On 9/26/2013 10:53 PM, g wrote:
>> its an xfs specific mount option. see the man pages for mount (8),
>> >under*Mount options for xfs*...
>> >
>> >
> yes, as stated above;
>
>i understand_mount_options_. i do not find it in "man fstab".
from man fstab,
The fourth field, (fs_mntops)
On 09/27/2013 12:53 AM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 09/26/2013 11:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 9/26/2013 9:30 PM, g wrote:
>>> yes, i understand mount options. i do not find it listed in
>^
>>> 'man fstab' for the clone that i am currently using.
> ^
>
On 09/26/2013 11:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/26/2013 9:30 PM, g wrote:
>> yes, i understand mount options. i do not find it listed in
^
>> 'man fstab' for the clone that i am currently using.
^
>>
>> looks like i will have to wait until i get
On 9/26/2013 9:30 PM, g wrote:
> yes, i understand mount options. i do not find it listed in
> 'man fstab' for the clone that i am currently using.
>
> looks like i will have to wait until i get centos iso downloaded
> and installed so i can move out of os i am currently using.
its an xfs specifi
On 09/26/2013 10:44 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-09-27, g wrote:
>>
>> would you please explain on using 'inode64' in 'fstab'.
>
> It's a mount option, so goes in the fourth column with the other mount
> options (comma-separated).
yes, i understand mount options. i do not find it listed in
On 2013-09-27, g wrote:
>
> would you please explain on using 'inode64' in 'fstab'.
It's a mount option, so goes in the fourth column with the other mount
options (comma-separated).
--keith
--
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
___
CentOS mailing l
On 09/26/2013 06:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/26/2013 2:27 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>> so that I know
>> how urgent it is for me to migrate to inode64.
>
> you realize, 'migrate' is trivial?
>
> mount -o remount,inode64 /dev/whatever
>
> and replace 'defaults' with 'inode64' on the line in /
On 9/26/2013 6:54 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> Yes. I also realize that I have NFS clients and am exporting a
> subdirectory, so I want to reorganize my share to export the top-level
> directory instead. Since this involves a disruptive change to my
> clients I need to schedule such work, ideally at
On 2013-09-26, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/26/2013 2:27 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>> so that I know
>> how urgent it is for me to migrate to inode64.
>
> you realize, 'migrate' is trivial?
Yes. I also realize that I have NFS clients and am exporting a
subdirectory, so I want to reorganize my share
On 9/26/2013 2:27 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> so that I know
> how urgent it is for me to migrate to inode64.
you realize, 'migrate' is trivial?
mount -o remount,inode64 /dev/whatever
and replace 'defaults' with 'inode64' on the line in /etc/fstab so it
does it next time too.
thats it.
--
jo
On 09/26/2013 04:27 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
<>
> So following up on that, I have a question: I have a largish XFS
> filesystem which is currently not mounted inode64. I would like to know
> how close I am to filling up the inodes in the first 1TB, so that I know
> how urgent it is for me to mig
On 9/26/2013 2:27 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> So following up on that, I have a question: I have a largish XFS
> filesystem which is currently not mounted inode64. I would like to know
> how close I am to filling up the inodes in the first 1TB, so that I know
> how urgent it is for me to migrate to
On 2013-09-20, John R Pierce wrote:
> for large xfs file systems, be sure to mount with option inode64.
There are a bunch of FAQ entries at the XFS site about this issue.
Here's one of them:
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_is_the_inode64_mount_option_for.3F
The other issues about using
Very useful information John. Thank you.
(Your email slipped through the cracks and I just saw it by accident. I'm
happy I didn't loose it.)
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/20/2013 2:27 PM, Peter Wood wrote:
> > XFS worked. Thanks a lot.
>
> for large xfs file syste
On 9/20/2013 2:27 PM, Peter Wood wrote:
> XFS worked. Thanks a lot.
for large xfs file systems, be sure to mount with option inode64.
there's one caveat on XFS in Linux, when used as a nfs export... if you
JUST export your file system root, then you're fine, but if you like to
have multiple sep
On 20.09.2013 21:58, Peter Wood wrote:
> mkfs.ext4 fails to create 38TB file system on CentOS 6.4 64bit with
> this
> error:
>
> mkfs.ext4: Size of device /dev/vg02/vtapes too big to be expressed in
> 32
> bits
> using a blocksize of 4096.
>
EXT4 filesystems are limited (on RHEL) to 16
XFS worked. Thanks a lot.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 20.09.2013 21:58, Peter Wood wrote:
> > mkfs.ext4 fails to create 38TB file system on CentOS 6.4 64bit with
> > this
> > error:
> >
> > mkfs.ext4: Size of device /dev/vg02/vtapes too big to be expressed in
> > 32
> > bi
17 matches
Mail list logo
