>> > On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
>> >> Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
>> >> improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to
>> >> look at Thunderbird 2.0, th
Brian Mathis wrote:
On 6/26/07, Jean Figarella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
> On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
>> Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
>> improved here and wait
On 6/26/07, Jean Figarella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
> On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
>> Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
>> improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I ha
Jim Perrin wrote:
On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to
look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new
> I have found this to be a frustrating 'option' Even when I
> shutdown FF2
cleanly, when I start it (even after rebooting
> the system), it trys to
resume my sessions...
Tools -> Options -> Main -> Startup. Under "When Firefox starts",
change from "Show my windows and tabs from last time" t
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
improved here and wait for 3.0?
Sorry to jump in, but where is that you saw Red Hat saying "there is
nothing _improved_ in FF2"?!
When I was googling for any rpms, I found a number of threads on the
subject. It COULD
> Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
> improved here and wait for 3.0?
Sorry to jump in, but where is that you saw Red Hat saying "there is
nothing _improved_ in FF2"?! I suppose RHEL5 doesn't have FF2 because
"it's too new", but here is what I terribly miss while using FF1.5:
-- saving th
Jim Perrin wrote:
On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to
look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new
On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to
look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)?
Actually, Fire
9 matches
Mail list logo
