I'm not interested in your misguided vendetta. Can you please take this to
private mail? Thanks.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
htt
R P Herrold wrote:
> > R P Herrold wrote:
> >> ... you do NOT file bugs in the bug tracker to
> make formal
> >> your concern.
>
> > I made last month about security updates missing for
> almost
> > a month.
>
> no bug -> no issue.
>
> > Members of the CentOS community should, in a free
> wor
on 1-12-2009 2:27 PM Googlemail spake the following:
> On Monday 12 January 2009 22:16:25 Marko A. Jennings
> wrote:
>> On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Members of the CentOS community should, in a free
> world be able
>>> to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer
On Monday 12 January 2009 22:16:25 Marko A. Jennings
wrote:
> On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote:
>
>
> > Members of the CentOS community should, in a free
world be able
> > to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer if that
is needed.
> > Off course some don't live in the fre
> So I need a @centos.org address to ask the obvious do I? If so
> I missed your response to the post I made last month about
> security updates missing for almost a month.
No, but the obvious link that you're not making is that you're not
actually offering the help. You have blatantly said in o
On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote:
> Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be able
> to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer if that is needed.
> Off course some don't live in the free world so its
> unfortunate.
>
> Regards,
> Vandaman.
Vandaman,
>From wh
R P Herrold wrote:
> You hold no @centos.org, nor role beyond mailing list
> participant. A non-enumerated list is worse than useless,
> as
> it falsely causes concern. So near as I can tell (and I
> read
> ALL bug filings, centdor-sec, and a daily custom locally
> produced report of all ups
Vandaman wrote:
> I'm sure there are plenty of people who run CentOS in
> production and going without security updates for a month
> is not ideal. Many would offer to help were any offers
> for help made.
Then I would suggest for those that they purchase RHEL with support.
CentOS is a free co
William Warren wrote:
> how about you doing something to help instead of acting
> like an
> emperor..which by the way has no clothes and no throne.
>
I don't see why people have got their knickers in a twist
over a simple question. Was it not me who noticed updates
were missing for nearly a mont
> If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could
> be offered by the CentOS community.
you are either the world's best troll, or a complete moron.
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Vandaman wrote:
> There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5)
> and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt
> and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind,
> or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?
>
> If more volunteers are needed I'm sure
11 matches
Mail list logo
