and
> > Zenoss (
> > http://www.skills-1st.co.uk/papers/jane/open_source_mgmt_options.html )
Thanks for sharing that, Jane. Great paper.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:40:10AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Also Op
Jane Curry wrote:
> I'd try Zenoss. I wrote a big paper comparing Nagios, OpenNMS and
> Zenoss (
> http://www.skills-1st.co.uk/papers/jane/open_source_mgmt_options.html )
> - it's nearly 2 years back now but many of the basics are the same.
> At that time, I plumped for Zenoss but, to be fair,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:24:41PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 06/19/2010 09:39 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> > It is very responsive. in forums, mailing lists, bugzilla, etc.
> >
>
> I can offer some insight into this.
>
> We recently moved a 150 node network from cacti / nagios / mon
On 06/19/2010 09:39 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> It is very responsive. in forums, mailing lists, bugzilla, etc.
>
I can offer some insight into this.
We recently moved a 150 node network from cacti / nagios / monit to
Zabbix; Its been an exceptional mixed bag. The API is extremely basic,
Greetings,
On 6/18/10, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I have to rebuild a new Nagios box and thought this might be a good time
> to migrate away.
Try Zabbix.
It is very responsive. in forums, mailing lists, bugzilla, etc.
Important: try trunk
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
On 6/18/2010 12:06 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> It depends on what you are doing, but if it is mostly snmp data
>> collection and icmp/tcp application monitoring, OpenNMS will probably do
>> it out of the box with autodiscovery and no client setup. If you have
>> lots of custom nagios client cod
>It depends on what you are doing, but if it is mostly snmp data
>collection and icmp/tcp application monitoring, OpenNMS will probably do
>it out of the box with autodiscovery and no client setup. If you have
>lots of custom nagios client code, you'll probably have to twiddle some
>ugly XML c
>I am a pretty hardcore ZenOSS user.. We use it to monitor over 1000
>devices in different fashions - using a combination of SNMP (Linux), WMI
>(windows) and SSH (Unix/Aix). While there is a slight learning curve to
>get everything working the way you want - it is, in my opinion, the most
>powerfu
On 6/18/2010 10:31 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I have to rebuild a new Nagios box and thought this might be a good time
> to migrate away. I use snmp mostly for everything but with the fork Nagios
> endured I wonder about putting any more effort into the project.
>
> I probably should look at Ope
I am a pretty hardcore ZenOSS user.. We use it to monitor over 1000
devices in different fashions - using a combination of SNMP (Linux), WMI
(windows) and SSH (Unix/Aix). While there is a slight learning curve to
get everything working the way you want - it is, in my opinion, the most
powerful ope
25 matches
Mail list logo
