Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 gcc is a bit old

2015-06-30 Thread Jonathan Billings
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 16:08, James A. Peltier wrote: > When you're going to maintain software for long periods of time the Modules > environment can come in really handy. See http://modules.sf.net You can even use modules with the SCL packages, it is a simple translation. Hopefully in the fut

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 gcc is a bit old

2015-06-29 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Matt Garman wrote: Take a look at Devtoolset, I think this will give you what you want: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ Thanks much. It looks like what I want. Also, I think I'll look at the Modules environment in case a convient solution

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 gcc is a bit old

2015-06-29 Thread James A. Peltier
- Original Message - | Take a look at Devtoolset, I think this will give you what you want: | https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ | | | | On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Michael Hennebry | wrote: | > gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11) is a bit o

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 gcc is a bit old

2015-06-29 Thread John R Pierce
On 6/29/2015 11:56 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: Does a standard CentOS 7 repository have a newer version? Does a CentOS 7-compatible repository have a newer version? el 7 comes with gcc 4.8.3 -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentO

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 gcc is a bit old

2015-06-29 Thread Matt Garman
Take a look at Devtoolset, I think this will give you what you want: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11) is a bit old. > There have been major changes since the