Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-23 Thread James Pearson
isd...@gmail.com wrote: >>My advice to anyone who needs a good, solid browser is to use the stock >>one (Firefox ESR) or get the latest Firefox binary from ftp.mozilla.org >>if they really want to be bleeding edge. > > Doesn't work or even build on CentOS5 anymore. The latest version that > s

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-21 Thread Carl T. Miller
Nux! wrote: > On 20.09.2013 18:36, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >> What about Midori browser? > > Newer Midori does not build on CentOS due to, you guessed it, too old > deps versions. > > My advice to anyone who needs a good, solid browser is to use the stock > one (Firefox ESR) or get the latest Fire

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-21 Thread isdtor
> My advice to anyone who needs a good, solid browser is to use the stock > one (Firefox ESR) or get the latest Firefox binary from ftp.mozilla.org > if they really want to be bleeding edge. Doesn't work or even build on CentOS5 anymore. The latest version that stillbuilt was 22. __

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-20 Thread Nux!
On 20.09.2013 18:36, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > What about Midori browser? > > http://midori-browser.org/ > > it's also a webkit based browser. Does anyone have experience with > Midori? Newer Midori does not build on CentOS due to, you guessed it, too old deps versions. My advice to anyone w

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-20 Thread Robert Arkiletian
What about Midori browser? http://midori-browser.org/ it's also a webkit based browser. Does anyone have experience with Midori? On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > I'm skeptical about a long term solution involving a script that > copies binaries from Fedora distributio

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-18 Thread Robert Arkiletian
I'm skeptical about a long term solution involving a script that copies binaries from Fedora distribution. I would prefer a solution which incorporates the newer devtools from Tru. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > If you keep on canceling the auth dialog it will eventually load

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-18 Thread Kwan Lowe
If you keep on canceling the auth dialog it will eventually load from Google's cache, minus the images. The main download is a script that does the package copy. I'll have a chance to try it in about an hour. Johnny, thanks for your efforts in getting this to work. 2013/9/18 Darr247 : > On 2013-

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-18 Thread Darr247
On 2013-09-18 6:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > http://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedora-linux/ That page requests credentials, even from google's cache. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailma

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-18 Thread Scott Robbins
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:41:43AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/17/2013 11:27 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > Latest chromium-el6 at > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/ > > is > > chromium-28.0.1500.95-213514.x86_64.rpm > > > > but latest chromium stable is 29.0.15

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

2013-09-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 09/17/2013 11:27 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > Latest chromium-el6 at > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/ > is > chromium-28.0.1500.95-213514.x86_64.rpm > > but latest chromium stable is 29.0.1547.xx > > wondering if there are any problems building version 29? Yes, ther