SOLVED: On the original topic, the problem seems to have gone away
with the latest kernel:
marichter 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 10 19:05:06 EDT 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
centos-release-5-5.el5.centos.x86_64
Thanks to all who may be held responsible. :-)
Mark
___
Frank Thommen wrote:
>
> The problem was reported for
>
> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
> (rev a2)
>
> it seems you're lucky having the MCP61 ;-)
The MCP61 still uses the snd_hda_intel driver, and the upstream ALSA
'fix' is to blacklist all NVidia chipse
Mark wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, James Pearson
> wrote:
>> Frank Thommen wrote:
Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ?
>>> sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post:
>>>
>>> [r...@shelley ~]# lspci
>>> ...
>>> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High
James Pearson wrote:
> Frank Thommen wrote:
>>> Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ?
>> sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post:
>>
>> [r...@shelley ~]# lspci
>> ...
>> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
>> (rev a2)
>>
>> [r...@shelley ~]# ls
Mark wrote:
> I'm not having sound problems
>
> 00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2)
It might still be worth adding 'enable_msi=0' to the 'options
snd-hda-intel' line in /etc/modprobe.conf to see if it makes any
difference after a reboot ...
James
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, James Pearson
wrote:
> Frank Thommen wrote:
>>>Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ?
>>
>> sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post:
>>
>> [r...@shelley ~]# lspci
>> ...
>> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
>> (
Frank Thommen wrote:
>>Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ?
>
> sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post:
>
> [r...@shelley ~]# lspci
> ...
> 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
> (rev a2)
>
> [r...@shelley ~]# lsmod
> ...
> snd_hda_intel
James Pearson wrote:
> Frank Thommen wrote:
>
>> I'm experiencing similar problems on a DELL Optiplex 740 with the same
>> CPU (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ @ 2.60 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 80
>> GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 HD). But in my case the slowness is not
>> restricted to OO, but the w
Frank Thommen wrote:
> I'm experiencing similar problems on a DELL Optiplex 740 with the same
> CPU (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ @ 2.60 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 80
> GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 HD). But in my case the slowness is not
> restricted to OO, but the whole systems is slowed down.
Mark wrote:
> I recently updated to OpenOffice 3.2 and I noticed that it, and the
> latest Evolution, seem to be incredibly slow for some operations.
>
> E.g., in OO, about half the time when I'm editing something, it takes
> anywhere from 10-30 seconds for OO to respond to a click on one of the
>
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:30 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> You can do:
> rpm -q --changelog kernel >> changelog.log \
> rpm -q --changelog kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 >> changelog.log
>
> To view the changelog for patches and BZs Applied to the kernel or any
> rpm. As in load up the newest one and run the
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:01 -0700, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Mark wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:54 AM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> >> What is your running kernel? Newest. Asking because it may be that your
> >> problem is machine independent as a client of mine on a Compaq had
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:54 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
>> What is your running kernel? Newest. Asking because it may be that your
>> problem is machine independent as a client of mine on a Compaq had the
>> same problem 6 months ago. Fix it I just removed t
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:54 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> Try killing Seamonkey/nspluginwrapper ie, shutdown then try.
>
No difference.
> What is your running kernel? Newest. Asking because it may be that your
> problem is machine independent as a client of mine on a Compaq had the
> same problem 6 month
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 16:36 -0700, Mark wrote:
> Did most of that (except spamd in Evo) and nothing showed up in top -
> the big CPU hog was SeaMonkey at 23% of one core, the others were all
> idle or lower use. Almost no swapping:
---
Try killing Seamonkey/nspluginwrapper ie, shutdown then try.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:46 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> Latest version for CentOS 5.5 is
> openoffice.org-writer-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.1
> Where did you obtain 3.2 from? That may be your slowness as on my 64
> bit workstation I see none at all. Loads in about 3 secs.
>
I have been using releases direct fro
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 20:00 -0700, Mark wrote:
> I recently updated to OpenOffice 3.2 and I noticed that it, and the
> latest Evolution, seem to be incredibly slow for some operations.
Latest version for CentOS 5.5 is
openoffice.org-writer-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.1
Where did you obtain 3.2 from? That m
17 matches
Mail list logo
