Re: [CentOS] CentOS QA

2015-06-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/18/2015 08:26 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 07:51:28AM +0530, Sudhi wrote: >> Thanks for the replies. >> I understood that a major part of testing being done by Redhat. But after >> repackaging the sources how doest CentOS make sure >> the integrity of the product. Is

Re: [CentOS] CentOS QA

2015-06-18 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 07:51:28AM +0530, Sudhi wrote: > Thanks for the replies. > I understood that a major part of testing being done by Redhat. But after > repackaging the sources how doest CentOS make sure > the integrity of the product. Is it being done by a dedicated team or by > community ?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS QA

2015-06-17 Thread Sudhi
Thanks for the replies. I understood that a major part of testing being done by Redhat. But after repackaging the sources how doest CentOS make sure the integrity of the product. Is it being done by a dedicated team or by community ? On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > O

Re: [CentOS] CentOS QA

2015-06-12 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:49:42AM +0530, Sudhi wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the forum to ask this query. I was wondering how > the CentOS making sure that it work with different architectures, machine > models etc. Is there any team to do all these testing ? This isn't for CentOS, but for RHE

Re: [CentOS] CentOS QA

2015-06-11 Thread g
On 06/11/2015 11:19 PM, Sudhi wrote: > Hello everyone > > I'm not sure if this is the forum to ask this query. I was wondering > how the CentOS making sure that it work with different architectures, > machine models etc. Is there any team to do all these testing ? yes. not sure if you are fishi

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-qa] Mailserver move

2012-05-27 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 05/27/2012 12:15 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Hi subscribers, > > the sponsor of the machine our mailserver runs on will be physically > moving the machine at around May 27th 04:00 UTC. This move will take > until around May 27th 07:00 UTC (or shorter). And we are back -- Karanbir Singh +44

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-QA Mailing List

2011-05-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/13/2011 10:52 AM, Steven Crothers wrote: > Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It > would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the > development is completely locked down and not open source. > We have made the QA tracker open for viewing here:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-QA Mailing List

2011-05-13 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It > would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the > development is completely locked down and not open source. For (x = 0; x < REALLY_LARGE_NUMBER; x++) { system("echo \"IS IT DO

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-qa] Updated livecd building tool

2009-08-19 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Patrice Guay wrote: > I updated the livecd-tools package from version 013 to 014. This update > introduces new interesting features like : > - support for Xen kernel > - built-in md5sum into the resulting LiveCD ISO > - a new API > > See https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd