Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-28 Thread Gionatan Danti
Il 2021-01-28 19:17 James Pearson ha scritto: I don't know of another way of testing if this build fixes the issue ? According to Qualys blog, sudoedit -s '\' `perl -e 'print "A" x 65536'` should core-dump on vulnerable versions. I just tried on stock 6.10 and it core-dumps, indeed. Upgradin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-28 Thread James Pearson
Barry Brimer: > > I just installed this on a previously fully updated CentOS Linux 6 (x86_64) > VM. > The package installed fine, the sudo functionality still works but according > to > the test described in the qualys advisory of running "sudoedit -s /” > (without quotes) this system is still vu

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-28 Thread Barry Brimer
I just installed this on a previously fully updated CentOS Linux 6 (x86_64) VM. The package installed fine, the sudo functionality still works but according to the test described in the qualys advisory of running "sudoedit -s /” (without quotes) this system is still vulnerable. My CentOS Linux

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-28 Thread James Pearson
Maxim Shpakov: > > You can use oracle linux 6 , it is still supported (till March 2021) Looks like Oracle's el6 sudo update is now available: https://yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/latest/x86_64/getPackage/sudo-1.8.6p3-29.0.2.el6_10.3.x86_64.rpm https://yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-27 Thread James Pearson
Christian Anthon> > Centos-6 compatible packages are available from the official sudo > webpage. It's a later version of sudo and I'm not sure if that will > cause problems. I've tried installing it and so-far so-good. > > https://www.sudo.ws/download.html One minor problem - if you have sudo conf

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-27 Thread Christian Anthon
Centos-6 compatible packages are available from the official sudo webpage. It's a later version of sudo and I'm not sure if that will cause problems. I've tried installing it and so-far so-good. https://www.sudo.ws/download.html Cheers, Christian. On 27/01/2021 08.38, Gionatan Danti wrote: H

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-27 Thread Maxim Shpakov
I think it is just not released yet. OL6 is on support track still On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 12:33, Simon Matter wrote: > > Hi > > > > You can use oracle linux 6 , it is still supported (till March 2021) > > But I don't find this sudo update or the recent openssl update in their > repos? Is this fo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-27 Thread Gionatan Danti
Il 2021-01-27 09:34 Walter H. ha scritto: is that what you expect to find? https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0227 Yes, something similar... Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-27 Thread Simon Matter
> Hi > > You can use oracle linux 6 , it is still supported (till March 2021) But I don't find this sudo update or the recent openssl update in their repos? Is this for paying customers only or what? Simon > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 09:38, Gionatan Danti wrote: > >> Hi all, >> do you know if a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-27 Thread Maxim Shpakov
Hi You can use oracle linux 6 , it is still supported (till March 2021) On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 09:38, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Hi all, > do you know if a fix for sudo CVE-2021-3156 is available for CentOS 6? > > While CentOS 6 is now supported anymore, RedHat has it under its > payedsupport agre

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 fix sudo CVE-2021-3156

2021-01-27 Thread Walter H.
is that what you expect to find? https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0227 On 27.01.2021 08:38, Gionatan Danti wrote: Hi all, do you know if a fix for sudo CVE-2021-3156 is available for CentOS 6? While CentOS 6 is now supported anymore, RedHat has it under its payedsupport agreement (se

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 vs 7

2020-04-01 Thread Mark Milhollan
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020, Divine Tanyingoh wrote: On centos 6 I cannot ping the hostname and get a reply without first resolving in the /etc/hosts file by adding a new entry: 192.168.0.47 server1.example.com. But for centos 7 I am able to ping the hostname and get a reply even when I have not made

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 vs 7

2020-03-31 Thread Divine Tanyingoh
Thanks On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 11:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Divine Tanyingoh > wrote: > > > Issue: After installing vms on vmware, I noticed a difference in behavior > > between centos 6 vs 7. On centos 6 I cannot ping the hostname and get a > > reply withou

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 vs 7

2020-03-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Divine Tanyingoh wrote: > Issue: After installing vms on vmware, I noticed a difference in behavior > between centos 6 vs 7. On centos 6 I cannot ping the hostname and get a > reply without first resolving in the /etc/hosts file by adding a new entry: > 192.168.0.47

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 SELinux question: inbound ssh.

2019-08-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 8/17/19 6:42 PM, Robert Heller wrote: Is there some hack to get SELinux to cooperate with this scheme? restorecon -r -v /var/lib/amanda/.ssh I haven't tested this, but there *is* a context specified for that path in /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts. ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6/EPel: Missing EPel package?

2019-05-18 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 18.05.19 20:14, Robert Heller wrote: > The EPel repo has a *nearly* complete collection of QT5 packages. One > important one that *seems* to be missing: qmake. > > There does not seem to be a package containing qmake in the collection of QT5 > packages for CentOS 6! There is /usr/lib64/qt5/

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and 389 Directory Server

2019-02-07 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
> Am 07.02.2019 um 19:16 schrieb Eugene Poole : > > I'm not sure it this is the correct location to ask these questions, but ... > > In the past when I worked for a living the place where I worked had thousands > of RHEL Linux servers on various hardware, but the access was controlled by > Wi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.X, iptables 1.47 and GeoLite2 Country Database

2019-01-15 Thread Phil Perry
On 16/01/2019 02:04, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 07:43:02AM +, Phil Perry (ppe...@elrepo.org) wrote: On 15/01/2019 01:29, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:29:45AM +, Phil Perry (ppe...@elrepo.org) wrote: On 14/01/2019 07:09, Jobst Schmalenbach

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.X, iptables 1.47 and GeoLite2 Country Database

2019-01-15 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 07:43:02AM +, Phil Perry (ppe...@elrepo.org) wrote: > On 15/01/2019 01:29, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:29:45AM +, Phil Perry (ppe...@elrepo.org) > > wrote: > > > On 14/01/2019 07:09, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > Below is my script for cre

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.X, iptables 1.47 and GeoLite2 Country Database

2019-01-14 Thread Phil Perry
On 15/01/2019 01:29, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:29:45AM +, Phil Perry (ppe...@elrepo.org) wrote: On 14/01/2019 07:09, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Hi I use ipdeny's aggregated country lists to do the same thing: http://www.ipdeny.com/ipblocks/data/aggregated/ I ju

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.X, iptables 1.47 and GeoLite2 Country Database

2019-01-14 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Monday, January 14, 2019 7:29 AM + Phil Perry wrote: I use ipdeny's aggregated country lists to do the same thing: http://www.ipdeny.com/ipblocks/data/aggregated/ I just feed this data directly into ipset/iptables via a script running on my firewall (not a C6 box). ipset is a really

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.X, iptables 1.47 and GeoLite2 Country Database

2019-01-14 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:29:45AM +, Phil Perry (ppe...@elrepo.org) wrote: > On 14/01/2019 07:09, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > > Hi > I use ipdeny's aggregated country lists to do the same thing: > > http://www.ipdeny.com/ipblocks/data/aggregated/ > > I just feed this data directly into ips

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.X, iptables 1.47 and GeoLite2 Country Database

2019-01-13 Thread Phil Perry
On 14/01/2019 07:09, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Hi Specs in subject line: CentOS 6.X all latest patches), iptables 1.47, Apache2.2 I use the Geolite legacy databases together with iptables 1.47 to filter traffic for a variety of ports and only allow .AU traffic to have access. I use ipdeny's

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 i386 - meltdown and spectre

2018-03-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/09/2018 12:46 PM, Peter Wood wrote: > Hi Johnny, > > Thank you for your reply. > > It seems to me that my message may have came around as offensive but that > was not my intend. I have basic understanding how things work and when I > said CentOS I actually meant Red Hat and all its derivati

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 i386 - meltdown and spectre

2018-03-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Peter Wood wrote: > Awesome. Thank you. > > Embarrassing but I can't find the Q&A page with this question. Can you > please post a link to it. > > Thanks, > > -- Peter Here it is: https://access.redhat.com/articles/3327321

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 i386 - meltdown and spectre

2018-03-12 Thread Peter Wood
Awesome. Thank you. Embarrassing but I can't find the Q&A page with this question. Can you please post a link to it. Thanks, -- Peter On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Peter Wood > wrote: > > > Anyway, I'm stuck with a few 32bit systems exp

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 i386 - meltdown and spectre

2018-03-09 Thread Phil Perry
On 09/03/18 19:16, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Peter Wood wrote: Anyway, I'm stuck with a few 32bit systems exposed to customers and I have to come up with an answer to their question about meltdown/spectre. At this point all I can say is that Red Hat hasn't patched 32bi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 i386 - meltdown and spectre

2018-03-09 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Peter Wood wrote: > Anyway, I'm stuck with a few 32bit systems exposed to customers and I have > to come up with an answer to their question about meltdown/spectre. At this > point all I can say is that Red Hat hasn't patched 32bit systems but that > is hard to be

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 i386 - meltdown and spectre

2018-03-09 Thread Peter Wood
Hi Johnny, Thank you for your reply. It seems to me that my message may have came around as offensive but that was not my intend. I have basic understanding how things work and when I said CentOS I actually meant Red Hat and all its derivatives. I asked CentOS community because that's the communi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 i386 - meltdown and spectre

2018-03-09 Thread Johnny Hughes
I have built all the source code releases from upstream for RHEL-6 regarding meltdown /spectre and released those into packages into the CentOS Linux 6.9 updates repository. As to whether or not either Arch (x86_64 or i386) is or is not vulnerable, the CentOS team does not test for or make claims

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: Yum downloadonly changes local source repositories (and CentOS 7)

2018-02-14 Thread Danny Smit
For what its worth, I managed to get around the problem with a small patch on yum itself: --- ORIG/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py 2017-03-22 05:32:26.0 + +++ NEW/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py 2018-02-14 09:14:04.879902463 + @@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ cla

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Samba 4 specific question

2017-12-13 Thread Clint Dilks
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Kienker, Fred wrote: > I am setting up a Samba 4 installation on CentOS 6.9. I have installed > the samba4, samba4-common, and samba4-libs with all of the dependencies > using YUM which appear to be all of the samba4 packages which are > available. > > > > In the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

2017-11-05 Thread Sorin Srbu
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark > Haney > Sent: den 3 november 2017 18:03 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives? > > > I'll toss my two cents worth in havin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

2017-11-05 Thread Sorin Srbu
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert > Nichols > Sent: den 3 november 2017 14:46 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives? > > How would you recover if that server were suddenly d

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

2017-11-05 Thread Sorin Srbu
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of hw > Sent: den 3 november 2017 12:10 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives? > > I think I would try to create a VM that has the physical disks pass

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

2017-11-03 Thread Mark Haney
On 11/03/2017 12:48 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: On 11/03/2017 09:02 AM, hw wrote: Robert Nichols wrote: How would you recover if that server were suddenly destroyed, let's say by a power supply failure that fried the motherboard and all the disks? If you can't bring up a machine on new, bare i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

2017-11-03 Thread Robert Nichols
On 11/03/2017 09:02 AM, hw wrote: Robert Nichols wrote: How would you recover if that server were suddenly destroyed, let's say by a power supply failure that fried the motherboard and all the disks? If you can't bring up a machine on new, bare iron starting with nothing but your backups and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

2017-11-03 Thread hw
Robert Nichols wrote: On 11/03/2017 06:09 AM, hw wrote: Sorin Srbu wrote: Hello all, This week I've tested out a few ways to do a P2V on a rather ancient CentOS 6 server, in order to move it to a Hyper-V host. So far my tests have failed rather spectacularly. Initially I was set on doing a si

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

2017-11-03 Thread Robert Nichols
On 11/03/2017 06:09 AM, hw wrote: Sorin Srbu wrote: Hello all, This week I've tested out a few ways to do a P2V on a rather ancient CentOS 6 server, in order to move it to a Hyper-V host. So far my tests have failed rather spectacularly. Initially I was set on doing a simple dd-routine, but wa

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

2017-11-03 Thread hw
Sorin Srbu wrote: Hello all, This week I've tested out a few ways to do a P2V on a rather ancient CentOS 6 server, in order to move it to a Hyper-V host. So far my tests have failed rather spectacularly. Initially I was set on doing a simple dd-routine, but was told that the server cannot be ta

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 SCL - httpd24 still being updated?

2017-10-29 Thread Eric
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/28/2017 03:57 PM, Eric wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Specifically this is in reference to RHSA-2017:2483, which should > increment > > the httpd24 packages to 25-9 in the SCL. The SA was released on August > > 16th 2017, so it has some ag

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 SCL - httpd24 still being updated?

2017-10-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/28/2017 03:57 PM, Eric wrote: > Hello, > > Specifically this is in reference to RHSA-2017:2483, which should increment > the httpd24 packages to 25-9 in the SCL. The SA was released on August > 16th 2017, so it has some age to it, but there's no corresponding CESA on > it and the SCL for 6

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 for ARM?

2017-10-23 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:54:04 -0400 mark wrote: > Hi, folks, > > So, I want to rebuild my "ancient" HP netbook, from the ancient > ubuntu netbook remix. Is there an *ARM* .iso, or net install > somewhere? I'm not finding it, googling. Lots of Raspberry Pi, but Centos has two ARM efforts

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and crypttab

2017-06-22 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 22.06.2017 um 21:05 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > > Folks, > > I have an issue: I've gotten that drive that I posted about the other > day encrypted, and things were looking good... until there was a > problem with another RAID attached to the box, and I wound up having to > reboot. > > W

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and luksOpen

2017-06-20 Thread m . roth
Leon, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 20.06.2017 um 17:12 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: >> Leon Fauster wrote: Am 20.06.2017 um 16:53 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: I've done that, and made the filesystem, but I can't mount it. CentOS 6. I have the entry in /etc/crypttab, and a key in /

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and luksOpen

2017-06-20 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 20.06.2017 um 17:12 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > > Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 20.06.2017 um 16:53 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: >>> >>> Upgraded a RAID. Copied everything from backup. >>> >>> And then my manager said I had to encrypt the drive. >>> >>> I've done that, and made the filesystem, b

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and luksOpen

2017-06-20 Thread m . roth
Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 20.06.2017 um 16:53 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: >> >> Upgraded a RAID. Copied everything from backup. >> >> And then my manager said I had to encrypt the drive. >> >> I've done that, and made the filesystem, but I can't mount it. >> >> CentOS 6. >> I have the entry in /etc/c

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and luksOpen

2017-06-20 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 20.06.2017 um 16:53 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > > Upgraded a RAID. Copied everything from backup. > > And then my manager said I had to encrypt the drive. > > I've done that, and made the filesystem, but I can't mount it. > > CentOS 6. > I have the entry in /etc/crypttab, and a key in /etc

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS 6] Possible bug in updating glibc?

2017-06-02 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 06:40:57AM -0400, Leam Hall wrote: > I'm running a KVM host on updated CentOS 6. The guest is built from the > CentOS 6.9 dvd1 with just @base and @core package groups. > > When I went to install mysql it failed due to incompatibilities with the > libcc versions. Updated ju

Re: [CentOS] {centos 6} errors in libvirtd, all sites down, need advice

2017-05-29 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 29.05.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Political Gateway : > > 2016-09-07 15:56:13.228+: 24704: error : virFileRewrite:507 : > cannot write data to file '/var/run/libvirt/qemu/main.mywebsite.com.xml.new': > No space left on device clearly stated - no space left on device. -- LF

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 dhcpd custom log issues

2017-05-26 Thread Mark Haney
I've done more testing and I've found something very interesting. I've tested logging with our entire string (which will be below) with slight changes to the 'if' statement solely looking at the 'dhcp-message-type = ' parameter. Of the four message types we routinely see some work and some don't:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-12 Thread John Hodrien
On Thu, 11 May 2017, Darr247 wrote: If you disable Intel Speedstep in the BIOS it should lock the CPU to its fastest speed, but you lose power saving during idle. Could you possibly also find that you're more restricted in your use of TurboBoost in that state (if indeed it works properly witho

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread Darr247
> Here's mine. Interesting differences: If you disable Intel Speedstep in the BIOS it should lock the CPU to its fastest speed, but you lose power saving during idle. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:48 PM, ken wrote: > On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb L

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread ken
On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster : Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster : https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster : > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster : >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6 variant support for it? >> >> A

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster : > > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel > > shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about > > Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake > > has the current EL6 variant support for it? > > Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. I foun

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and pxeboot

2017-04-11 Thread isdtor
> Also, in case you're ever interested, I've written a script that > generates suitable IPv4-based filenames for pre-default usage: > >https://github.com/heinlein/pxehex gethostip ... I simply rebuilt the relevant C5 rpms for C6, system-config-netboot and system-config-netboot-cmd, IIRC.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and pxeboot

2017-04-11 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab80b83d > > > .../pxelinux.cfg/01-88-99-aa-bb-cc-dd > > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A8025B > > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A8025 > > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A802 > > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A80 > > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A8 > > > .../pxelinux.cfg

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and pxeboot

2017-04-11 Thread John R Pierce
On 4/11/2017 2:01 PM, Bruce Ferrell wrote: Whatever openether.org is, it sounds buggy. there's no such domain.there's a softether.org, which is a VPN package, and some kinda github.com/openether which appears to be Ethereum blockchain based distributed computing related. -- john r pie

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and pxeboot

2017-04-11 Thread Bruce Ferrell
On 04/11/2017 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Pete Biggs wrote: We've been using pxeboot to pull up a menu, to build or rebuild machines for years. We have this new server, and it fails. Times out. What's happening is that it tries in this order .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and pxeboot

2017-04-11 Thread m . roth
Pete Biggs wrote: > >>We've been using pxeboot to pull up a menu, to build or rebuild >> machines for years. We have this new server, and it fails. Times out. >> What's happening is that it tries in this order >> .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab80b83d >> .../pxelinux

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and pxeboot

2017-04-11 Thread Pete Biggs
>We've been using pxeboot to pull up a menu, to build or rebuild > machines for years. We have this new server, and it fails. Times out. > What's happening is that it tries in this order > .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab80b83d > .../pxelinux.cfg/01-88-99-aa-bb-cc-

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and pxeboot

2017-04-11 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Hi, folks, We've been using pxeboot to pull up a menu, to build or rebuild machines for years. We have this new server, and it fails. Times out. What's happening is that it tries in this order .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab8

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, apcupsd

2017-04-07 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:12:55PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > >Anyone know what apcupsd is no longer in the EPEL repo for CentOS/RHEL > 6? It's still in for 7. As far as I can tell, the el6 EPEL package hasn't been built for a while. (looking at https://bodhi.fedoraproject

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, flash-plugin crashing - anyone have a clue?

2017-02-01 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2017-02-01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: [...] > I just tried, both on 6.8 and 7.3, and yum tells me "nothing to do", so I > can't downgrade. By the way, googling, I find it's been filed as a bug > with upstream: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411972 > > mark For what it's w

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, flash-plugin crashing - anyone have a clue?

2017-02-01 Thread m . roth
Fred Smith wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:54:58AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I wrote: >> Anyone else seeing this? I'm playing streaming media, and after about 10 or 15 min, flash-plugin crashes. I've had this happen today on streams from two separate radio stations. >> * >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, flash-plugin crashing - anyone have a clue?

2017-02-01 Thread Fred Smith
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:54:58AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I wrote: > Anyone else seeing this? I'm playing streaming media, and after about 10 > or 15 min, flash-plugin crashes. I've had this happen today on streams > from two separate radio stations. > * > > So, is anyone els

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, flash-plugin crashing - anyone have a clue?

2017-02-01 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I wrote: > Anyone else seeing this? I'm playing streaming media, and after about 10 > or 15 min, flash-plugin crashes. I've had this happen today on streams > from two separate radio stations. > * > > So, is anyone else having this issue? Not only am I having i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, flash-plugin crashing

2017-01-30 Thread Richard
> Date: Monday, January 30, 2017 13:56:24 -0500 > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > > Anyone else seeing this? I'm playing streaming media, and after > about 10 or 15 min, flash-plugin crashes. I've had this happen > today on streams from two separate radio stations. > >mark Care to provide any spe

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, firefox, PIV cards

2016-12-07 Thread m . roth
Hi, Todd, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, JXVS wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us further wrote: > ## > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >>Up until a few weeks ago, it worked as it has been for years: >> firefox,security device is libcoolkey, and pcscd. >> >>Today, I go to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, firefox, PIV cards

2016-12-07 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, JXVS
m.roth at 5-cent.us further wrote: ## m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > >Up until a few weeks ago, it worked as it has been for years: firefox, > security device is libcoolkey, and pcscd. > >Today, I go to use it (I have done updates sine I last used it), and > try prefe

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: environment variables and cronjobs ...

2016-12-01 Thread Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE
Le 01/12/2016 à 17:23, Liam O'Toole a écrit : On 2016-12-01, Walter H. wrote: Hello, in /etc/cron.d/test I've this: 50 15 * * * root ( date ; echo "---" ; env ; echo "---" ; set ) /tmp/test.txt and I thought I would be shown environment variables which are defined in e.g. /etc/profiles

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, firefox, PIV cards

2016-12-01 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > >Up until a few weeks ago, it worked as it has been for years: firefox, > security device is libcoolkey, and pcscd. > >Today, I go to use it (I have done updates sine I last used it), and > try preferences->advanced->certificates, and it hangs. My most

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: environment variables and cronjobs ...

2016-12-01 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2016-12-01, Walter H. wrote: > Hello, > > in > > /etc/cron.d/test > > I've this: > > 50 15 * * * root ( date ; echo "---" ; env ; echo "---" ; set ) >>>/tmp/test.txt > > and I thought I would be shown environment variables which are defined > in > > e.g. /etc/profiles.d/proxy.sh or /etc/profil

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, Apache 2.2.15 and SNI?

2016-11-24 Thread Walter H.
On Tue, November 22, 2016 22:40, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Sun, November 20, 2016 12:43, Walter H. wrote: > >> >> https://box.domain1.com works >> but >> https://box.domain2.com results in 'Certificate name mismatch' >> >> > > What are the contents of the certificate(s) you have configured for

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, Apache 2.2.15 and SNI?

2016-11-22 Thread James B. Byrne
On Sun, November 20, 2016 12:43, Walter H. wrote: > > https://box.domain1.com works > but > https://box.domain2.com results in 'Certificate name mismatch' > > What are the contents of the certificate(s) you have configured for tls? What AltSubject names, if any, do the certificate(s) support?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, Apache 2.2.15 and SNI? Solved ...

2016-11-21 Thread Walter H.
It is solved, I don't know why but SNI works only with hosts that are declared with ServerName and not with ServerAlias so I did the following ... I made an include file that contained everything of the virtualhost except the ServerAdmin and ServerName declarations and did this: ServerAdmin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, Apache 2.2.15 and SNI?

2016-11-20 Thread Walter H.
On 20.11.2016 18:33, David Nelson wrote: It doesn't appear you have a ServerName or ServerAlias for the naked domains (sans subdomain), so they're both being answered by the first VirtualHost entry? this is not the problem meant https://box.domain1.com works but https://box.domain2.com result

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, Apache 2.2.15 and SNI?

2016-11-20 Thread David Nelson
It doesn't appear you have a ServerName or ServerAlias for the naked domains (sans subdomain), so they're both being answered by the first VirtualHost entry? > On Nov 20, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Walter H. wrote: > > Hello, > > is Apache 2.2 which is part of the CentOS distribution capable of SNI?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Arun Khan
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Alexander Farber wrote: > You should have provided more info initially. > > "goes out in text format" might mean several things. > I don't know what you mean by "several things" In the context of logwatch the only options are HTML or TEXT. Please see my OP. Tha

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Alexander Farber
You should have provided more info initially. "goes out in text format" might mean several things. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Farber > wrote: > > logwatch is run as cronjob. > > Let's take cron out of the picture. Invoking lo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Arun Khan
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Farber wrote: > logwatch is run as cronjob. Let's take cron out of the picture. Invoking logwatch from an interactive shell -- no joy. The report still goes out in text format. -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Alexander Farber
logwatch is run as cronjob. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Alexander Farber > wrote: > > No, I mean there is sometimes a variable for mail format too: > > The HTML formatting is a logwatch option, invoked through the > logwatch.conf file. >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Arun Khan
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Alexander Farber wrote: > No, I mean there is sometimes a variable for mail format too: The HTML formatting is a logwatch option, invoked through the logwatch.conf file. -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody

2016-08-30 Thread Pat Haley
The setting the Domain = line in /etc/idmapd.conf option solved our problem Thanks On 08/29/2016 07:23 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:59:31 -0400 Pat Haley wrote: We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody Here are my notes for dealing with this issue: If all users co

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody

2016-08-30 Thread m . roth
Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:59:31PM -0400, Pat Haley wrote: >> ... We >> noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the >> group). > > If its NFSv4, then its most likely a problem with your idmapper. Make > sure that the rpc.idmapd is running on your

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody

2016-08-30 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:59:31PM -0400, Pat Haley wrote: > ... We > noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the group). If its NFSv4, then its most likely a problem with your idmapper. Make sure that the rpc.idmapd is running on your client, and that your server has appr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-29 Thread Alexander Farber
No, I mean there is sometimes a variable for mail format too: # crontab -l CONTENT_TYPE="text/plain; charset=utf-8" MAILFROM=webmas...@xxx.de MAILTO=alexander.far...@xxx.com LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PGHOST=/tmp #minute hourmdaymonth wdaycommand On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Arun Khan w

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-29 Thread Arun Khan
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Alexander Farber wrote: > Maybe the format is set in > > sudo crontab -l You mean in the way it is invoked from the cron entry? -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/li

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody

2016-08-29 Thread Pat Haley
I believe NFSv4. On the machine that contains the physical disks (is that the "server" or the "NSF mount"?) the relevant line from /etc/fstab seems to be UUID=bde58f42-4ac4-4763-b0a8-f83723f0e2a0 /home ext4defaults 1 2 while on my front-end machine its mseas-data2:/home /hom

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody

2016-08-29 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:59:31 -0400 Pat Haley wrote: > We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody Here are my notes for dealing with this issue: If all users come up as nobody on a nfs mount: Add nfs server name to the Domain = line in /etc/idmapd.conf on both the server and the clients

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody

2016-08-29 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/29/2016 3:59 PM, Pat Haley wrote: We are running a cluster under CentOS 6.6. We recently attached a new NAS device, running CentOS 6.8 and rsync'd our user file system to it. We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the group). We copied over the /etc/passwd an

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-28 Thread Alexander Farber
Maybe the format is set in sudo crontab -l Am Montag, 29. August 2016 schrieb Arun Khan : > CentOS 6 (amd64) up to date with latest security / bug fixes. > > The logwatch reports come in plain text even though the config states HTML. > > > mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t" > TmpDir = /tmp > Mail

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-27 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, John R Pierce wrote: On 7/26/2016 2:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yeah, well, the thing is, for years I've just been shoving ordinary SATA drives into the same server, to use to copy from other machines via rsync, getting a drive ready to replace in another server. I'v

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 7/26/2016 2:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yeah, well, the thing is, for years I've just been shoving ordinary SATA drives into the same server, to use to copy from other machines via rsync, getting a drive ready to replace in another server. I've never had trouble with SATA. This is the first

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread m . roth
John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/26/2016 2:38 PM, Peter wrote: >> On 27/07/16 09:11,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> >This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me >>> >01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS >>> 2008 [Falcon] (rev 03) >>> >so it*should* accept an SA

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 7/26/2016 2:38 PM, Peter wrote: On 27/07/16 09:11,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me >01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2008 >[Falcon] (rev 03) >so it*should* accept an SAS drive. I've got a Cheetah that's a f

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread Peter
On 27/07/16 09:11, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me > 01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2008 > [Falcon] (rev 03) > so it *should* accept an SAS drive. I've got a Cheetah that's a few years > old, and having pulled

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, iscsi issue, [SOLVED]

2016-07-25 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > >Ok, I had iscsi working. Then I umounted the filesystem, and deleted > the logical volume, then the RAID, and recreated it with a) 4 more > drives (or was it six?), gave it a new RG name, and a new VD name. > >I can ping the IP, but can't rediscover i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, mptfusion software? sort of solved

2016-07-13 Thread m . roth
More googling, and then something I wouldn't have thought of: smartctl doesn't work on this HBA against /dev/sd*. HOWEVER, it's happy as a clam against /dev/sgx, and there's my RAID, /dev/sg0 and /dev/sg1 (which lshw also was able to show me), but now, at least, I can run smartctl tests on the driv

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >