Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> If no smartphones gets broken and/or replaced, they could reach number
> of PC users (50%) in one year. Realistically it will take them 2-3 years
> to reach those numbers.
>
> BUT, I have 2 phones (one of them is Android), 1 desktop PC and 1
> laptop. And 95-97% of in
At Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:20:55 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> ---Executing: recode
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > Vreme: 11/16/2011 07:55 AM, Christopher Chan pise:
> >
> >> On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> >>
> >>> Vreme: 11/15/2011 04:14 PM
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 11/16/2011 07:55 AM, Christopher Chan piše:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 11/15/2011 04:14 PM, Rob Kampen piše:
run a virtualbox with windoze XP for a realtor app that only works on IE
(yeah, go figur
On 16 Nov 2011, at 15:19, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> hmm... "Strom over a teacup"
My reply concerned the huge amount of drivel being posted to this
list. The topic is supposedly CentOS - not "stressed sysadmins
sounding off". Simples really.
Ben
Sent from my iPhone
__
Vreme: 11/16/2011 04:18 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan piše:
> Centos has much larger installed base than "upstream provider".
Internet facing systems (market share of web servers) and Install base
are not the same thing. MANY RHEL installations never ever see "the
light of day", so Not true.
Al
Greetings,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Benjamin Donnachie
wrote:
> On 16 November 2011 14:02, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
>> So not only does the overall SNR leave, well, everything to be desired
>> but not we are tolerating this type of language? Good job - you've
>> made an already useless
On 16 November 2011 14:02, John R. Dennison wrote:
> So not only does the overall SNR leave, well, everything to be desired
> but not we are tolerating this type of language? Good job - you've
> made an already useless list that much worse. You rule.
As much as I detest people who do this
On 11/16/2011 6:36 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>
>>> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the
>>> internet? I'd guess it is already over 50%.
>> Not over 50%, but 5,5%, according to this source:
>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/
>
> I may have exaggerate
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 05:39:28AM -0800, Drew wrote:
> > Agreed! The cramped screen space (I run dual vid cards in sli with 4
> > monitors with development apps spread all over them!), sluggish response
> > (open what I have running on my work station and any laptop goes into
> > crawl mode), hea
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:54:31AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Well, yes, I can think of a hell of a lot of things that *beat*
> ->working<- at home in your living room, which suggests that you're doing
> well over 40 hours/week. Been there, done that, actually have a t-shirt.
> Do it again
Drew wrote:
>> Agreed! The cramped screen space (I run dual vid cards in sli with 4
>> monitors with development apps spread all over them!), sluggish response
>> (open what I have running on my work station and any laptop goes into
> And the funny thing, from my perspective at least, is that I'm
> Agreed! The cramped screen space (I run dual vid cards in sli with 4
> monitors with development apps spread all over them!), sluggish response
> (open what I have running on my work station and any laptop goes into
> crawl mode), heat (if you really run it in your lap as the name infers)
> and t
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 07:44 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>>> I find it very hard to believe that 90% of Chinese are using desktops.
>>> What about all those girls tweeting on the bus to school?
>>> There must be billions of them.
>>>
>>>
>> Farmers/peasants have p
Vreme: 11/16/2011 12:36 PM, Timothy Murphy piše:
> Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>
>>> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the
>>> internet? I'd guess it is already over 50%.
>>
>> Not over 50%, but 5,5%, according to this source:
>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/
>
>
> I may have e
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:44:26AM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I think your image of China is rather out-of-date.
I have a novel suggestion. As this has absolutely NOTHING to do with
CentOS (like usual) how about taking it to private e-mail?
Christopher Chan wrote:
>> I find it very hard to believe that 90% of Chinese are using desktops.
>> What about all those girls tweeting on the bus to school?
>> There must be billions of them.
>>
>>
> Farmers/peasants have phones?
>
> All those girls tweeting?
>
> Aren't you confusing Japan
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the
>> internet? I'd guess it is already over 50%.
>
> Not over 50%, but 5,5%, according to this source:
> http://www.netmarketshare.com/
I may have exaggerated the figure,
but I don't believe it is as low as t
Vreme: 11/16/2011 07:55 AM, Christopher Chan piše:
> On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 11/15/2011 04:14 PM, Rob Kampen piše:
>>
>>> run a virtualbox with windoze XP for a realtor app that only works on IE
>>> (yeah, go figure, we are in 2011 and they force
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:38 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Worrk is worrk (germaniK accent intended... :) ). Home is Home.
>>
> Laptops are very much entertainment and educational devices. Things
> useful at home even if you aren't interested in technology for its own
> sake or using
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 11/15/2011 04:14 PM, Rob Kampen piše:
>
>> run a virtualbox with windoze XP for a realtor app that only works on IE
>> (yeah, go figure, we are in 2011 and they force everyone to use IE)
>>
> Install PlayOnLinux (
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
>
>>> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the internet?
>>> I'd guess it is already over 50%.
>>>
>>>
>> Mobile devices still have *under* 6% of the internet browser market.
>>
>
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 09:52, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the
> internet? I'd guess it is already over 50%.
Not over 50%, but 5,5%, according to this source:
http://www.netmarketshare.com/
--
Yves Bellefeuille
"La Esperanta Civito ne ri
Alan McKay wrote on 11/14/2011 09:56 PM:
>> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility
>> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither
>> is perfect.
> That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1
> (and so long ago at that
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:00 PM, wrote:
>
>>> or don't you remember them deleting 1984?
>>
>> That wasn't censorship, it was correcting an error with appropriate
>> refunds. I don't think they are particularly evil or controlling,
>> just very tempting.
>
> Yes, they were, They deleted it WITH N
>
> I was wondering if it would be safe to just stay with the 'standard'
> repo for centos and wait for 6.1 that way or do you suggest adding the
> CR repo as a necessary event?
Depends on if you feel that security updates are important to your
infrastructure.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> We have different goals ... and for what SL rebuilds they want to be
> 100% binary compatible ... but they do not want their ISOs to necessary
> be compatible (if, for example, they need openais and it is not upstream).
But they also inclu
Johnny Hughes wrote
--
We have a CR repository that has a bunch of 6.1 (and updates newer than
6.1 as well) in there. It is not like there are no updates to 6.0
released. The ISOs for 6.1 are not released, but the RPMs are.
---
I was wondering if it
On 11/14/2011 08:56 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility
>> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither
>> is perfect.
>
> That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1
> (and so long ago at
On 11/15/2011 06:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Currently, CentOS build system should be in much better shape and we
>> will see how it will do for coming 6.2 point release (already in beta).
>
> Thanks very much for that.
> I found your account most interesting an
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, wrote:
In the UK, being dedicated to one's family means, among other things,
finding ways to avoid buying most electronic devices.
>>>
>>> It just got worse here with the Kindle fire release. Aside from being
>>> a nice toy it wil
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, wrote:
>> Why don't you call your Congresscritter and Senator, and tell them you
>> personally want to donate the money to replace everything we have that
>> doesn't have IPMI, and pay for the time install and cable i
On 11/15/2011 06:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 09:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 15.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
>>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
>> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
>> but it is not true nor will it never get
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>
>>> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility
>>> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither
>>> is perfect.
>>
>> That's interesting. So h
On Nov 14, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility
>> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither
>> is perfect.
>
> That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1
> (and so long
On 15 Nov 2011, at 20:10, "John R. Dennison" wrote:
> Until various repeat offenders on this list are moderated or otherwise
> dealt with this nonsense is going to keep on happening.
The signal to noise ratio has always been pretty low on this list but
lately it has become so unbearable I'm serio
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:39:12AM -0800, david wrote:
> Hasn't this discussion drifted from the initial topic?
Until various repeat offenders on this list are moderated or otherwise
dealt with this nonsense is going to keep on happening. I wonder if
their employers are aware of the time spent on
Hasn't this discussion drifted from the initial topic?
I'm sure the price of tablets, of phone service, etc., are
interesting to some, but PULEEZZE, look at the topic and ask "is the
message contributing to the understanding of changes at RedHat
confounding CentOS"
David
_
On Nov 15, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, wrote:
>
>> or don't you remember them deleting 1984?
>
> That wasn't censorship, it was correcting an error with appropriate
> refunds. I don't think they are particularly evil or controlling,
> just very
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
>
>>> And $200 for a
>>> book reader?
>>
>> That's a fantastic price for a color tablet - they are almost
>> certainly losing money on it.
>>
>
> Dear Les, Look at Per capita monthly income of other countries: less
> that USD 100.
Ave
On 15 Nov 2011, at 18:33, John R Pierce wrote:
> thats not amazon's target demographic, anyways. whats your point?
Here we go again. What does any of this have to do with CentOS, the
topic of this list? Does every thread have to degenerate into
bickering?
If only my iPhone supported kill lis
On 11/15/11 10:30 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> And do you think anybody would buy that when they have a family to support?
thats not amazon's target demographic, anyways. whats your point?
by that argument, noone should be selling cars. stereos. TV sets. etc
etc etc.
--
john r p
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, wrote:
>> And $200 for a
>> book reader?
>
> That's a fantastic price for a color tablet - they are almost
> certainly losing money on it.
>
Dear Les, Look at Per capita monthly income of other
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, wrote:
>
>>> Hell, no, I don't run fedora. I've got three or four users, and my
>>> manager on one of his systems, who do. I *LOATHE* it, with all the
>>> grief upgrades have given me.
>>
>> And, correspondingly, you probably don't really run any 'desktop'
>> app
Make centos a new distro and forget about rh
2011/11/14 Alan McKay
> These seems to me to be the first message in the series and provides a
> really good summary of the changes at Red Hat which seem to be making
> life a lot more difficult for CentOS.
>
> Just figured I'd pull it out of that thr
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, wrote:
>>> In the UK, being dedicated to one's family means, among other things,
>>> finding ways to avoid buying most electronic devices.
>>
>> It just got worse here with the Kindle fire release. Aside from being
>> a nice toy it will have an account attached
Vreme: 11/15/2011 07:04 PM, John R Pierce piše:
> On 11/15/11 6:52 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the internet?
>> I'd guess it is already over 50%.
>
> to state the obvious, 50% of people are below average.
http://www.internetworldstats.com/s
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, wrote:
> Why don't you call your Congresscritter and Senator, and tell them you
> personally want to donate
> the money to replace everything we have that doesn't have IPMI, and pay
> for the time install and cable it all up? That would be *great*...
On 11/15/11 7:41 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What about all those girls tweeting on the bus to school?
twitter is for twits.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
CentOS mailin
On 11/15/11 6:52 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the internet?
> I'd guess it is already over 50%.
to state the obvious, 50% of people are below average.
mcdonalds sells more hamburgers than (pick-your-favorite-chophouse)
sells steaks. theref
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:17 AM, John Hodrien
> wrote:
>>
>> I'd say:
>>
>> In the UK, being dedicated to one's family means, among other things,
>> finding ways to avoid buying most electronic devices.
>
> It just got worse here with the Kindle fire release. Aside from be
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 05:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>> On 11/15/2011 05:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphy
> wrote:
>>
> 'Desktop' is in contrast to 'se
Vreme: 11/15/2011 05:58 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn piše:
> With an upgrade path between major versions Red Hat will become responsible
> for that and I'm not sure they are willing to bear that burden for all the
> possible various installations out there.
I do not think they will, but 500MB boot pa
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:57 AM, wrote:
>>
I don't agree with that. Some people do want to keep running what they
know, and if the budget's tight
>>>
>>> Then you probably don't run Fedora - the 'desktop' oriented
>>> distribution, or care much for the non-bac
Vreme: 11/15/2011 05:43 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn piše:
> Supermicro boards come with IPMI on-board these days so you can do all that
> work that you previously did standing next to the server from the confines
> of your cozy home. This is even more useful when you server is sitting in a
> rack in
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
> wrote:
> Laptops are very much entertainment and educational devices. Things
> useful at home even if you aren't interested in technology for its own
> sake or using it f
Vreme: 11/15/2011 06:06 PM, Reindl Harald piše:
> from where is the dumb assumption that
There is no need for that. Mailing lists are for discussing, forums are
for insulting and flame wars :D
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
Google is the Mother, Google
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:17 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>
>> In the US, being dedicated to one's family means, among other things,
>> that you will buy them electronic devices.
>
> My wife doesn't even have an iPod yet, does that make me a bad person? ;)
Only if she likes music and you don't sing
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Obviously if you don't have IPMI on some systems or cannot use it for other
> reasons then that's tragic but inevitable. All I'm saying is that for new
> system you should strongly consider it. Back in the days you actually
> needed to buy an add
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
In the US, being dedicated to one's family means, among other things,
that you will buy them electronic devices.
My wife doesn't even have an iPod yet, does that make me a bad person? ;)
I'd say:
In the UK, being dedicated to one's family means, amon
On 11/15/2011 05:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/15/2011 05:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphy
wrote:
>
> Incidentally, I don't really understand
> what is meant by the t
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:57 AM, wrote:
>
>>> I don't agree with that. Some people do want to keep running what they
>>> know, and if the budget's tight
>>
>> Then you probably don't run Fedora - the 'desktop' oriented
>> distribution, or care much for the non-backwards compatible changes
>>
Am 15.11.2011 15:52, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
>>
>> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
>> but it is not true nor will it never get true!
>>
>> why in the world should i use a laptop in my offi
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Chris Geldenhuis
wrote:
> Steve Thompson wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
I have not understood / udder- stood (It should have spelled
"understood", but it is a deliberate hack on that word ;) )
On 11/15/2011 05:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/15/2011 04:31 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
The "preupgrade" is what I've been using the last year, and why I'm now
building boxes here with 500M
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, wrote:
>> I don't agree with that. Some people do want to keep running what they
>> know, and if the budget's tight
>
> Then you probably don't run Fedora - the 'desktop' oriented
> distribution, or care much for the non-backwards compa
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 05:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphy
>>> wrote:
Incidentally, I don't really understand
what is meant by the term "desktop" nowadays.
I always think of it as a co
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, wrote:
>>
>> 'Desktop' is in contrast to 'server'. On a server, you only reboot to
>> load a new kernel and you never use the console display, rarely change
>
> Oh, I dunno - it's not infrequently that I have to plug in a
> monitor-on-a-stick
You only need
On 11/15/2011 05:23 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphy
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Incidentally, I don't really understand
>>> what is meant by the term "desktop" nowadays.
>>> I always think of it as a contrast to laptop.
>>
>> 'Desktop' is i
Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
>>> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
>>> but it is not true nor will it never get true!
>>>
>
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 04:31 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us pie:
>>> The "preupgrade" is what I've been using the last year, and why I'm now
>>> building boxes here with 500M instead of 100M root partitions, figuring
>>> that it
On 11/15/2011 02:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> Fedora is basically an incubator for new technologies and as such not
>> really an attractive system to install for end-users. If you deal with
>> servers you probably go with CentOS, SL, Debian, etc. and if you want
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
>
> I don't.
>
>>
>> Don't you think you are in a very small minority,
>> like 1% of the world?
>
> I live in India.
>
> hmm... I am one of the 1/6th of the population in th
On 11/15/2011 04:31 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
>> The "preupgrade" is what I've been using the last year, and why I'm now
>> building boxes here with 500M instead of 100M root partitions, figuring
>> that it's what's coming for CentOS, eventu
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Timothy Murphy
> wrote:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Don't you think you are in a very small minority,
>> like 1% of the world?
>
> I live in India.
>
> hmm... I am one of the 1/6th of the population in the world and "I
> don't own a
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphy
> wrote:
>>
>> Incidentally, I don't really understand
>> what is meant by the term "desktop" nowadays.
>> I always think of it as a contrast to laptop.
>
> 'Desktop' is in contrast to 'server'. On a server, you only reboot to
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
I don't.
>
> Don't you think you are in a very small minority,
> like 1% of the world?
I live in India.
hmm... I am one of the 1/6th of the p
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> Incidentally, I don't really understand
> what is meant by the term "desktop" nowadays.
> I always think of it as a contrast to laptop.
'Desktop' is in contrast to 'server'. On a server, you only reboot to
load a new kernel and you never
Benjamin Franz wrote:
>> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the internet?
>> I'd guess it is already over 50%.
>>
>
> Mobile devices still have *under* 6% of the internet browser market.
>
> See http://www.netmarketshare.com/
I find it very hard to believe that 90% of Chin
On 11/15/2011 9:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
> but it is not true nor will it never get true!
>
> why in the world should i use a laptop
Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
> The "preupgrade" is what I've been using the last year, and why I'm now
> building boxes here with 500M instead of 100M root partitions, figuring
> that it's what's coming for CentOS, eventually.
+1
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
Vreme: 11/15/2011 04:14 PM, Rob Kampen piše:
> run a virtualbox with windoze XP for a realtor app that only works on IE
> (yeah, go figure, we are in 2011 and they force everyone to use IE)
Install PlayOnLinux (Wine installer) and install IE6 inside it. Maybe
your App will work without virtual Wi
Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:52 PM, Timothy Murphy piše:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
>>
>> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
>> but it is not true nor will it never get true!
>>
>> why in the world should i use a laptop in my off
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
>>
>> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
>> but it is not true nor will it never get true!
>>
>> why in the world should i use a laptop in my office i
Vreme: 11/15/2011 01:56 PM, Timothy Murphy piše:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Currently, CentOS build system should be in much better shape and we
>> will see how it will do for coming 6.2 point release (already in beta).
>
> Thanks very much for that.
> I found your account most interesting a
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
this is what some braindead developers seems to think
but it is not true nor will it never get true!
why in the world should i use a laptop in my office if
i can have a Core i7 Quad c
On 11/15/2011 06:52 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the internet?
> I'd guess it is already over 50%.
>
Mobile devices still have *under* 6% of the internet browser market.
See http://www.netmarketshare.com/
--
Benjamin Franz
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
>>
>> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
>> but it is not true nor will it never get true!
>>
>> why in the world should i use a laptop in my office if
>> i can have a Core
Reindl Harald wrote:
>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
>
> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
> but it is not true nor will it never get true!
>
> why in the world should i use a laptop in my office if
> i can have a Core i7 Quad combined with much mo
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 01:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> I saw statistics - I don't remember where - saying that
>> CentOS had 30% of the Linux market, which I found very surprising,
Wow!
>> though also satsifying (to me). SL had a tiny share.
On 11/15/2011 09:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
> this is what some braindead developers seems to think
> but it is not true nor will it never get true!
>
> why in the world should i use a laptop
Am 15.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use?
this is what some braindead developers seems to think
but it is not true nor will it never get true!
why in the world should i use a laptop in my office if
i can have a Core i7 Quad combined w
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Fedora is basically an incubator for new technologies and as such not
> really an attractive system to install for end-users. If you deal with
> servers you probably go with CentOS, SL, Debian, etc. and if you want a
> desktop you probably use Ubuntu.
I don't really
On 11/15/2011 01:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Currently, CentOS build system should be in much better shape and we
>> will see how it will do for coming 6.2 point release (already in beta).
>
> Thanks very much for that.
> I found your account most interesting and
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Currently, CentOS build system should be in much better shape and we
> will see how it will do for coming 6.2 point release (already in beta).
Thanks very much for that.
I found your account most interesting and informative.
I guess one question that I've never seen
Vreme: 11/15/2011 03:56 AM, Alan McKay piše:
>> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility
>> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither
>> is perfect.
>
> That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1
> (and so long ago a
> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility
> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither
> is perfect.
That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1
(and so long ago at that)?
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen a
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Basically from what I gather, while Red Hat cannot restrict access to
> sources, they can restrict access to binaries. And since CentOS has a
> goal of binary compatibility with upstream, they are essentially left
> trying to hit an unknown ta
97 matches
Mail list logo
