Il giorno ven, 18/01/2013 alle 11.33 +0100, Timo Schoeler ha scritto:
> Ignoring it, because it doesn't hurt?
Ignoring the load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00 because is only a errata
display of load average and the real average is "0,03, 0,03, 0,00"?
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato da
On 01/18/2013 11:28 AM, thus Dario Lesca spake:
> Il giorno gio, 17/01/2013 alle 13.09 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn ha
> scritto:
>> Looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883905
>>
>> Regards, Dennis
>
> Ok, Then solution, after read this from bug 883905:
>
>> Brian Foster 2013-0
Il giorno gio, 17/01/2013 alle 13.09 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn ha
scritto:
> Looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883905
>
> Regards,
> Dennis
Ok, Then solution, after read this from bug 883905:
> Brian Foster 2013-01-08 10:28:08 EST
> The current consensus for this bug i
On 01/17/2013 12:17 PM, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Hi, on my c6.3 server (guest of a vmware host) I have a strange load
> average value:
>
> w command:
>> [root@s-doc ~]# w
>> 11:19:23 up 41 days, 23:15, 1 user, load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00
>> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU
4 matches
Mail list logo