Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2

Hi Roland, Here is the link for you. http://iso.linuxquestions.org/centos/centos-5.2/ Regards, Krishna On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Roland RoLaNd wrote: > > Hello, > > where can i get centos 5.2 64 bit ? > all i can find is 5.5 ... > any help? > > __

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Roland RoLaNd spake: > Hello, > > where can i get centos 5.2 64 bit ? > all i can find is 5.5 ... > any help? http://vault.centos.org/5.2/isos/ HTH, Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 mysql build

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > I wanted to enable blackhole  and CSV engine in the mysql server > so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment > with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and tried > building it

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 mysql build

2010/1/24 Rajagopal Swaminathan : > Greetings, > I wanted to enable blackhole  and CSV engine in the mysql server > so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment > with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and tried > building it. I have a 5.2 centos box on

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 ISO not available ???!!!!

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:31:01 +0530 Agnello George wrote: > this is really wired ... i searched in all mirrors ( i hope ) ... but i > don't seem to find then availability of cent os 5.2 iso . http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.2/readme -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melville

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 ISO not available ???!!!!

Agnello George wrote: > Hi All > > this is really wired ... i searched in all mirrors ( i hope ) ... but > i don't seem to find then availability of cent os 5.2 iso .. ... the > thing is all our perl version depen on Cent os 5.2 ... > > Does any one know whyCentod 5.2 is not available !! ...

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 install: mbr or no bootloader ?

Julian responded > You need to select 'install bootloader' to the hard disk, and then advanced > options, > where you can tell it to install > it to /boot instead of MBR. > You should have created /boot in the partitioning stage. > I assume you are using some other boot manager > Julian Thomas

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 install: mbr or no bootloader ?

On Mon, 18 May 2009 15:58:26 -0700 jackson byers wrote: > > >One peculiarity: >I believe I was given the choice of: >--installing the bootloader into mbr >or >--no bootloader install > >I did not want my mbr overwritten, so I chose no bootloader > >Why is there no choice of 1st sector of root par

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:30 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of William L. Maltby > >Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of William L. Maltby >Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem > >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

JohnS wrote: > KVM Switch? Drop down to "init 3". Bring up a shell window to do so. > Reconfigure X. init 3 is runlevel 3. > > I had a machine with a nvidia card in it and added in a KVM Switch and > then X would not even boot. Removed the kvm and no problems. So I had to > reconfigure X to work wi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 21:25 +0100, Dick Holland wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote: > > > I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo > > > attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescre

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

BTW, I *hope* you meant CentOS 5.3?! Lots of changes, enhanced security, etc. are included. You ought to upgrade if you haven't and have no compelling reason to freeze on 5.2. IF you do, good luck with the additional workload and concerns that may be caused. -- Bill ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 21:25 +0100, Dick Holland wrote: > > The xorg.conf looks OK to me (but I'm a bit of a noob really). I'll > check it against the other system (which is Fedora 9). > > I have Googled quite extensively and found no help - but thanks for your > very prompt suggestions, Bill.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote: > > I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo > > attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen monitor. I'm driving the > > monitor at 1680*1050, and the pi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote: > I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo > attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen monitor. I'm driving the > monitor at 1680*1050, and the picture is compressed into the right-hand > two-thirds of the screen.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and wired Ethernet on a Macbook Pro?

Scott R. Ehrlich wrote: > Is it possible to get wired Ethernet running on this laptop under CentOS > without having to create a virtual machine installation of CentOS? > > If so, what is the magic? if you send me the device, I will have a go at making it all justwork :) -- Karanbir Singh : htt

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 ,5.3 and GFS2

Fabian Arrotin wrote: > FM wrote: > > Do you know whent Centos 5.3 will be ready ? > > Can I install my GFS2 FS with centos 5.2 and then "simply" upgrade to > > 5.3 without reinstallation ? > > No, you'll have manual intervention because now in 5.3 gfs2 module is > included by default in the 2.6

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 ,5.3 and GFS2

FM wrote: > Hello, > I will create a Xen cluster and using GFS2 (with conga, ...) to create > a new Xen cluster. > I know that GFS2 is prod ready since RHEL 5.3. > > Do you know whent Centos 5.3 will be ready ? > Can I install my GFS2 FS with centos 5.2 and then "simply" upgrade to > 5.3 withou

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot

tblader wrote: > The system is an Asus m2n-e mainboard, amd x2 6400, 8 gig of ram. > It's got and LSI 8704 ELP raid card, a couple of realtek gig nics > and SATA dvd drive. My home desktop machine is an M2N-E Mobo, and works fine with the LiveCD. [r...@chamkaur ~]# dmidecode | grep -i m2n-e

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot

> Could you please provide a description of the components in the system > you are trying to boot it in? > Do you have at least 256-512 MB of RAM? Hi, The CD/DVD image was downloaded from mirrors.gigenet: http://mirrors.gigenet.com/centos/5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-LiveCD.iso The system is an

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot

Michael Peterson wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:44:43 -0500: > What do you mean by this? > Is this because you changed the original post and you thought I was > replying to the other part of the original post. Sorry? I did not "change" anything. You replied to *my* posting with questions to the o

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 i m having problem with gnome

I have 2Gbs DDR 2 Ram and swap part of appro 1957 Mbs as I feel i should have Swap Partition of 4 Gbs for a 2 Gbs Ram yes I am hosting about 12 sites and domains on Name-based Virtual Hosts, I got it I have to add some more Gbs of Ram. one more thing on this system there are lost of cron jobs acti

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Michael, next time, could you please reply to the original post instead of > hooking in to others? > > Kai > > What do you mean by this? Is this because you changed the original post and you thought I was replying to the other part of the original post. I was responding

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot

Michael, next time, could you please reply to the original post instead of hooking in to others? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org htt

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Tblader wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:50:48 -0500: > > >> Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD? >> I'm getting this error: >> >> no root yet, udev rule will write symlink >> >> Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink >> to /dev/root and

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot

Tblader wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:50:48 -0500: > Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD? > I'm getting this error: > > no root yet, udev rule will write symlink > > Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink > to /dev/root and then exit the shell. And that is

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 i m having problem with gnome

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tariq Ismail Dalvi wrote: > Hello to all, > > I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server > on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop > gnome everything was working fine now couple of days > back I was using text editor, Fire Fox and GIMP at

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 i m having problem with gnome

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Tariq Ismail Dalvi wrote: > Hello to all, > > I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server > on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop > gnome everything was working fine now couple of days > back I was using text editor, Fire Fox and GIMP at

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Maxim Odinintsev wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: >> Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. >> > Hello > > Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to > reinstall. > Now we want to buy some new servers

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

on 3-4-2009 8:25 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following: > Scott Silva wrote: >> Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. >> > Hello > > Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to > reinstall. > Now we want to buy some new server

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

Scott Silva wrote: > Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. > Hello Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to reinstall. Now we want to buy some new servers, and want to now, before they bayed, which OS install on its, withou

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410

on 3-4-2009 6:49 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following: > Good Day! > > We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server > with Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully > on CentOS 4.5. > This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

> Craig White wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:47 -0700: > > > you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge > > I suggest rolling your own SA. It's as simple as downloading the tarball > and rebuilding it with the included spec file. It's a simple one-line > command and docume

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

Craig White wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:47 -0700: > you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge I suggest rolling your own SA. It's as simple as downloading the tarball and rebuilding it with the included spec file. It's a simple one-line command and documented on the downlo

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

Linux Advocate wrote: > Guys, acording to the quickinstall.txt guide on the mailscanner site, there > is an install.sh file which installs the mailscanner rpm, all the other perl > rpms. Additionally, the site has also clam av and spamassassin installers too? > > any experience on these things?

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

Guys, acording to the quickinstall.txt guide on the mailscanner site, there is an install.sh file which installs the mailscanner rpm, all the other perl rpms. Additionally, the site has also clam av and spamassassin installers too? any experience on these things? could just forego the rpms fr

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

Linux Advocate wrote: > Guys, > > What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? > There is a subscription based repo available from FSL: http://www.fsl.com/index.php/barricademx/mailscanner-repository D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

Linux Advocate wrote: > Guys, > > What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? > RPMforge has clamav and spamassassin, but not mailscanner. Mailscanner has RPMs available on their site. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:/

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 06:32 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote: > Guys, > > What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge mailscanner afaik, only from mailscanner.info Craig ___

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

Linux Advocate wrote: > What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? I don't know a repository with mailscanner, clamav and spamassassin are in rpmforge. Cheers, Ralph pgpchZkedcZge.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing li

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >Hi, > >On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET wrote: >> I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new >> SATA disk, the system don't detects it . >> >> Any idea of what the problem is? > >Even though it's ho

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap

Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET wrote: > I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new > SATA disk, the system don't detects it . > > Any idea of what the problem is? Even though it's hotplug, you have to give Linux a command so that it will sca

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap

/politica_privacidad.htm De: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de Laurent Wandrebeck Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de febrero de 2009 17:29 Para: CentOS mailing list Asunto: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap 2009/2/18 Julio Rodanes - KNET : > Hello, I hav

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap

2009/2/18 Julio Rodanes - KNET : > Hello, I have a server Supermicro 5015B-MT with ICH9R chipset, disk SATAII > and Centos 5.2 > > I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new > SATA disk, the system don't detects it . > > Any idea of what the problem is? Is your sata

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

James B. Byrne wrote on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:52 -0500 (EST): > Does anyone have any idea how this change could occur? There are some security tools that could be configured to reset SUID bits on files in certain paths with their default templates. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get you

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

James B. Byrne wrote: > I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s > /usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are: > > $ ll $(which su) > -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su > > And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much. > > I am certain that I have

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s /usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are: $ ll $(which su) -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much. I am certain that I have not been changing file modes in /usr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

On Wed Jan 14 17:16:01 UTC 2009, nate centos at linuxpowered.net wrote: > It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ? > > From a 5.1 system: > > -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su This is what I have on that host: # ll /bin/su -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /b

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5.2 su -l is failing

James B. Byrne wrote: > Any ideas as to what might be happening here and how I might fix it? It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ? >From a 5.1 system: -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 yum check-update fails - repo change?

On Saturday 13 December 2008 03:32:20 am Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:51 -0800: > > #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/$basearch > > mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5&arch=$ > >basearch > > Hm, not hardcoded t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 running in VMWare 6.5 Firefox failed to connect, but konqueror works well

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Josef Temminghoff wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:47:41 +0100: > >> I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer >> does. > > Does it jump or what? One might assume from the rest that you want to say > you can't make it

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 running in VMWare 6.5 Firefox failed to connect, but konqueror works well

Josef Temminghoff wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:47:41 +0100: > I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer > does. Does it jump or what? One might assume from the rest that you want to say you can't make it display websites or so, but this is just a guess. Provide det

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 + iptables + memcached Problem

I do have such a rule at the top of the rule set. Sorry I did not provide more context. The basic structure of my rule set is: 1. Deny some known bad packet types. 2. Accept ESTABLISHED, RELATED traffic. 3. Accept rules of various sorts (such as the memcached rules). 4. Deny all (catch all rule).

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 + iptables + memcached Problem

Hi, On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:28, Art Age Software wrote: > IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d > 192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT > > s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN=bond0 OUT= SRC=192.168.1.2 > DST=192.168.1.1 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x0

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 yum check-update fails - repo change?

Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:51 -0800: > #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/$basearch > mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5&arch=$basearch Hm, not hardcoded then. I looked again at ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/ The epel mirror is to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 + iptables + memcached Problem

OK, here are the original (stateful) rules reinstated: IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 + iptables + memcached Problem

Thanks for your reply. I originally had stateful rules in place and packets were being dropped. I had just switched to stateless rules in an attempt to fix the problem. I will go back to stateful and update this thread with the new log messages. Thanks. Sam On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Fili

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 + iptables + memcached Problem

Hi, On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 15:45, Art Age Software wrote: > IPTABLES -A XXX -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d > 192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -j ACCEPT > Dec 12 20:33:53 s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN= OUT=bond0 > SRC=192.168.1.1 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 yum check-update fails - repo change?

On Friday 12 December 2008 12:31:47 pm Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:22:46 -0800: > > Anyone know why this happens or what to do? I see the epel mirror has > > changed > > No, the mirror for base changed. > > > Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 yum check-update fails - repo change?

Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:22:46 -0800: > Anyone know why this happens or what to do? I see the epel mirror has changed No, the mirror for base changed. > Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: epel. It doesn't appear to mirror EPEL: ftp://ftp.mu

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 on Vmware Server: Disk space not preallocated -> no disk found by installer

CentOS 5.2 and 4.7 work for me at the latest VMWare Workstation, Server and ESX :-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 on Vmware Server: Disk space not preallocated -> no disk found by installer

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 9:45 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 on Vmware Server: Disk space > not preallocated -> no

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 on Vmware Server: Disk space not preallocated -> no disk found by installer

Les Mikesell wrote: > > I can't see anything to indicate why it doesn't show the disk, but I've > used dynamic disks for installation before. I exclusively use dynamic allocation and it works for me with CentOS 5.2 as a guest. Host is Ubuntu 8.10 -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 on Vmware Server: Disk space not preallocated -> no disk found by installer

Sven wrote: > Hi folks > > I am trying to install CentOS 5.2 in Vmware Server environment. In my > VM disk space is not preallocated for the virtual disk (dynamically). > The installer doesn't find the disk. When preallocating 6 GB there is > no problem. > > See screenshot[0] > > Any ideas? >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 on Vmware Server: Disk space not preallocated -> no disk found by installer

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:01:46PM +0100, Sven wrote: > Hi folks > > I am trying to install CentOS 5.2 in Vmware Server environment. In my > VM disk space is not preallocated for the virtual disk (dynamically). > The installer doesn't find the disk. When preallocating 6 GB there is > no problem.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 install problem

> if use CentOS 5.0 try this way. > 1.make 20GB partition at 3ware. > 2.make 2680GB partition at 3ware. > 3.install CentOS 5.2 on 20GB partition, ignore 2680GB partition. sorry 3.install CentOS 5.0 on 20GB partition, ignore 2680GB partition. > tonoki > __

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 install problem

Michael Kress さんは書きました: > nate wrote: >>> Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel >>> Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5). >>> The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then >>> the first boot will not take place, instead t

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 install problem (SOLVED)

Hi, Michael Kress wrote: >> Try again using a volume that is less than 2TB in size and see >> if it makes a difference? >> > > Just found in the 3ware manual: > "Even though the Linux 2.6 kernel supports partitions larger than 2 TB, > the installers for SuSE and Redhat do not. Turn auto-carvi

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 install problem

nate wrote: >> Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel >> Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5). >> The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then >> the first boot will not take place, instead the system loops. Any hints? >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 install problem

Michael Kress wrote: > Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel > Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5). > The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then > the first boot will not take place, instead the system loops. Any hint

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 install problem

nate wrote: > Michael Kress wrote: >> Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel >> Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5). >> The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then >> the first boot will not take place, instead the syst

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 install problem

Michael Kress wrote: > Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel > Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5). > ... > Mounting root filesystem. > mount: could not find filesystem '/dev/root' > Hi, I'd like to add this to my problem: I tried to mount t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid controllers and I despise them. They fail too often and often don't tell you that they are having problems until it is too late. Are you referring to the SATA controllers or to the SCSI ones? __

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid controllers and I despise them. They fail too often and often don't tell you that they are having problems until it is too late. My suggestion is to use Linux software for your RAID array, and bypass the ServeRaid controller e

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

Fabian Arrotin wrote: > If you use the hw raid, you can easily manager your raid array with > either ipssend cli or ServeRAID manager gui (both are downloadable from > IBM support website) Faultdetection sucks with that, but you can use ipmitool for that: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ipmitool sdr|gr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's a real raid adapter and the linux kernel is able to handle it with >> the standard ips module >> > I found some references in Google that seemed to indicate a "fakeraid" > controller, one that depends on the driver

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My question now is: what would be the better way to implement RAID 5 > on this server? Should I use the detected array and respective driver > or should I delete the array and go for Linus Software RAID? > I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRai

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

It's a real raid adapter and the linux kernel is able to handle it with the standard ips module I found some references in Google that seemed to indicate a "fakeraid" controller, one that depends on the driver to do the RAID calculations... It's always up to you to decide but i'd prefer usi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache with battery backup. It's a real raid adapter and the linu

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache with battery backup. I launched the CentOS boot DVD and Ce

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I know that Linux RAID will create a universal, more compatible array, > readable on any Linux machine. But is there some other reason that > makes it preferrable to use the SERVERAID driver provided by CentOS? > Is it optimized in any way that recommends its use? I alw

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 with IBM SERVERAID 6i

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question now is: what would be the better way to implement RAID 5 on this server? Should I use the detected array and respective driver or should I delete the array and go for Linus Software RAID? I don't know about throughput, but using soft

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 on P5N64

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi all... > > First of all, I'm new to this list. Thanks in advance for the help I surely > will get here ;) > > I have installed a CentOS 5.2 64 bit on a computer, and I can't get it to > boot. > The box is a custom bui

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 21:26, Jun Salen wrote: > > Between Bacula and Backuppc, based on list users experience, which is better > to use? I intend > > to backup both Windows and Linux server. Can I use this to backup my linux > mail server with > > Zimbra services shutdown? Can I use this to back

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

Hi, On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:13, Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future of >> disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool. > > There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a longer > shelf life

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future of disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool. There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a longer shelf life than disks,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future of disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool. There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a longer shelf life than disks, and they're less susce

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

Hi, On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 21:26, Jun Salen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Between Bacula and Backuppc, based on list users experience, which is better > to use? I intend > to backup both Windows and Linux server. Can I use this to backup my linux > mail server with > Zimbra services shutdown? Can

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 11:37:17 -0500 From: Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula To: CentOS mailing list Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Les wrote: > >Tronn Wærdahl wrote: >&g

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 15:42 +0100, Tronn Wærdahl wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have a Samba server on CentOS 5.2 that I would like to and some > > backup service to, I have been trying to install Bacula, because I > > wan

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

Tronn Wærdahl wrote: Hi everyone, I have a Samba server on CentOS 5.2 that I would like to and some backup service to, I have been trying to install Bacula, because I want to backup MS machines too, and there is a web GUI. But when searching around i google I get a bit confused. about what pack

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 15:42 +0100, Tronn Wærdahl wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a Samba server on CentOS 5.2 that I would like to and some > backup service to, I have been trying to install Bacula, because I > want to backup MS machines too, and there is a web GUI. But when > searching around i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kickstart install with latest updates

Venkatraju wrote: The CentOS 5.2 release notes contain this warning: "A kickstart installation that attempts to use the *repo* directive (where that *repo* points to an updates repository) may fail to properly install." In some tests we did at 5.2 install time we found that the updates faile

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kickstart install with latest updates

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 20:44 +0530, Venkatraju wrote: > This is exactly the method that I had been using with CentOS 5.1 :-) > What is the right way to achieve this now? Is adding a repository in > the %post section of the kickstart file and running "yum update" safe? > Anyone run into problems with

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kickstart install with latest updates

On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Venkatraju wrote: Is adding a repository in the %post section of the kickstart file and running "yum update" safe? Anyone run into problems with this? I am using exactly this method with CentOS 5.2. So far only about 20 installations, but I have not had a problem with any

Re: HIP - was Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

Rob Townley wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Rob Townley wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: HIP - was Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Rob Townley wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >>Um, as the original poster, I WANT IPv6. Not make IPv4 lookups >>faster by ignori

HIP - was Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

Rob Townley wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Um, as the original poster, I WANT IPv6. Not make IPv4 lookups faster by ignoring records. Further testing has IPv6 working just fine. Thing is when I

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2, Firefox 3, and IPv6

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Rob Townley wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >>Craig White wrote: >> >>On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 23:28 -0400, Robert Moskowitz w

  1   2   3   >