On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:47 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:
>>Anyone know someone who can front at least 2 years working capital to get
>>started and productive?
>
> >From a pure business standpoint, it would be near impossible to pull off. No
> >one is going to pony up $2,000,000 to start CentOS u
"$200/month" = $200/year
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>Anyone know someone who can front at least 2 years working capital to get
>started and productive?
>From a pure business standpoint, it would be near impossible to pull off. No
>one is going to pony up $2,000,000 to start CentOS up as a for-profit company.
>Aside from the small point that you w
on 3/27/2011 5:36 AM Ian Murray spake the following:
>
>
>>
>> What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
>> (Or only work developing CentOS?)
>>
>> I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
>>
>> No one that we know of is willing to pay a full time salary
>
> What the CentOS project would be interested in (from a corporate
> provider) would be to hire people and allow them to do CentOS related
> things.
>
> We are not interested in being paid in addition to our current work, but
> making taking care of CentOS our only work.
>
> There are many t
Dne 27.3.2011 17:33, Johnny Hughes napsal(a):
> What the CentOS project would be interested in (from a corporate
> provider) would be to hire people and allow them to do CentOS related
> things.
>
> We are not interested in being paid in addition to our current work, but
> making taking care of Cen
Fair enough. I have no complaints with the current volunteers. I was
mainly just curious. Thanks for the reply.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
> >There have been a number of recent conversations on the developer list and
> this list about CentOS. My initial thought was
On 03/27/2011 07:36 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>>
>> What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
>> (Or only work developing CentOS?)
>>
>> I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
>>
>> No one that we know of is willing to pay a full time salary for 1 or 2
At Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:36:02 +0100 (BST) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
> > (Or only work developing CentOS?)
> >
> > I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
> >
> > No one that we know of is wi
>
> What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
> (Or only work developing CentOS?)
>
> I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
>
> No one that we know of is willing to pay a full time salary for 1 or 2
> or 3 people to develop CentOS. If they would p
On 03/26/2011 07:46 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>> There have been a number of recent conversations on the developer list and
>> this list about CentOS. My initial thought was why not have CentOS and SL
>> merge. Since they have different goals I can understand the reason not to.
>> So my next q
>There have been a number of recent conversations on the developer list and
>this list about CentOS. My initial thought was why not have CentOS and SL
>merge. Since they have different goals I can understand the reason not to.
>So my next question is, has no corporate entity offered to spons
Well, I ask because there are people supporting SL to the degree that they
have full time
people working on it, yet they don't actually aim for 100% binary
compatibility, just "good enough".
I have used CentOS for a while and wasn't really aware of SL until
recently. With all the projects that
get
Am 26.03.2011 um 22:16 schrieb Gary Scarborough:
> There have been a number of recent conversations on the developer
> list and this list about CentOS. My initial thought was why not
> have CentOS and SL merge. Since they have different goals I can
> understand the reason not to. So my n
14 matches
Mail list logo
