Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
>> From: John R Pierce
>> On 11/12/10 12:21 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> > that sounds quite likely. some of those modules have two banks on
>>> > the single module, and I seriously dou
Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>>
>>
>> May I recommend looking at the docs that tell you what order the DIMMs
>> need to be put into the board in? If you've got four slots, for example,
>> I'll bet that it's 1 and 2, then 3 and 4, or
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
>
>
>
> May I recommend looking at the docs that tell you what order the DIMMs
> need to be put into the board in? If yo
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list
From: John R Pierce
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
On 11/12/10 12:21 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
> that sounds quite likely. some of those modules have two banks on
On 11/12/10 12:21 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
that sounds quite likely. some of those modules have two banks on the
single module, and I seriously doubt a system is going to like a single
bank and a dual bank module in a dual channel environment.
I got in
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: John R Pierce
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
>
> On 11/12/10 10:46 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>
>> I have a sneaking suspicion that it's the mismatched low and
>>
On 11/12/10 10:46 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
> I have a sneaking suspicion that it's the mismatched low and
> high density memory modules that are the problem?
that sounds quite likely.some of those modules have two banks on the
single module, and I seriously doubt a system is going to like a
> Tested each memory module in DDR1 slot for at least 20
> hours.
>
> Tested each slot with the 512MB module for another 20 hours.
> Should I have used the 1GB module for this?
So it appears that each memory module works fine if it's the
only module installed - in whatever slot.
I found this he
>> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Bob McConnell wrote:
>>
>> _snip_
>>
>>> And make sure you button the cabinet back up, with all covers in place
>>> and put it back on the rack where it normally sits. Running this test
>>> with the case open or sitting in free air is a waste of time unless that
>>> is how th
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Keith Roberts
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
>
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Bob McConnell wrote:
>
> _snip_
>
>> And make sure you button the cabinet back up, with all covers in p
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Bob McConnell wrote:
_snip_
> And make sure you button the cabinet back up, with all covers in place
> and put it back on the rack where it normally sits. Running this test
> with the case open or sitting in free air is a waste of time unless that
> is how the system usually o
Bob McConnell wrote:
> Jake Shipton wrote:
> > Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >> Keith Roberts wrote:
> >>> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
> >>> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
> >>> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
> >> I had a system that st
Jake Shipton wrote:
> On 03/11/10 22:03, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
>>> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
>>> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
>> I had
On 03/11/10 22:03, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
>> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
>> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
>
> I had a system that started c
ors on the memory module. Is it worth
> keeping it running overnight, just to see if temperature changes will afect
> the test?
>
> Regards,
>
> Keith
- Message Text -
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Jack Davies wrote:
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> From: Jack Davi
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
I had a system that started crashing randomly. I ran memtest overnight
(abo
On 11/3/2010 4:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
Yes, I've seen a machine where it ran over a weekend before catching an
error (which
It wouldn't harm you to do this?
Jack
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Keith Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:48 PM
To: centos
Subject: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
I have run one full test and got no error
18 matches
Mail list logo
