On 8/26/2016 9:28 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Thanks again. These build systems are not under my project's direct
control, so ???
so what target environments are these build environments currently used
for? thats pretty much what you're going to get.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cr
On 08/25/2016 06:26 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 26/08/16 06:18, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots --
smoketest environments -- match the production environment
>>>
>>>
>>> I think the sane thing to do woul
On 26/08/16 06:18, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots --
>>> smoketest environments -- match the production environment
>>
>>
>> I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB:
>>
>> h
Am 25.08.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Gordon Messmer:
On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots --
smoketest environments -- match the production environment
I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB:
http://www
On 08/25/2016 10:44 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots --
>> smoketest environments -- match the production environment
>
>
> I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB:
On 08/25/2016 09:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
I do realize the sane thing to do is to have the builbots --
smoketest environments -- match the production environment
I think the sane thing to do would be to use buildbots that support LSB:
http://www.ludism.org/~rwhe/LSB/tutorial/tut.html
___
On 08/24/2016 07:53 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 25/08/16 13:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any
>> version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been
>> using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that
On 08/24/2016 08:21 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
<<<>>>
> We'll be moving to a Ubuntu 14 environment, which is spec'd at glibc 2.19
> near as I can determine. So a long story. We will not be building for
> targeted environments.
answer to you problem is in your reply.
install ubuntu 14 to a system a
On 25/08/16 13:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
> To all...yes I meant glibc, not glib. Target environment -- could be any
> version of Linux. This is for Apache OpenOffice. The buildbots we've been
> using are being decommisioned due to EOL. As a developer on that project, I
> need to be able to test and use
On Aug 24, 2016 5:05 PM, "Gordon Messmer" wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm
>> involved with, I need at least glib 2.19.
>
>
> Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, I
think Jo
On 08/24/2016 04:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm
involved with, I need at least glib 2.19.
Do you know why? As in, what features or fixes are required? If not, I
think John's question is pertinent. If you're building a binaries to
d
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:44 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/24/2016 4:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm
>> involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12,
>> and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is
On 8/24/2016 4:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Due to a proposed changeover to build machines for a project I'm
involved with, I need at least glib 2.19. Right now I have glib 2.12,
and even on CentOS7-32 bit, what I see is glib 2.14. Is a higher glib
available anywhere that might work with my current 6
13 matches
Mail list logo
