Re: [CentOS] Maybe a dumb question, but....

Sam Drinkard wrote on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:19:02 -0500: > Question... is there a kernel for > 5.2 that does not have xen built into it, and if so, where is it? You just have to install without virtualization. If already installed remove that group with yum and reboot. (check grub.conf first, to

Re: [CentOS] Maybe a dumb question, but....

Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Sam Drinkard wrote: > > Question... is there a kernel for > > 5.2 that does not have xen built into it, and if so, where is it? > > The "normal" kernel 2.6.18-92.1.17.el5 does not have xen built into it, > the xen kernel is 2.6.18-

Re: [CentOS] Maybe a dumb question, but....

Sam Drinkard wrote: > Question... is there a kernel for > 5.2 that does not have xen built into it, and if so, where is it? The "normal" kernel 2.6.18-92.1.17.el5 does not have xen built into it, the xen kernel is 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5xen. > Perhaps someone

Re: [CentOS] Maybe a dumb question, but try google....

Sam Drinkard wrote: > Folks, I am totally ignorant about xen, and while I've > been doing a little reading, I've not yet figured out if > xen is running under CentOS or if CentOS is running under > xen on this 5.2 version of CentOS. I do know that the whole > system from the user standpoint is w