Re: [CentOS] GFS/GFS2 on CentOS

2010-08-31 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:36:42PM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote: > > > > > > Nope, Red Hat backports the necessary bits from the newer kernels into > > their 2.6.18 "stable" release, so you should be all set. > > > > Ray > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > >

Re: [CentOS] GFS/GFS2 on CentOS

2010-08-31 Thread Boris Epstein
> > > Nope, Red Hat backports the necessary bits from the newer kernels into > their 2.6.18 "stable" release, so you should be all set. > > Ray > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This is int

Re: [CentOS] GFS/GFS2 on CentOS

2010-08-31 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:12:24PM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could > >> you share you

Re: [CentOS] GFS/GFS2 on CentOS

2010-08-31 Thread Boris Epstein
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could >> you share you general impression on it? Was it realiable? Fast? Any >> issues or concern

Re: [CentOS] GFS/GFS2 on CentOS

2010-08-10 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hi all, > > If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could > you share you general impression on it? Was it realiable? Fast? Any > issues or concerns? I've only run GFS2 on RHEL5. It's been quite reliable, but