Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7/8s EOL : infrastructure impacts (please read)

2024-04-02 Thread Aleksandar Ivanisevic
Just in case anyone is interested, Google has no plans of removing old images, whether they will switch them to vault remains to be seen, I have tried to advise them but who knows what seeped through from the 1st level support. This is what I got from their support: Hello Aleksandar, Thank y

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7/8s EOL : infrastructure impacts (please read)

2024-04-01 Thread The GOAT
Hi, In thread... https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2024-March/1078098.html ...the mention of the AMIs got me thinking about these images. https://www.centos.org/download/aws-images/ Will the CentOS Linux 7 AMI images continue to be available after June 30 2024, so people can use the la

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7/8s EOL : infrastructure impacts (please read)

2024-03-18 Thread Aleksandar Ivanisevic
> On 18. Mar 2024, at 08:53, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > On 18/03/2024 08:43, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: >> Hi, >> do we know what happens with the images at major hyperscalers and when? I’m >> interested specifically about GCP. Who is in charge of centos-cloud project >> in GCP? You or Googl

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7/8s EOL : infrastructure impacts (please read)

2024-03-18 Thread Fabian Arrotin
On 18/03/2024 08:43, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: Hi, do we know what happens with the images at major hyperscalers and when? I’m interested specifically about GCP. Who is in charge of centos-cloud project in GCP? You or Google? $ gcloud compute images describe centos-stream-8-v20240312 --pro

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7/8s EOL : infrastructure impacts (please read)

2024-03-18 Thread Aleksandar Ivanisevic
Hi, do we know what happens with the images at major hyperscalers and when? I’m interested specifically about GCP. Who is in charge of centos-cloud project in GCP? You or Google? $ gcloud compute images describe centos-stream-8-v20240312 --project centos-cloud architecture: X86_64 archiveSizeB

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 guest on virt-manager

2022-06-03 Thread Fred
I have no experience with virt-manager, but I'm gonna guess that CDRoms don't do secure boot? If so, and you turned it off in that VM it might boot. Fred On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 2:43 PM Jerry Geis wrote: > Hello - > > I am running Centos 7 virt-manager which I have used for years. > Trying to in

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 polkit update

2022-01-26 Thread Ranbir
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 10:42 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > That has been pushed to the master server and is syncing to the > mirror > network.  It will be announce shortly. Thank you for the update. :) I also noticed (obviously _after_ I emailed the list) my local mirror hadn't done a sync yet to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 polkit update

2022-01-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 1/26/22 10:35, Ranbir wrote: Hi All, I was looking for an update to polkit in CentOS 7 to fix CVE-2021-4034, but I don't see one yet. I'm assuming it's coming soon-ish. Is there any word on roughly when that will be? Here's the RHEL 7 advisory: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:027

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 on Dell after update and reboot running at HZ not Mhz

2021-12-23 Thread Pete Biggs
On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 22:02 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > I have a Dell R320 > > > What on earth is making this machine run sooo slow ??? > > Its OFF by a factor of 10 - it should be 1800 mhz > I have lots of R440 and one of them went like this. I tried lots of things to get it back up to full spe

Re: [CentOS] centos 7 mbr to gpt without loosing data

2021-11-04 Thread Ralf Prengel
Zitat von Gordon Messmer : On 11/4/21 09:23, Ralf Prengel wrote: has anyone a working tutoring how to migrate a centos 7 system from mbr to gpt without loosing data. Do you mean the boot volume, or some other disk? I think your ability to do this, in any scenario, will depend heavily on

Re: [CentOS] centos 7 mbr to gpt without loosing data

2021-11-04 Thread Ralf Prengel
Hallo, my testsystem for training this case is a default centos7 minimal installation. Later I ve to fix a server with 10 disks and disk number 3 must be resized from 1,8 TB to 2,3 TB. If it is possible it would be ok to configure a mixed setting. Von meinem iPad gesendet > Am 04.11.2021 um 19:4

Re: [CentOS] centos 7 mbr to gpt without loosing data

2021-11-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 11/4/21 09:23, Ralf Prengel wrote: has anyone a working tutoring how to migrate a centos 7 system from mbr to gpt without loosing data. Do you mean the boot volume, or some other disk? I think your ability to do this, in any scenario, will depend heavily on your partition alignment.  Whe

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 getssl script

2021-05-31 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article , Jerry Geis wrote: > I am using the getssl script to add a certificate to my server. > The script is automatically adding a SANS www.myserver.com when I do not > have a www.myserver.com - just simply the myserver.com > > How can I tell getssl to "not add that SANS" entry ? getssl cre

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 on a new Dell Precision

2021-05-15 Thread Phil Perry
On 15/05/2021 16:14, Tony Schreiner wrote: On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:21 PM Tony Schreiner wrote: I am trying to install CentOS 7 on a Dell Precision 3640 and am having some driver problems. I had to use kmod-e1000e from ElReo enable networking on the: 00:1f.6 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 on a new Dell Precision

2021-05-15 Thread Tony Schreiner
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:21 PM Tony Schreiner wrote: > I am trying to install CentOS 7 on a Dell Precision 3640 and am > having some driver problems. > > I had to use kmod-e1000e from ElReo enable networking on the: > 00:1f.6 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation Ethernet > Connection (1

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Lamar Owen wrote: On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: [what can be done] I am guessing someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some packages to try and make it fit in single density. This is probably the solution at this point for the 'Fu

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Japheth Cleaver
On 3/18/2021 6:36 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not allowed on premises. While all

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 10:56, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > [what can be done] I am guessing > > someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some > packages to try and make it fit in single density. > > > This is probably the solution at

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 3/14/21 8:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking > system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing > front ends I've ever seen. Could anyone familiar with it please file a > bug on my behalf? Particul

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: [what can be done] I am guessing someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some packages to try and make it fit in single density. This is probably the solution at this point for the 'Full' DVD. In the interim, older machines s

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 09:36, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to > > boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. > There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not > allowed on pr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not allowed on premises. While all DVD-ROM drives are supposed to read DL me

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Valeri Galtsev
> On Mar 18, 2021, at 7:30 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > > At Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:24:51 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42:40PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Christopher Wensink
All of this could be avoided with a simple external disk reader like this: https://www.amazon.com/Portable-External-Optical-Touch-Screen-Recorder/dp/B084WS3DHR/ref=sr_1_8?dchild=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIzNfR3PW57wIVkb3ACh0kqwzLEAAYASAAEgJQvPD_BwE&hvadid=177198149510&hvdev=c&hvlocphy=9019301&hvnetw=g&hv

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-18 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:24:51 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42:40PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS > wrote: > > > > I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have > > never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-17 Thread John R. Dennison
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42:40PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > > I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have > never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that the DVD iso was > released without any release notes advising it was oversized T

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-17 Thread Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 20:41 +0100, André Verwijs via CentOS wrote: > > I blueray disk (25GB)?? works great :) André, I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that the DVD iso was released without any release notes a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-17 Thread Michael Hennebry
Supergrub will boot some .iso files. In the past, I have directly booted a partition I made from a fedora .iso file. Another option *might* be making another .iso file. Mount the file. Copy its filesystem to a directory. Remove some stuff you can live without. Make another .iso file using directi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-17 Thread André Verwijs via CentOS
I blueray disk (25GB)?? works great :) Op 17-03-2021 om 03:03 schreef H: On March 16, 2021 11:16:21 AM EDT, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: We need to ask the developers to make a re-spin that's about 5MB smaller. And before someone s

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-16 Thread H
On March 16, 2021 11:16:21 AM EDT, Michael Hennebry wrote: >On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > >> We need to ask the developers to make a re-spin that's about 5MB >> smaller. And before someone suggests it, the 2010-vintage server I'm >> trying to install CentOS on do

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-16 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: We need to ask the developers to make a re-spin that's about 5MB smaller. And before someone suggests it, the 2010-vintage server I'm trying to install CentOS on does not support booting from a thumb drive, so that option is not avail

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-16 Thread Lamar Owen
On 3/16/21 9:37 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: Sure, no problem.  I had a similar problem with a different version of CentOS, 8.3, which is too large to fit on a dual-layer DVD. I should have done the math before posting, sorry.  Here's the math: lowen@d10-lo-m6700:~$ dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/sr0 INQUIRY:  

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-16 Thread Lamar Owen
On 3/15/21 5:04 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 16:26, Lamar Owen wrote: Well, what's odd is that the actual upstream RHEL 7.9 DVD WILL fit on a single-layer DVD. Just burned one. Well I am batting 0 for 1000 today. I am clearly not a good resource at the moment :). Tha

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-16 Thread Rob Kampen
On 16/03/21 9:25 am, Lamar Owen wrote: On 3/15/21 8:51 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Exactly that. Upstream Fedora and RHEL went to require dual density around Fedora 18, RHEL-7 because the amount of data was too much. Well, what's odd is that the actual upstream RHEL 7.9 DVD WILL fit on a s

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-15 Thread John R. Dennison
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 05:04:41PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Well I am batting 0 for 1000 today. I am clearly not a good resource at the > moment :). Thanks Lamar for checking the real source. It's ok, smooge... It's First Monday, you've got 4 more of 'em to go :)

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 16:26, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 3/15/21 8:51 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Exactly that. Upstream Fedora and RHEL went to require dual density > around > > Fedora 18, RHEL-7 because the amount of data was too much. > Well, what's odd is that the actual upstream RHEL 7.9

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-15 Thread Lamar Owen
On 3/15/21 8:51 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Exactly that. Upstream Fedora and RHEL went to require dual density around Fedora 18, RHEL-7 because the amount of data was too much. Well, what's odd is that the actual upstream RHEL 7.9 DVD WILL fit on a single-layer DVD.  Just burned one.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 08:19, Robert Heller wrote: > At Sun, 14 Mar 2021 21:49:40 -0500 "Robert G. \(Doc\) Savage" < > dsav...@peaknet.net>, CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:31 -0400, John Plemons wrote: > > > Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-15 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 14 Mar 2021 21:49:40 -0500 "Robert G. \(Doc\) Savage" , CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:31 -0400, John Plemons wrote: > > Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is double the > > capacity. > > John, > > Wrong answer. The server's optical drive d

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-15 Thread Michel van Deventer
Hi, you can also burn it to a DL (dual layer) DVD (like the Centos 8 image). regards, Michel On 2021-03-15 02:13, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing f

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-15 Thread Simon Matter
> On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:31 -0400, John Plemons wrote: >> Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is double the >> capacity. > > John, > > Wrong answer. The server's optical drive doesn't support double-layer > disks. The CentOS developers made a mistake on their DVD iso, and they >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:31 -0400, John Plemons wrote: > Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is double the > capacity. John, Wrong answer. The server's optical drive doesn't support double-layer disks. The CentOS developers made a mistake on their DVD iso, and they need to fix

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread Valeri Galtsev
> On Mar 14, 2021, at 8:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > >> On Mar 14, 2021, at 8:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS >> wrote: >> >> I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking >> system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing >> front ends

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread Valeri Galtsev
> On Mar 14, 2021, at 8:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS > wrote: > > I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking > system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing > front ends I've ever seen. Could anyone familiar with it please file a > bug on

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread John Plemons
Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is double the capacity. john On 3/14/2021 9:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing front ends I'v

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, selinux and pop_port_t

2021-02-12 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 12.02.21 um 04:27 schrieb H: I am muddling my way through learning selinux when installing a webapp with httpd as the webserver running CentOS 7. The app allows the user to send/receive mail etc but it seems that I have yet to allow access to imap port 993. So far it seems this is configure

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, as a 6in4 server

2020-12-02 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 12/2/20 10:02 AM, Walter H. wrote: On 02.12.2020 09:16, Roberto Ragusa wrote: but you have 3 different networks, yes, my own network at home, the network of the tunnel, and public the network where the VPS is part of; shouldn't you just configure routing instead of using proxy_ndp? wi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, as a 6in4 server

2020-12-02 Thread Walter H.
On 02.12.2020 09:16, Roberto Ragusa wrote: On 12/1/20 8:39 PM, Walter H. wrote: I have a VPS at a hoster where I got 3 /64 ipv6 prefixes/subnets, that are routed; one for the VPS itself  - let us call this  srvprefix one for the tunnel, only ::1 (server side) and ::2 (home side) are used - l

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, as a 6in4 server

2020-12-02 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 12/1/20 8:39 PM, Walter H. wrote: I have a VPS at a hoster where I got 3 /64 ipv6 prefixes/subnets, that are routed; one for the VPS itself  - let us call this  srvprefix one for the tunnel, only ::1 (server side) and ::2 (home side) are used - let us call this tunnelprefix and one for my

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 + PHP7.2 - variables_order not working

2020-10-27 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:54 PM + Gary Stainburn wrote: I've just moved my site onto a new box and I'm having a real problem  with $_REQUEST.  The variables_order  and request_order values are not being respected. I glanced at the documentation for that directive and there seems

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-06 Thread Lamar Owen
On 8/5/20 5:40 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: Is there some way we could get the initrd rebuild to be more verbose, so that it doesn't appear to hang? It would be nice to get feedback that something is happening, especially on an older, slower system that takes a long time for this step. While t

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-05 Thread Kai Bojens via CentOS
Am 05.08.20 um 13:44 schrieb Leon Fauster via CentOS: > Take a look into "top", > if something like gz or xz is in place occupying your CPU then the > initrd gets build ... just wait :-) 'journalctl -f' shows the state of the build process. ___ CentOS ma

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-05 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 05.08.20 um 02:13 schrieb david: At 05:01 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: Am 05.08.20 um 01:27 schrieb david: At 04:18 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: Am 05.08.20 um 01:09 schrieb david: At 01:54 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:44:05 -0700 david wrote: > After all the updates, the system

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-05 Thread Phil Perry
On 05/08/2020 10:40, Kenneth Porter wrote: Is there some way we could get the initrd rebuild to be more verbose, so that it doesn't appear to hang? It would be nice to get feedback that something is happening, especially on an older, slower system that takes a long time for this step. Not

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-05 Thread Kenneth Porter
On 8/4/2020 11:20 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: Running transaction Installing : kernel-3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64 1/1 at which point the process appeared to hang. No further output happened for five minutes. I opened a different terminal and entered "shutdown -r now". The result is an unbootabl

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-04 Thread david
At 05:01 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: Am 05.08.20 um 01:27 schrieb david: At 04:18 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: Am 05.08.20 um 01:09 schrieb david: At 01:54 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:44:05 -0700 david wrote: > After all the updates, the system was NOT bootable. How long did you w

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-04 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 05.08.20 um 01:27 schrieb david: At 04:18 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: Am 05.08.20 um 01:09 schrieb david: At 01:54 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:44:05 -0700 david wrote: > After all the updates, the system was NOT bootable. How long did you wait for it to boot, and what did i

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-04 Thread david
At 04:18 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: Am 05.08.20 um 01:09 schrieb david: At 01:54 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:44:05 -0700 david wrote: > After all the updates, the system was NOT bootable. How long did you wait for it to boot, and what did it do when it failed to boot? What

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-04 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 05.08.20 um 01:09 schrieb david: At 01:54 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:44:05 -0700 david wrote: > After all the updates, the system was NOT bootable. How long did you wait for it to boot, and what did it do when it failed to boot?  What text messages showed up on the cons

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-04 Thread david
At 01:54 PM 8/4/2020, you wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:44:05 -0700 david wrote: > After all the updates, the system was NOT bootable. How long did you wait for it to boot, and what did it do when it failed to boot? What text messages showed up on the console? Any reported errors when you r

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:44:05 -0700 david wrote: > After all the updates, the system was NOT bootable. How long did you wait for it to boot, and what did it do when it failed to boot? What text messages showed up on the console? Any reported errors when you ran the update or when you rebooted

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-04 Thread david
Your system was most likely rebuilding the initrd, and you interrupted it leaving you with a broken initrd. Try booting off a rescue disk and chroot into the install, and run: dracut -f -v to regenerate all the initrds. Also, you don't need to reinstall the kernel but just do a 'yum update'

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 shim fix failed

2020-08-04 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:54:50AM -0700, david wrote: > Yum got up to the point: > > Running transaction > Installing : kernel-3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64 1/1 > > at which point the process appeared to hang. No further output happened for > five minutes. I opened a different terminal and entered

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 rsyslog and ELK

2020-07-18 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 7/10/20 3:51 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 16:44 -0400, Jason Edgecombe wrote: I don't use ELK at the moment, but is this helpful? % journalctl -f --output=json The above command prints the continuous output of the systemd journal in json format. Thanks. The problem is getti

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 rsyslog and ELK

2020-07-10 Thread Earl Ramirez
> > What do people do to get their syslog messages on CentOS 7 into a > remote ELK stack. I've tried lots of things involving rsyslog, > filebeat, redis, logstash and so on in lots of different > configurations > but nothing really works. I did this a couple times, I will share the configs in co

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 rsyslog and ELK

2020-07-10 Thread Pete Biggs
On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 16:44 -0400, Jason Edgecombe wrote: > I don't use ELK at the moment, but is this helpful? > > % journalctl -f --output=json > > The above command prints the continuous output of the systemd journal in > json format. > Thanks. The problem is getting that into logstash. But

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 rsyslog and ELK

2020-07-10 Thread Pete Biggs
> > What do people do to get their syslog messages on CentOS 7 into a > > remote ELK stack. I've tried lots of things involving rsyslog, > > filebeat, redis, logstash and so on in lots of different configurations > > but nothing really works. > > > > I can get rsyslog to talk directly to logstas

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 rsyslog and ELK

2020-07-10 Thread Jason Edgecombe
I don't use ELK at the moment, but is this helpful? % journalctl -f --output=json The above command prints the continuous output of the systemd journal in json format. Jason --- Jason Edgecombe | Linux Administrator UNC Ch

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 rsyslog and ELK

2020-07-10 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 16:33, Pete Biggs wrote: > > I asked a similar question about a year ago and didn't get any answers. > So I thought I'd try again. > Honestly, as much as I have heard of people using Elastic Kibana.. they are usually using it for things already in JSON. WHen I looked in the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 system running out of available memory, then unusable, network interfaces probably involved

2020-06-30 Thread wwp
Hello John, On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:54:58 -0700 John Pierce wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:47 PM wwp wrote: > > > > > Nothing jumps to my eyes looking at /var/log/messages but this, many > > occurrences: > > kernel: nf_conntrack: falling back to vmalloc. > > > > nf_conntrack is only

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 system running out of available memory, then unusable, network interfaces probably involved

2020-06-29 Thread John Pierce
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:47 PM wwp wrote: > > Nothing jumps to my eyes looking at /var/log/messages but this, many > occurrences: > kernel: nf_conntrack: falling back to vmalloc. > nf_conntrack is only involved if you are doing some form of NAT routing on this system and/or fairly complex ip

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - xfs shrink & expand

2020-05-16 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
"telinit" was what I needed, thanks again! -Frank On 5/13/2020 12:05 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. wrote: I'll try that...I was using instructions I found on the internet for single-user/maintenance mode.   From the grub screen you enter 'e' and modify the linux16 line...etc. Okay, I'll try tha

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - xfs shrink & expand

2020-05-13 Thread Mark Milhollan
Correct, XFS filesystems cannot be shrunk (reduced) dynamically, like ext2/3/4 can, only grown. You need to create another, smaller filesystem (XFS too usually) then copy the existing content which can be done with tools like xfsdump & xfsrestore (iff both are XFS), rsync, pax (spax), or tar,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - xfs shrink & expand

2020-05-13 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Hi, XFS filesystems cannot be shrunk. If you need to shrink an XFS file system, then you have to backup the data, delete the entire filesystem, resize the volume in LVM, then create a new filesystem and restore the data from backup. Ref: https://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_Is_there_a_way_to_make

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - xfs shrink & expand

2020-05-13 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
I'll try that...I was using instructions I found on the internet for single-user/maintenance mode.   From the grub screen you enter 'e' and modify the linux16 line...etc. Okay, I'll try that next. Thanks Simon! On 5/13/2020 7:28 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: Hi, Yeah, I tried that but

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - xfs shrink & expand

2020-05-13 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
Hi, > Yeah, I tried that but ran into a problem.  It came up fine in > single-user/maintenance mode.   The mount command shows all of the > mounted file systems, but after I 'chroot /sysroot', the mount failed > (with some problem with mtab, sorry don't have the exact error > message).  So I could

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - xfs shrink & expand

2020-05-13 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Yeah, I tried that but ran into a problem.  It came up fine in single-user/maintenance mode.   The mount command shows all of the mounted file systems, but after I 'chroot /sysroot', the mount failed (with some problem with mtab, sorry don't have the exact error message).  So I couldn't mount m

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - xfs shrink & expand

2020-05-12 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
Hi, > I'm having some difficulty finding a method to shrink my /home to expand > my /.  They both correspond to LVMs.  It is my understanding that one > cannot shrink a xfs filesystem.  One must back it up (xfsdump), remove > (lvremove) redefine it and then restore it back (xfsrestore). > > Okay,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - xfs shrink & expand

2020-05-12 Thread Jack Morgan
Frank, On 5/12/20 5:06 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. wrote: > I'm having some difficulty finding a method to shrink my /home to > expand my /.  They both correspond to LVMs.  It is my understanding > that one cannot shrink a xfs filesystem.  One must back it up > (xfsdump), remove (lvremove) redefine

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 disable the the hot corner

2020-05-12 Thread Pete Biggs
On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 16:52 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > I have loaded the gnome-shell-extension-no-hot-corner-3.28.1-11.el7.noarch > and also the gnome-tweaks. > > When I run gnome-tweaks no where in there do I find the disable hot corner. > > where is that ? It should be under "Extensions" in gn

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7: cups-pdf Postprocessing prevented by selinux :(

2020-04-15 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 04:55:13 +0200 hw wrote: > Hi, > > how can I make it so that printing to a cups PDF printer can > successfully run the postprocessing script I specified > in /etc/cups/cups-pdf.conf? I haven't run into this one myself so I'm not sure this will work (but simple enough to try)

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : broken dependencies

2020-04-09 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 09:34, Simon Matter wrote: > >> > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 08:40, Simon Matter via CentOS >> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> >> >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a >> >> >> production >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : broken dependencies

2020-04-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 09:34, Simon Matter wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 08:40, Simon Matter via CentOS > > wrote: > > > >> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > >> >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a > >> >> production > >> >> server

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : broken dependencies

2020-04-09 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> Hi, > > I got an alert from Yum-Cron this morning: > > Failed to check for updates with the following error message: > Failed to build transaction: > sclo-php72-php-pecl-imagick-3.4.4-1.el7.x86_64 > requires libMagickCore.so.5()(64bit) > sclo-php72-php-pecl-imagick-3.4.4-1.el7.x86_64 requires > l

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : broken dependencies

2020-04-09 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 08:40, Simon Matter via CentOS > wrote: > >> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a >> >> production >> >> server, yes or no? >> > >> > Not on production. Only for testing. >> >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : broken dependencies

2020-04-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 08:40, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a > >> production > >> server, yes or no? > > > > Not on production. Only for testing. > > I'm not sur

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : broken dependencies

2020-04-09 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 02:40:12PM +0200, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a > >> production > >> server, yes or no? > > > > Not on production. Only for testing. > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : broken dependencies

2020-04-09 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a >> production >> server, yes or no? > > Not on production. Only for testing. I'm not sure. Running production environments without CR enabled means you're running wi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : broken dependencies

2020-04-09 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a production > server, yes or no? Not on production. Only for testing. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and USB 3.1 -additional

2020-04-08 Thread Jerry Geis
lspci | grep USB shows 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 200 Series/Z370 Chipset Family USB 3.0 xHCI Controller 03:00.0 USB controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM2142 USB 3.1 Host Controller b3:00.0 USB controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM2142 USB 3.1 Host Controller Getting many erro

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-02 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 02.04.2020 um 16:10 schrieb Jerry Geis: This is unfortunate. https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/TroubleshootMacvtapHostFail To the "normal" user - BRIDGE means guest is on the same network and has access to the host. Bummer. Jerry You were not telling us that you were using Macvtap. Alexander

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-02 Thread Leroy Tennison
Wow, thanks for sharing, I'd have never dreamed it. From: CentOS on behalf of Jerry Geis Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 9:10 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host This is unfort

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-02 Thread Jerry Geis
This is unfortunate. https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/TroubleshootMacvtapHostFail To the "normal" user - BRIDGE means guest is on the same network and has access to the host. Bummer. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-01 Thread Jerry Geis
OK I rebooted. I changed the NIC from Bridge to Passthrough, hit apply, then changed it to bridge and hit apply, then booted the VM. My firewall looks better but still not working. iptables -L FORWARD -v -n | egrep '(policy|virbr1)' Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) 0 0 ACCE

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-01 Thread Jerry Geis
>Sorry, have to correct myself. Had to much to do today on OpenShift. >There is no Docker involved in what we discuss. The firewall rules for >the host bridge devices get created by libvirtd. Thanks I was using iptables and not converted to firewalld. I am doing so now. Will I need to delete the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-01 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 01.04.2020 um 22:07 schrieb Alexander Dalloz: So looks like my IPTables is not correct. What commands do you run for that ? Simply firewalld. Docker acts by itself. Sorry, have to correct myself. Had to much to do today on OpenShift. There is no Docker involved in what we discuss. The fir

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-01 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 01.04.2020 um 21:56 schrieb Jerry Geis: Thanks for the info. brctl show virbr0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000.525400fc34af yes virbr0-nic brctl show virbr1 bridge name bridge id STP enabled inter

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-01 Thread Jerry Geis
Thanks for the info. brctl show virbr0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000.525400fc34af yes virbr0-nic brctl show virbr1 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr1 8000.5254009c3902

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 host with guests as bridge cannot access host

2020-04-01 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 01.04.2020 um 14:53 schrieb Jerry Geis: I have CentOS 7 host. Two guests on bridge network setup by GUI and virt-manager. 1 CentOS 8 guest 1 Win 10 guest Both cannot access the host. They can other machines on the network. Guests can access the internet just not the host. I used virt-manager

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 : SELinux trouble with Fail2ban

2020-02-28 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 2/26/20 9:52 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 26/02/2020 à 11:51, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit : SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from read access on the file disable. *  Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests   * If you believe that python2.7 should be allowed read access on the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >