> The more I experience it, the more it seems clear that this issue only
> happens with GMail / Google Apps. So I really think that this is
> either a GMail or a Firefox issue.
Just to close this: since the official update to Firefox 3.6, the
problem disappeared.
__
> Usualy I am not the first who hit a bug, but ok, I can fill the bug
> report to CentOS bugzilla. Or do you think it would be better to report
> it to Nvidia support?
>
File CentOS bug after searching to see if it exists. Then it will be decided
whether or not it is sent upstream.
Am I correct a
Usualy I am not the first who hit a bug, but ok, I can fill the bug
report to CentOS bugzilla. Or do you think it would be better to report
it to Nvidia support?
Bye, Andrej
chaohac...@non-serviam.com wrote:
>> I couldn't find anything about this on the web. Firefox downgrade didn't
>> help, but
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>
> I removed the nvidia driver from elrepo and installed this one from
> Nvidia website, but it did not solve my problem.
>
> The more I experience it, the more it seems clear that this issue only
> happens with GMail / Google Apps. So I rea
> help, but finaly I realized that I upgraded nvidia driver too - problem
> disapeared right after downgrade to nvidia driver
> NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.22-pkg2.run. There are alse other versions
I removed the nvidia driver from elrepo and installed this one from
Nvidia website, but it did not solv
> I couldn't find anything about this on the web. Firefox downgrade didn't
> help, but finaly I realized that I upgraded nvidia driver too - problem
> disapeared right after downgrade to nvidia driver
> NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.22-pkg2.run.
>
Do you think this worth filing a bug report against?
Hi Mathieu, I had the same problem with Firefox since I upgraded to
CentOS 5.5.
I noticed very slow (almost unusable) Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g
(Database Control, Grid Control and Application Server Control) and MS
SharePoint pages, high X.org cpu usage and noisy fans activity.
I couldn't
On 5/27/2010 2:47 PM, MHR wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
>>> "difficult to impossible"? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
>>> the oth
On 5/27/2010 2:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
>>> "difficult to impossible"? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
>>> the other unices. It's not M$, and it's not Apple... so is being neither
>>> making it hard?
>>
>> For
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
>> "difficult to impossible"? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
>> the other unices. It's not M$, and it's not App
> On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
Ah, no, it's not. Brian had it right: nvidia does keep a lot
proprietary, and does *not* pay a lot of attention to writing their
own drivers for Linux.
>>>
>>> Exactly - and it is linux that intentionally makes it difficult to
On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Ah, no, it's not. Brian had it right: nvidia does keep a lot
>>> proprietary, and does *not* pay a lot of attention to writing their
>>> own drivers for Linux.
>>
>> Exactly - and it is linux that intentionally makes it difficult to
>> imposs
> On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Les wrote:
>>> On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> Thanks for the hint!
> I tried the workaround but unfortunately I still have the problem...
I cured my nvidia driver problems (which re-arose every kernel update
> > nvidia is not fond of the Linux world (compared to ATI).
>
> A more realistic way to say that is that linux is
> intentionally incompatible with a lot of other software.
AIUI, nvidia gives (to the linux world) less information about how to
exploit nvidia capabilities than does ATI, and th
On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les wrote:
>> On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
> you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
> so, you may have been affected by this bu
Les wrote:
> On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>>>
I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
so, you may have been affected by this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>
>>
>>> I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
>>> you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
>> so, you may
>>> have been affected by this bug:
>>>
>>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
>>>
>>> There
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mathieu Baudier
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:33 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox slower on GMail since update to
> CentOS 5.5
> I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
> you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If so, you may
> have been affected by this bug:
>
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
>
> There is a workaround which solved the problem for me.
Thanks for the hint
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since I upgraded from CentOS x86_64 5.4 to 5.5, I noticed that Firefox
> has become significantly slower on GMail (or Google Apps Mail).
>
> The page becomes slow to scroll as soon as there are more than a few
> mails in a conver
20 matches
Mail list logo
