Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread Garrick Staples
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:49:49PM -0500, Mark A. Lewis alleged: > So, what is a "valid" 64bit CPU? I have a DEC Alpha in the basement that > is most certainly 64 bit, but can't install the i386 or x86_64 version > on it. How about Sparc or HP-UX boxes? Are they valid 64 bit CPUs? Those are comple

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread John R Pierce
Mark A. Lewis wrote: So, what is a "valid" 64bit CPU? I have a DEC Alpha in the basement that is most certainly 64 bit, but can't install the i386 or x86_64 version on it. How about Sparc or HP-UX boxes? Are they valid 64 bit CPUs? I suspect he meant specifically x86_64... sure, there's lot

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread MHR
On Feb 8, 2008 1:49 PM, Mark A. Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, what is a "valid" 64bit CPU? I have a DEC Alpha in the basement that > is most certainly 64 bit, but can't install the i386 or x86_64 version > on it. How about Sparc or HP-UX boxes? Are they valid 64 bit CPUs? > Grrr - we we

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread John R Pierce
Ralph Angenendt wrote: I don't think so. i586 (ViA C5/6, AMD K-III) won't even run an i686 kernel... i586 is the original Pentium and Pentium/MMX (60Mhz to about 233Mhz) as well as the clones you mention above, while i686 is the Pentium Pro, P2, P3, P4, and Core, as well as various clones.

RE: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread Mark A. Lewis
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garrick Staples Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 4:32 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586 On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:40:55PM -0800, MHR alleged: > On Feb 8, 2008 9:02 AM,

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread Garrick Staples
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:40:55PM -0800, MHR alleged: > On Feb 8, 2008 9:02 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 05:47:58PM +0100, Matias Surdi wrote: > > > Is possible to install Centos 5 on a 586 CPU? (cpu_type = 5) > > > > > > > No. I think there was so

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread MHR
On Feb 8, 2008 1:19 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think so. i586 (ViA C5/6, AMD K-III) won't even run an i686 > kernel - and definitely no 64bit kernel. > Correct - my mistake (see? I do that...). mhr ___ CentOS mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread Ralph Angenendt
MHR wrote: > I had 586 CPUs on two different machines at work way back when 5.0 > came out, and the x86_64 installation ran just fine on both. I don't think so. i586 (ViA C5/6, AMD K-III) won't even run an i686 kernel - and definitely no 64bit kernel. Ralph pgp8rNJ0s3abR.pgp Description: PGP si

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread MHR
On Feb 8, 2008 9:02 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 05:47:58PM +0100, Matias Surdi wrote: > > Is possible to install Centos 5 on a 586 CPU? (cpu_type = 5) > > > > No. I think there was some interest in making this happen at some > point: > > http://wiki.c

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586

2008-02-08 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 05:47:58PM +0100, Matias Surdi wrote: > Is possible to install Centos 5 on a 586 CPU? (cpu_type = 5) > No. I think there was some interest in making this happen at some point: http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CentOS5PentiumSupport However I'm not sure that it will end up