Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-28 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
> -Original Message- > From: Hersh Parikh [mailto:hershparik...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 7:05 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found > > Sure. Will do so. > > Thanks!! :) > > > > On Friday,

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-28 Thread Hersh Parikh
Sure. Will do so. Thanks!! :)  On Friday, 28 March 2014 4:18 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:05AM -0700, Hersh Parikh wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Thanks for your valuable suggestion. I will keep them in mind. I have > checked whether there is a way to update to Centos to 5.10

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-28 Thread Tru Huynh
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:05AM -0700, Hersh Parikh wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Thanks for your valuable suggestion. I will keep them in mind. I have > checked whether there is a way to update to Centos to 5.10 without > damaging the cluster suite and I was suggested the best way is to > reinstall th

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-28 Thread Hersh Parikh
Hi Guys, Thanks for your valuable suggestion. I will keep them in mind. I have checked whether there is a way to update to Centos to 5.10 without damaging the cluster suite and I was suggested the best way is to reinstall the entire cluster suite. There are few suggestions around this but they

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 27.03.2014 um 14:10 schrieb Steve Clark : > On 03/27/2014 08:51 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> that certainly does happen and individual packages can be excluded (and >> the bugs reported) ... but upgrades still need to happen whenever possible. >> >> We have released 4 different kernels since 6.

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread m . roth
Robert Heller wrote: > At Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:52:51 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its >> running with cluster suite and its a production unit.  Moreover its not >> feasible to upgrade as I have hundreds for apps and da

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread m . roth
You wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. yes I do understand that critical patches needs > to be applied for any OS. But in this case it is not a stand alone machine, > it is a cluster suite and OS was not installed separately. I would have > definitely upgraded the system if this was stand alone b

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Steve Clark
On 03/27/2014 08:51 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/27/2014 07:37 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >> On 03/27/2014 08:26 AM, Robert Heller wrote: >>> At Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:52:51 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list >>> wrote: >>> Hi Alexnder, Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I can

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/27/2014 07:37 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 03/27/2014 08:26 AM, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:52:51 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alexnder, >>> >>> Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its running >>> with cluster suite and its

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Steve Clark
On 03/27/2014 08:26 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:52:51 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> Hi Alexnder, >> >> Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its running >> with cluster suite and its a production unit. Â Moreover its not feasible to >

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:52:51 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi Alexnder, > > Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its running > with cluster suite and its a production unit.  Moreover its not feasible to > upgrade as I have hundreds for apps and data lyi

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Hersh Parikh
Hi Johnny, Thanks for the explanation. yes I do understand that critical patches needs to be applied for any OS. But in this case it is not a stand alone machine, it is a cluster suite and OS was not installed separately. I would have definitely upgraded the system if this was stand alone box.

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/27/2014 04:52 AM, Hersh Parikh wrote: > Hi Alexnder, > > Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its running > with cluster suite and its a production unit. Moreover its not feasible to > upgrade as I have hundreds for apps and data lying on the system. Backing all

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Hersh Parikh
Hi Alexnder, Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its running with cluster suite and its a production unit.  Moreover its not feasible to upgrade as I have hundreds for apps and data lying on the system. Backing all of this not very continent.  Regards Hersh On Thu

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-27 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 27.03.2014 06:22, schrieb Hersh Parikh: > Hi Frank, > > Thanks for quick response. Does it mean that I cant have glib 2.7 on centos > 5.4? Right, you can't. If you install a different glibc than the one provided by CentOS 5, then your system will be completely broken. The glibc is a very imp

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-26 Thread Hersh Parikh
Hi Frank, Thanks for quick response. Does it mean that I cant have glib 2.7 on centos 5.4?  Regards Hersh On Thursday, 27 March 2014 10:27 AM, Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Hersh Parikh wrote: > Examining glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64.rpm: 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86

Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found

2014-03-26 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Hersh Parikh wrote: > Examining glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64.rpm: 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 I think "mnb" means that you have a Mandriva rpm there; nothing to do with Centos. The current version of glibc on Centos 5 is glibc-2.5-118.el5_10.2 -- MELVILL