On 07/20/2011 01:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>>
>>> Initial thought is a routing issue particularly with multiple NICs.
>>>
>>> What does 'ip r s' reveal?
>>>
>> That was it! ip r s showed that I had the local facing NIC (eth1) as the
>> gateway, which caused all outgoing packets to be routed to
>>
>> Initial thought is a routing issue particularly with multiple NICs.
>>
>> What does 'ip r s' reveal?
>>
> That was it! ip r s showed that I had the local facing NIC (eth1) as the
> gateway, which caused all outgoing packets to be routed to the local network
> DUH!.
>
Yup been there before
On 07/19/2011 12:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> > I built a CentOS 6 machine to host several CentOS 6 guest servers. As all
> guests will be Internet facing I set up the host with two bridged NICs and
> assigned an Internet facing IP address to br0 and a local IP address to br1.
> >
> > Each
On 07/19/2011 07:52 PM, Khusro Jaleel wrote:
> A bit of a long shot but does turning on STP on the br* interfaces help?
> I vaguely remember I had to do the following on one of my machines that
> uses bonding + bridges:
>
> # brctl stp br0 on
>
> I have put this in the machines' /etc/rc.local s
On 19/07/2011 08:14, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> > I built a CentOS 6 machine to host several CentOS 6 guest servers.
> As all guests will be Internet facing I set up the host with two
> bridged NICs and assigned an Internet facing IP address to br0 and a
> local IP address to br1.
> >
> > Each g
> I built a CentOS 6 machine to host several CentOS 6 guest servers. As all
guests will be Internet facing I set up the host with two bridged NICs and
assigned an Internet facing IP address to br0 and a local IP address to br1.
>
> Each guest was installed using br0 and br1 with virtio drivers. On
6 matches
Mail list logo
