You don't seem to understand. ;-) I don't take your reply as an offense
and I don't mean mine as an offense, but:
If you did your research then you knew what answer you would get. And you
indeed got that answer. And you were not the only one who asked that and
who got that same answer. The speci
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:00 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I wish people would read the list archives instead of posting the same
> kind of questione time and again.
>
> Kai
Thank you for your thoughts Kai.
I have invested quite a bit of time reading the CentOS and CentOS-Devel
archives, includin
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 11:30 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
>
> > I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
> > so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
> > understanding that "Critical" security u
I wish people would read the list archives instead of posting the same
kind of questione time and again.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/24/2011 02:05 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
>>> so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
>>> understanding that "Critical" security updates and those that are
>>> "remotely exploitable" woul
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>>> However, it was my
>> > understanding that "Critical" security updates and those that are
>> > "remotely exploitable" would be pushed out ahead of 5.6.
>>
>> That is my understanding, too. However, I see that the only "Critical"
>> one o
In article <6182d300241c67c712c405d004e0b5ab.squir...@host290.hostmonster.com>,
wrote:
> Always Learning wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:02 -0500, Cal Webster wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published
> >> for these applications in CentOS 5?
> >>
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:28 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Cal Webster wrote:
>
> > java-1.6.0-sun
>
> non FOSS, non-source provided, no? This is in an addon
> channel in RHEL, and so far as I know we have never shipped
> such
You're right - shouldn't have listed that one. I
>
> > I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
> > so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
> > understanding that "Critical" security updates and those that are
> > "remotely exploitable" would be pushed out ahead of 5.6.
>
> That is my
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
> so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
> understanding that "Critical" security updates and those that are
> "remotely exploitable" would be pus
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:10 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Um, don't use kerberos? Or postgresql? Or Sun's, er, Oracle's java? I
> can't see that going over well.
Sorry to let everyone down. I can't get too excited about these
outstanding security patches. After 5 hours of trying, I can still
Always Learning wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:02 -0500, Cal Webster wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published
>> for these applications in CentOS 5?
>>
>> wireshark
>> postgresql
>> krb5
>> java-1.6.0-openjdk
>> java-1.6.0-sun
>
> Don't use anyone of t
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:02 -0500, Cal Webster wrote:
> Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published
> for these applications in CentOS 5?
>
> wireshark
> postgresql
> krb5
> java-1.6.0-openjdk
> java-1.6.0-sun
Don't use anyone of these privately (on desktop, laptop
13 matches
Mail list logo
