Re: [CentOS] IPv6 token with /60 and prefix delegation

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter said: > Right now it's a CentOS 8 system running NetworkManager. The LAN > side is going to run the Kea DHCP server but for now I'm just trying > to get the WAN side going. The typical IPv6 CPU router setup is: - WAN receives Router Advertisement that says there

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 token with /60 and prefix delegation

--On Monday, May 09, 2022 12:16 PM -0500 Ian Pilcher wrote: So right now, you're assigning a /60 address to your LAN interface? If so, you almost certainly shouldn't do that. Instead, you should (as you say) pick a /64 from within the delegated /60 and use that subnet. (The other /64 subnet

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 token with /60 and prefix delegation

On 5/8/22 05:00, Kenneth Porter wrote: I'm trying to figure out how to assign a "static" address that automatically sets the prefix to what the ISP delegates. It seemed like the token system would accomplish that, but reading the kernel source code, I've discovered that tokens only work with a

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 mailing list?

On 10/27/2021 9:24 AM, Benson Muite wrote: There being no end-user IPv6 mailing list, it seems possible to set one up. I'd hoped that DSLReports would have a dedicated sub-forum but no luck. But I did discover that Reddit has one: https://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/ Meanwhile, I found the right

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 mailing list?

Maybe this is helpful: https://www.ietfjournal.org/ietf-support-for-ipv6-deployment/ There is a working group mailing list where you might get an answer: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ipv6/about/ Seminars on IPv6 that may be of interest: www.industrynetcouncil.org/past-webinars https://industr

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 routing preference with multiple default gateways

Ugh. It looks like I need to read through the neighbor discovery RFC to understand how this works: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4861 I did discover that the radvd.conf page includes an entry for AdvDefaultPreference low|medium|high so I can at least set the preference of the backu

Re: [CentOS] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): link is not ready after upgrading to 7.6

Gordon Messmer wrote on 30/12/2018 20:59: Hi, after upgrading to 7.6, kernel 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64, at boot instead of the GUI login screen I got two lines like this: The output you see is probably unrelated to the problem.  Check the output of "systemctl status gdm" and /var/log/Xorg.0.

Re: [CentOS] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): link is not ready after upgrading to 7.6

On 12/25/18 11:54 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: Hi, after upgrading to 7.6, kernel 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64, at boot instead of the GUI login screen I got two lines like this: The output you see is probably unrelated to the problem.  Check the output of "systemctl status gdm" and /var/log/Xorg.0.lo

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 fixed address using ip token

On Thu, 20 Sep 2018, Mark Milhollan wrote: >On Thu, 20 Sep 2018, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> I'm about to publish a fixed IPv6 address and I understand I can use the ip >> token command to lock the host part of the RA-assigned address to a fixed >> value. But I can't see an obvious place to configure

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 fixed address using ip token

On Thu, 20 Sep 2018, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I'm about to publish a fixed IPv6 address and I understand I can use the ip > token command to lock the host part of the RA-assigned address to a fixed > value. But I can't see an obvious place to configure this. It looks like there is no support for

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 addresses order (CentOS6)

On 30 May 2017 at 08:26, Walter H. wrote: > Hello, > in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 I have this > > ... > IPV6INIT=yes > IPV6ADDR=prefix::5 > IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="prefix::2 prefix::3 prefix::4" > IPV6_AUTOCONF=no > IPV6_DEFAULTGW=prefix::1 > IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 > > when I enter i

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 addresses order (CentOS6)

On Wed, May 31, 2017 03:55, Steven Tardy wrote: > >> On May 30, 2017, at 3:26 AM, Walter H. >> wrote: >> >> is there a way to influence the order? > > Not sure what your use of multiple IPs is. . . but I'd probably use an > interface alias instead of secondary. > > https://access.redhat.com/docume

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 addresses order (CentOS6)

> On May 30, 2017, at 3:26 AM, Walter H. wrote: > > is there a way to influence the order? Not sure what your use of multiple IPs is. . . but I'd probably use an interface alias instead of secondary. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guid

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

--On Thursday, February 16, 2017 10:12 AM + Pete Biggs wrote: As I said, you need to look at dhclient configuration and command line options. If you have NetworkManager running then it will be controlling what dhclient does so manual editing the files will not work. Use nmcli to see what'

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 02/16/2017 04:34 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 04:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 02/16/2017 04:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wro

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: > > On 02/16/2017 02:

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 16 February

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> >>> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > On 02/1

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote:

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> >>> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > On 02/1

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

Having used Linode and CentOS for years I have never had a problem quite like this. Sure sounds like the IPv6 is misconfigured in the DHCP server or is in use somewhere. Some things I would try are: 1. Set "Auto configure networking" in your config profile and reboot. 2. Try to assign the adddre

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> >>> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, Al

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, Alice Wonder wrote: https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14570&p=72785

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 00:37 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14570&p=72785 > > I can not figure out what I need to do. > > Apparently according to linode support, the VM is trying to grab an IPv6 > address with some privacy stuff enabled by default causi

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >> >> In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> >>> https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14570&p=72785 >>> >>> I can not figure out what

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, Alice Wonder wrote: https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14570&p=72785 I can not figure out what I need to do. Apparently according to linode support, the VM is trying to

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode

In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581...@domblogger.net>, Alice Wonder wrote: > https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14570&p=72785 > > I can not figure out what I need to do. > > Apparently according to linode support, the VM is trying to grab an IPv6 > address with some privac

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 address configuration and default IPv6 address with CentOS 6.8?

On 15.10.2016 10:42, John R Pierce wrote: On 10/15/2016 1:15 AM, Walter H. wrote: where can I define which IPv6 address is used as source IP, when doing e.g.wget ... ssh ... ... | mail t...@example.com on wget, its --bind-address= on ssh, its -b mail will, af

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 address configuration and default IPv6 address with CentOS 6.8?

On 10/15/2016 1:15 AM, Walter H. wrote: where can I define which IPv6 address is used as source IP, when doing e.g.wget ... ssh ... ... | mail t...@example.com on wget, its --bind-address= on ssh, its -b mail will, afaik, forward the eemail to your local MTA,

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 routing with 2 different prefixes

On 13.09.2016 16:58, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 09/13/2016 12:03 AM, Walter H. wrote: why can only the router do ping6 2001:db8:0815::17 and not the linux box? It's not uncommon for systems to not route packets back out the interface where they were received. What kind of router is this? It

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 routing with 2 different prefixes

On 09/13/2016 12:03 AM, Walter H. wrote: why can only the router do ping6 2001:db8:0815::17 and not the linux box? It's not uncommon for systems to not route packets back out the interface where they were received. What kind of router is this? __

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 updating DNS

Bill Gee writes: > > On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 15:23:52 Mark Tinberg wrote: > > > All of my servers and > > > workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a > > > browser installed can open ipv6.google.com. > > > > > > So far I have figured out that you have to run

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 updating DNS

> I don't need to resolve my hostnames outside my private network, so the EUI64 > addresses will be fine. It'll be a pain collecting them, but that's a > one-time > job and I can write a script to redo them if needed. might I suggest "ping6 ff02::1%em0" or whatever interface is appropriate, to

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 updating DNS

On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 19:06:11 Mark Tinberg wrote: > On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 15:23:52 Mark Tinberg wrote: > > > > All of my servers and > > > > workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a > > > > browser installed can open ipv6.google.com. > > > > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 updating DNS

On 10/01/2014 03:06 PM, Mark Tinberg wrote: On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 15:23:52 Mark Tinberg wrote: All of my servers and workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a browser installed can open ipv6.google.com. So far I have figured out that you have to run TWO in

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 updating DNS

On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 15:23:52 Mark Tinberg wrote: > > > All of my servers and > > > workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a > > > browser installed can open ipv6.google.com. > > > > > > So far I have figured out that you have to run TWO instances of DHCP.

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 only kickstart installs

network is not required, you can also use --initrd-inject trick like this: NAME=$(date +%s)-$RANDOM virt-install --name rhel6PVi-console-$NAME \ --disk /var/lib/libvirt/images/rhel6PV-console-$NAME.img,size=5 \ --nographics \ --vcpus=1 --ram=1024 \ --location /var/www/html/centos.iso \ --initrd-i

Re: [CentOS] IPv6

>> I have setup a CentOS 6.3 VPS with ONLY IPv6 access simply for testing >> at this point. It browses the Internet with lynx fine on most major >> sites that are IPv6 enabled. Yum does not seem to work though. >> Always tries to connect to an IPv4 mirror and gives an error. Is >> there a way sp

Re: [CentOS] IPv6

On 04/24/2013 12:46 PM, Matt wrote: > I have setup a CentOS 6.3 VPS with ONLY IPv6 access simply for testing > at this point. It browses the Internet with lynx fine on most major > sites that are IPv6 enabled. Yum does not seem to work though. > Always tries to connect to an IPv4 mirror and gives

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 auto configuration cannot be disabled from if script.

On 17.02.2013 г. 17:59 ч., Florian La Roche wrote: >> I could have written a script to remove IPV6 link local address but >> there should be a basic option for that. > > You can set: echo "options ipv6 disable=1" > /etc/modprobe.d/noipv6.conf > > But more and more apps then log problems or get conf

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 auto configuration cannot be disabled from if script.

On 2/17/2013 8:10 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > Just to emphasise this as I guess it hasn't been clear enough yet... > > An IPv6 config with no FE80:: address is a broken config. > > This address should always be on an IPv6 enabled interface, being generated > automatically, and is not the same thing

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 auto configuration cannot be disabled from if script.

> I could have written a script to remove IPV6 link local address but > there should be a basic option for that. > > > Just to emphasise this as I guess it hasn't been clear enough yet... An IPv6 config with no FE80:: address is a broken config. This address should always be on an IPv6 enabled in

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 auto configuration cannot be disabled from if script.

> I could have written a script to remove IPV6 link local address but > there should be a basic option for that. You can set: echo "options ipv6 disable=1" > /etc/modprobe.d/noipv6.conf But more and more apps then log problems or get confused if ipv6 is completely disabled, so keeping the link l

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 auto configuration cannot be disabled from if script.

On 2/17/2013 3:45 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Perhaps you are confused by the link local address (Prefix fe80::) which > is always present on an IPv6 enabled interface. > > HTH > T. Sorry This is what I was aiming for. The link local address.. But it's also the autoconf: #sysctl -a |grep net.ipv6.c

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 auto configuration cannot be disabled from if script.

On 02/17/2013 08:36 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > I want to configure IPV6 on the system and not use some auto ipv6 config. > I have tried to use IPV6_AUTOCONF=no in interface script dose not affect > anything. If you want to turn off IPv6 for all interfaces, make the needed changes to /etc/sysc

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 auto configuration cannot be disabled from if script.

Am 17.02.2013 14:36, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru: > I want to configure IPV6 on the system and not use some auto ipv6 config. > I have tried to use IPV6_AUTOCONF=no in interface script dose not affect > anything. > > ifcfg-eth0: > GATEWAY=192.168.1.254 > IPV6INIT=no > IPV6_AUTOCONF=no > BROADCAST=19

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

> > An update to close: it's a vmware issue: thanks for the closure... VMware diagnosis can be a real pain... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

An update to close: it's a vmware issue: * new centos 5 creations exhibit the same behavior * a few months ago, we migrated from an esx 4.0 cluster to a new esx 4.1 cluster * we've just recently started using a new centos 6 template; the centos 6 system that's working was created before the migrat

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:46:44PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote: > it's interacting badly with centos 6 is a good question. It could be a > bug in vmware tools/the ethernet driver. At least it's narrowed down now... Are you using vmxnet3 drivers? That had a known bug with small udp packets, but it s

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On 8/13/12 12:35 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > Hmm this is especially weird given the 5.8 systems are working - > otherwise I'd have moved the troubleshooting up to vmware or the > switch next... Migrating one of the vms to the same physical host made them start talking to each other, so it's defini

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On 13 August 2012 20:37, Alan Batie wrote: > I found another CentOS 6 system that not only is talking ipv6 properly, > but the test system that can't even talk to the router can talk to it. > That indicates it's probably something wonky with the network itself... > Hmm... I don't have a C6 ipv6

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

I found another CentOS 6 system that not only is talking ipv6 properly, but the test system that can't even talk to the router can talk to it. That indicates it's probably something wonky with the network itself... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

> > Yes, the test system has the default ip6tables, but we always permit icmp: > Hmm this is especially weird given the 5.8 systems are working - otherwise I'd have moved the troubleshooting up to vmware or the switch next... Without access to the machines/switches to traffic dump and check in wi

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On 8/13/12 12:00 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > Are you allowing ICMPv6? I don't just mean echo and echo-reply (the > pings above) but most of the rest of it too? Yes, the test system has the default ip6tables, but we always permit icmp: # Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall # M

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

> > Love gratuitous changes to long standard toolsets... sigh... > It's not a recent change and is far from gratuitous http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00780.html Features such as traffic shaping, policy routing and multiple IPs on an interface (not virtual interfaces) either

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On 8/11/12 2:17 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > With ipv6 in the picture stop using net-tools - they were deprecated a long > time ago and there's multiple edge cases and bugs where they don't work > properly or lack features... learn to use the iproute2 toolset - ip, ss and > tc being the key ones. L

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On 8/11/12, Alan Batie wrote: > We've been running ipv6 for a year or so now, but some of our newer > instances (all on an ESX cluster) are not working. It looks like it's > all of our Centos 6 instances. I'm hoping someone can point me in the > right direction... > [27] # cat ifcfg-eth0 > DEV

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On Aug 11, 2012 2:00 AM, "Alan Batie" wrote: > > On 8/10/12 5:50 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:24:12PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote: > >> IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes > > > > Not sure where you get that from. > > That's not something normally in our configs, I think it was in the > defa

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On 8/10/12 5:50 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:24:12PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote: >> IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes > > Not sure where you get that from. That's not something normally in our configs, I think it was in the default config the centos 6 installer created, and I only stripped

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:24:12PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote: > IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes Not sure where you get that from. Instead try adding IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 to /etc/sysconfig/network FWIW you can see the current routing table with "ip -6 route". -- rgds Stephen

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 routing failure on CentOS5

Nevermind. I copied my ISP's line verbatim, including the erroneous /112 mask. On Friday, March 30, 2012 1:27pm, "Steve Snyder" said: > I can't get IPv6 routing to configure correctly despite everything I've read > saying it should > > This is my network config on a fully-updated CentOS 5.8 s

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 day

Hi, my (german) blog has been running dual-stack for the past few days. Native of course. See http://blog.horrendum.de, if anyone speaks german. :) -- Gruß/Regards, Daniel Heitmann gpg id: B251006E | ascii: http://horrendum.de/gpg.asc | twitter: @dictvm Proprietary attachments instantly go to

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

Dne 11.5.2011 2:15, David Mehler napsal(a): > Hello, > I am afraid a comment in my last message was misinterpreted. I > previously had this configuration, linux and ipv6 tunnel through a > tunnel broker. It was on a Ubuntu 9.10 box that a friend of mine set > up. That box has been retired and repla

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

Hello, I am afraid a comment in my last message was misinterpreted. I previously had this configuration, linux and ipv6 tunnel through a tunnel broker. It was on a Ubuntu 9.10 box that a friend of mine set up. That box has been retired and replaced with CentOS 5.6. I am now trying to get the tunnel

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM, David Mehler wrote: > appreciate hearing from you offlist and please have Ubuntu experience No wonder you can't manage to get it working, you couldn't even post to the right list. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested

Yes, We are using one to HE and one to SIXXS. We don't rely on any of the standard redhat config stuff - we do it all thru our own configs. Been working great. On 05/10/2011 11:17 AM, David Mehler wrote: Hello, Is anyone using an ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel? I've got one through Hurricane Electric

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 - request for info

On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 08:18 +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > I am trying to wrap my head around on this topic. > Was wondering : Just as there is some scope for mapping ipv4 directly > into IPV6 space, Is there a MAC ID or some kind of WWID has also been > taken into consideration

Re: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:24:33AM -0500, Ryan Wagoner wrote: > I will second that I have had no problems using applications with IPv6 > on CentOS 5.5. I currently have apache and samba3x bound to IPv6. I am > also using named and dhcpv6. My only gripe is that dhcpv6 is not the > current ISC daemon

Re: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:58:41PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > My experiences is that IPv6 in CentOS5 works very well, but is not > optimal due to lack of stateful firewalling. However, I'm certain that > is solved in CentOS6/RHEL6. As it so happens, I managed to test out a RedHat 6 build th

Re: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:58 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > My experiences is that IPv6 in CentOS5 works very well, but is not > optimal due to lack of stateful firewalling.  However, I'm certain that > is solved in CentOS6/RHEL6. I will second that I have had no problems using applications with I

Re: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems

On 11/01/11 21:12, Blake Hudson wrote: > > > Original Message > Subject: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems > From: Stephen Harris > To: CentOS mailing list > Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:09:25 PM >> CentOS 5.5, fully patched. >> >> I have a HE tunnel (tunne

Re: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Blake Hudson wrote: > > I have been waiting for RHEL6/CentOS6 because, as I understand it, > CentOS5 does not have a statefull IP6 firewall - e.g. incoming traffic > would have to have a default ACCEPT policy or only specific applications > allowed (based on source

Re: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:12:15PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote: > From: Stephen Harris > > I have a HE tunnel (tunnelbroker.net) IPv6 tunnel. This works pretty > > well and is simple to setup. Everything works fine. > > > > Until I try to set up an ip6tables firewall. > I have been waiting for R

Re: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems

Original Message Subject: [CentOS] IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems From: Stephen Harris To: CentOS mailing list Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:09:25 PM > CentOS 5.5, fully patched. > > I have a HE tunnel (tunnelbroker.net) IPv6 tunnel. This works pretty > well and

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 and DNS...

On 23/04/10 10:19, John Doe wrote: > Hi, > > I keep getting entries like these in my logs: > >network unreachable resolving '0.centos.pool.ntp.org//IN': > 2001:500:40::1#53: 1 Time(s) >network unreachable resolving '0.centos.pool.ntp.org//IN': > 2001:500:e::1#53: 1 Time(s) >ne

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 docs, howtos, descriptions

Vadtec wrote: > My apologies, I read his response incorrectly this morning. As for > GPG, more people need to use it, so you can expect that I will > continue to use my signature as it is. Thunderbird knows how to handle > GPG signatures, sorry your client doesn't. Then use PGP/Mime for signing ma

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 docs, howtos, descriptions

2009/6/12 Tony Asnicar : > I know...google...BUT: > Does someone has good howtos, docs, descriptions, opinions in forums, or > similar things about IPv6 and "related things"? > I just think it would be a very good idea to collect some links about it... > Regards, and thank you in anticipation Just

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 docs, howtos, descriptions

>> I know...google...BUT: >> Does someone has good howtos, docs, descriptions, opinions in forums, or >> similar things about IPv6 and "related things"? >> I just think it would be a very good idea to collect some links about it... >> Regards, and thank you in anticipation > > The wiki ( wiki.cento

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

Vadtec wrote: > Yes, I know about IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES. My goal was to provision an entire > range > automatically. I will handle the issue with a PHP CLI script run from rc.local > to provision the IPs as needed. > > Thanks for all the help. > > Vadtec > vad...@vadtec.net Hey I think I found

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David V wrote: > Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > >> Shouldn't it be something like this? >> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="2001:0470:0103:001A::3/64 >> 2001:0470:0103:001A::4/64 2001:0470:0103:001A::5/64 >> 2001:0470:0103:001A::6/64 2001:0470:0103:001A::7/64 >>

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 docs, howtos, descriptions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Mathis wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Vadtec wrote: > j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: *From:* centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Shouldn't it be something like this? > IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="2001:0470:0103:001A::3/64 > 2001:0470:0103:001A::4/64 2001:0470:0103:001A::5/64 > 2001:0470:0103:001A::6/64 2001:0470:0103:001A::7/64 > 2001:0470:0103:001A::8/64" > > HTH, > Filipe Thanks Felipe and Shawn

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > I really doubt that this will work with this exact syntax, as these > are Bourne shell variable assignments and each of them will overwrite > the previous one... > > Shouldn't it be something like this? > IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="2001:0470:0103:001A::3/64 > 2001:0470:010

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

Hi, On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:07, David V wrote: > Hey I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but even if a range is not > allowed you can still have as many IPV6_SECONDARIES lines as you want, i.e. > IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="2001:0470:0103:001A::3/64" > IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="2001:0470:0103:001A::

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 docs, howtos, descriptions

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Vadtec wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: >> >> >> >> *From:* centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] *On >> Behalf Of

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

Vadtec wrote: > Indeed it doesn't. Guess I'm just out of luck for the time being. Maybe the > support will be added soon enough. > > Thanks for your help. > Hey I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but even if a range is not allowed you can still have as many IPV6_SECONDARIES lines as you w

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 docs, howtos, descriptions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: > > > > *From:* centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] *On > Behalf Of *Tony Asnicar > *Sent:* Friday, June 12, 2009 12:38 PM

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 docs, howtos, descriptions

From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Tony Asnicar Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 12:38 PM To: centos@centos.org; fedora-l...@redhat.com; debian-u...@lists.debian.org; ubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [CentOS] IPv6 d

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 docs, howtos, descriptions

On 06/12/2009 11:37 AM, Tony Asnicar wrote: > I know...google...BUT: > Does someone has good howtos, docs, descriptions, opinions in forums, or > similar things about IPv6 and "related things"? > I just think it would be a very good idea to collect some links about it... > Regards, and thank you in

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Louis Lagendijk wrote: > the file /usr/share/doc/initscripts-8.45.25/sysconfig.txt does NOT > mention the - for ranges either, so I guess you are out of luck. > Louis > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

Hi, On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:49, Vadtec wrote: > So can anyone offer any insight into this? See my reply at the bottom of the > message. I never used IPv6, so I don't know if that applies to IPv6 too or to IPv4 only. In IPv4 it is possible to assign a whole range to a specific machine by addin

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 14:46 -0500, Vadtec wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ok, firstly, I have dropped using the alias notation and am now working solely > on eth0. > > Secondly, yes, I am talking about provisioning more than *one* IP at a time as > being a "range". >

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, firstly, I have dropped using the alias notation and am now working solely on eth0. Secondly, yes, I am talking about provisioning more than *one* IP at a time as being a "range". As for IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES, when I use the following config: /etc

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:49 -0500, Vadtec wrote: > >>> > >>> A few months back, I tried to use the network scripts to provision an > >>> IPv6 range > >>> like can be done with IPv4. I was using CentOS 5.2 at the time and was > >>> informed > >>> that 5.2 was broken in this regard. I have upgraded

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So can anyone offer any insight into this? See my reply at the bottom of the message. Vadtec vad...@vadtec.net Vadtec wrote: > Louis Lagendijk wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:08 -0500, Vadtec wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash:

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Louis Lagendijk wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:08 -0500, Vadtec wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> A few months back, I tried to use the network scripts to provision an IPv6 >> range >> like can be done with IPv4. I wa

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 range provisioning question

On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:08 -0500, Vadtec wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > A few months back, I tried to use the network scripts to provision an IPv6 > range > like can be done with IPv4. I was using CentOS 5.2 at the time and was > informed > that 5.2 was broken in t

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 under Centos?

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 10:25 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote: > > I wonder if anyone is running IPv6 under Centos-5.2? > > > > YES!!! On some systems it is strictly IPv6. IPv4 only on lo loopback. > Running IPv4 + IPv6 hereBut see below... > > Particularly with shorewa

  1   2   >