On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 23:46 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >If it won't "wok", you'l have to "cook" up something. :-) YUK, YUK!
>
> Now that's ironic (you'l):P
Yeah, but not as good since it doesn't lend itself easily to "punning".
>
--
Bill
___
>If it won't "wok", you'l have to "cook" up something. :-) YUK, YUK!
Now that's ironic (you'l):P
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sunday 06 July 2008 11:39:50 William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:52 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
> >
> >
> > The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see if it has previously
> > installed /usr/bin/false and find that it hasn't. In that case it won't
> > wok.
>
> If it won't "
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:52 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
>
> The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see if it has previously
> installed /usr/bin/false and find that it hasn't. In that case it won't wok.
If it won't "wok", you'l have to "cook" up something. :-) YUK, YUK!
>
--
Bill
___
On Sunday 06 July 2008 07:20:33 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >Why don't you try it and see what happens.
>
> I did, which is what lead me to believe it only checks the db:)
> jlc
Sorry,
Tony
Then you have a problem ;-)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
>Why don't you try it and see what happens.
I did, which is what lead me to believe it only checks the db:)
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sunday 06 July 2008 05:07:38 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >I had no trouble copying it or linking it.
>
> Yes, but how does that satisfy yum?
> jlc
If the dependancy is purely on /usr/bin./false then when you copy it I think
yum should find it.
The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see
>I had no trouble copying it or linking it.
Yes, but how does that satisfy yum?
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Saturday 05 July 2008 16:47:03 Jay Leafey wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> > I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing
> > suggesting it needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false"
> > yields nothing.
> >
> > My CentOS 5.1 machines don't have this, and
>Wierd, I just confirmed the issue. There is not a /usr/bin/false, but there
>IS a /bin/false on a stock 5.2 install. You might check in the >rpmforge
>forums/list archives for some mention of this problem.
>
>I thought I might be able to symlink /bin/false to /usr/bin/false (a kludge, I
>admi
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing
suggesting it
needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false" yields nothing.
My CentOS 5.1 machines don't have this, and this is the same list of yum install
items I always use when setting u
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 09:09:36AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing
> suggesting it
^^^
> needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false" yields nothing.
false in /bin/f
12 matches
Mail list logo
